This reads like you starting with an end point and then twisting logic to get there.
No it's just my logic. Perhaps it's crazy but I'm serious - if it were my choice I'd have sent McDavid to Edmonton.
It's not just about a few ads. Hockey has transcended its North American/North European bubble and achieved genuine global recognition precisely twice - the miracle on ice, and the world's greatest player Wayne Gretzky lifting the Cup for the Oilers. For a sport with a limited profile compared to some that means a lot. If there's a chance to essentially recreate one of those moments, then however long a shot, I'm taking it. McDavid will never have Gretzky's profile - the world has changed plus his personality is too dour - but I still see money, a great story and sheer sporting romanticism in having him follow the same path. Could have been on another team, sure, but IMO it just means more if it's Edmonton.
People disagree with me and that's fine. But the main point is this - if I could think that McDavid to Edmonton was the right choice, is it possible than any of the top brass in the NHL thought so too?
Last edited: