NHL 2023-2024 Out of Town: Regular Season III

Status
Not open for further replies.

22Brad Park

Registered User
Nov 23, 2008
48,280
27,808
Calgary AB
A 1st for Monahan is insane.
Conditional 1st & 3rd but yup.Habs GM did wel
1706894754692.png
 
Last edited:

Jorah Marshmont

Long may he reign
May 10, 2012
4,754
3,252
Now that the only two viable rental centers are off the market, Sweeney is either standing pat or gonna shock us all by acquiring a top 6 center with term/team control years left
 
  • Like
Reactions: dangermike

UConn126

Bass Player.
Sponsor
Jun 12, 2010
8,847
7,791
Somerville, MA
Lol I'm so happy we didn't trade a first for Monahan. I'm good sitting out this deadline at the current prices.

Unless DeBrusk gets us a top 5 pick, which doesn't seem ridiculous based on what Monahan got.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lopey and BMC

dangermike

Registered User
Jan 24, 2022
1,157
1,297
Now that the only two viable rental centers are off the market, Sweeney is either standing pat or gonna shock us all by acquiring a top 6 center with term/team control years left
Insert the pic of pasta and hertl standing next to each other on team mcdavid.
 

Aussie Bruin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 3, 2019
10,930
25,295
Victoria, Aus
In a league where an aging Savard and Foligno have previously cost firsts, it should be no surprise that Monahan did too. It was never going to take anything less to convince the Habs to give him up, because if the Jets didn't offer it, someone else would have. Very small market for available even remotely capable top centers this year - Lindholm was the best, Monahan a somewhat distant second. But when there is not much else you will still pay for that.

I see no reason why Winnipeg should quibble over a first at this point. They have a good shot this year and those don't come around every day, especially for a team like the Jets. So by all means go for it, and go hard. The only question is whether Monahan is the right guy for them. Firstly because his play has declined since 2020, and even though he's arguably been better this year it's uncertain how much he can lift on a better team, second it seemed to me that what their top 6 really needed was an injection of sheer scoring talent, and I'm not sure if Sean is the guy for that.

So whether the Jets have chosen wisely, we'll see. But giving up a 1st for a player the calibre of Monahan is absolutely de rigueur.
 

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
9,891
19,943
In a league where an aging Savard and Foligno have previously cost firsts, it should be no surprise that Monahan did too. It was never going to take anything less to convince the Habs to give him up, because if the Jets didn't offer it, someone else would have. Very small market for available even remotely capable top centers this year - Lindholm was the best, Monahan a somewhat distant second. But when there is not much else you will still pay for that.

I see no reason why Winnipeg should quibble over a first at this point. They have a good shot this year and those don't come around every day, especially for a team like the Jets. So by all means go for it, and go hard. The only question is whether Monahan is the right guy for them. Firstly because his play has declined since 2020, and even though he's arguably been better this year it's uncertain how much he can lift on a better team, second it seemed to me that what their top 6 really needed was an injection of sheer scoring talent, and I'm not sure if Sean is the guy for that.

So whether the Jets have chosen wisely, we'll see. But giving up a 1st for a player the calibre of Monahan is absolutely de rigueur.
I wouldn’t pay a first for him, but Winnipeg badly needed some help on the powerplay, and Monahan is strong there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad