MarchysNoseKnows
Big Hat No Cattle
- Feb 14, 2018
- 9,832
- 19,777
That’s anecdotal though. I’ve coached 8U and I’m coaching 12U right now. The size and skill differential at mid- to lower levels of hockey makes it a non starter. And the reasoning behind it is scientific and statistical - with injury proclivity and the like. Kids in the upper 10% of the size or even more importantly skating ability spectrum may be able to avoid hits but the average youth town hockey player cannot. Even at the club level where I live it’s very apparent.I wholeheartedly disagree with this thinking. I have always been easily the smallest guy in any league I've played in. If I had learned hitting at 13 or 14 I would have had too many concussions to count.
Instead we started learning at 10 in hockey schools how to properly hit/receive hits and started body contact in games in 11AA....it was huge personally for me to learn to take hits at that age when kids are generally max 100 lbs rather than to wait until everyone else had a massive growth spurt and i was still 80 lbs soaking wet.
They are hurting undersized kids by not teaching them not only how to hit, but more importantly how to protect yourself and take a hit properly at a young age. Just my two cents of course, I understand not needing physicality at that age, but I guarantee you I would not have went from 14 to 18 years old with zero injuries had they not started us early.
Agree to disagree here but as someone in that world on a couple different levels right now I’m very glad for no hitting. The game is plenty physical already at the 8U level, and at the Pee Wee Major level even more so.