Blender
Registered User
- Dec 2, 2009
- 52,688
- 46,449
He's pretty high up in the PL in those categories, but Chelsea has probably had too much possession for him to lead. Most players above him play for teams that concede possession.The way they word that looks like they are saying he leads the PL in all those categories, heh.
Lady Catherine Ferguson has passed away. Sir Alex and she had been married since 1966.
It has to be watkins?Player of the month nominees:
Alvarez - 2G 2A
Bowen - 3G
Neto - 1G 3A
Salah - 2G 2A
Son - 6G
Trippier - 4A
Watkins - 4G 1A
Bad enough to make them finish 11th or lower like you believed?So, the Spurs very easy schedule to start the season is going to catch up with them in December when they have Aston Villa, Man City, West Ham, and Newcastle United all in a row. Then in late April, they have Newcastle, Man City, Arsenal, and Liverpool in a row as well.
Bad enough to make them finish 11th or lower like you believed?
Sure, their schedule has been relatively easy. But winning the easier games consistently is hardly a guarantee, and they've done that so far. They've gotten good results from the more difficult games too. Including against the "mighty" Arsenal at the Emirates.
Look, I'm absolutely not saying they are title contwnders. Hardly believe they'll keep up this form. But Champions League next season looks like a real possibility so far.
If I got to play a Luton Town-esque club, I would start falsely believing the same aspect so I fully understand your opinion.Look, I'm absolutely not saying they are title contwnders. Hardly believe they'll keep up this form. But Champions League next season looks like a real possibility so far.
No insecurity from me brethren, just an observation I detected as to why the Spurs are tied for 1st overall. Very easy schedule with some serendipitous mixed in (ref against LFC). If the Spurs are still in a pretty decent spot after those two notable areas of the schedule that I posted above, then I will absolutely give you lot credit. I'll wait until otherwise noted.Let their insecurities continue to make them lash out at another club.
Yes, but we also beat City with our best player out for it as well (with their best player out) which is the best team in the entire world.Including against the "mighty" Arsenal at the Emirates.
Reminder that "mighty title contenders" Arsenal drew 20th place Southampton twice last season.If I got to play a Luton Town-esque club, I would start falsely believing the same aspect so I fully understand your opinion.
City looked piss yesterday. Spurs did a much better job at the Emirates than they did. That doesn't mean I think they are the better team however.Yes, but we also beat City with our best player out for it as well (with their best player out) which is the best team in the entire world.
That's funny because that's the exact thing I can say after the North London Derby considering that Nketiah never was sent off for clattering Vicario.Very easy schedule with some serendipitous mixed in (ref against LFC).
Adding to this, all recent instances of a top level keeper (off top of head) coming to England as a finished product (not as a project, so removing De Gea and Kepa) have been successful and hit the ground running:De Gea were a 20 year old in a new country. Not comparable imo.
Highlight how similar their starts were. Both let in howlers.De Gea were a 20 year old in a new country. Not comparable imo.
Yes, obviously, we're not stupid. But (unless you were sharing just as a funny little tidbit, in which case, great i guess?) the obvious point was "De Gea started bad and turned out to be world class", in which case the comparison hits major walls early.Highlight how similar their starts were. Both let in howlers.