JR - agreed. I think he spent so much time trying to curry favor with the team that it wiped out any ability to be objective, and that wiped out his credibility.
Jim Thomas - was great covering football; no clue how he is on hockey, I haven't touched the Post-Disgrace in years and won't for the foreseeable future.
Lou Korac - one thing you know with him: you're going to get what he thinks, he's not going to dress everything up nice. Whether you agree with what he says or not is another story. I've never gotten the sense that he makes stuff up, but the Hockey News article felt a little too much like the myopic, knee-jerk takes I've seen Blues fans roll out even if I agreed with the headline of the article.
I don't think fans are booing after a loss because we lost. I think they're booing because of the lack of effort we put forth most nights when we lose. St. Louis is a very blue-collar town that expects the truth out of folks; you're working your ass off, they'll still support you even if you lose as long as they feel like they're getting the straight story. You try to pull the wool over their eyes, they see through it and get pissed. You see that with the Cardinals right now, you saw it in the later years of the Rams, you saw it in the Bill Laurie Rain of Terror. You're seeing some of that same stuff now with the Blues.