Sorry to say dude, but how the defence has been playing that 88% save percentage is just acceptable. Not good definitely, but acceptable in the situation. Jatkola was absolutely horrible against Slovakia, so he isn’t an answer, as he is clearly worse than Meriläinen. And as some people have already pointed out, Blomqvist hasn’t had that great record in his last U20 national team games, so it’s a bit dishonest to claim that he would be that much greater with such bad defence that Finland has been playing.
Finland’s problems in my opinion are Pennanen’s coaching and generally bad defence. Also we don’t have enough of offensively gifted players in the team and the centers especially lack badly offensive talent and creativity after Räty. A team with these kinds of weaknesses can easily get beaten by a team like Canada, if Finland doesn’t have their absolute best game and even a bit of luck. I’m still quite confidence that Finland is in the best four. And with their best game and maybe even a bit of luck they might still even upset Canada. And even if they won’t but will after all get bronze medals for example, then they have done well enough with this roster and especially with this coaching.
Okay, all over again...
So Blomqvist having a bad record with the u20's is relevant, even if he would've had a bad defense in front of him?
But suddenly when you name Meriläinen it's what, irrelevant? Is that your argument?
Are you claiming that your argument and conclusion would be more honest? Because your arguments aren't valid and you are not consistent in your reasoning.
Regarding Pennanen i do agree. It's his fault.
The defense is a complete joke.
That's why i adressed Karhukissa already. I don't agree in his claimings stating and believing in our system when the defense has looked terrible.
Almost 10 goals against Canada and Czechia. The latter not even having their best generation among forwards with only Mysak standing out.
But come on, this roster is still supposed to be a medal contender without any doubt, everything less than that is a complete failure. Let's be honest about that.
You're mentioning center depth.
So besides Cooley, is the american depth really that much better? They don't seem to have the best goalie either.
Sweden then? Center depth? They don't even have a center of Rätys caliber and Lekkerimäki hasn't produced as expected, not yet that is.
He was supposed to be their best forward besides Lysell?
Last but not least, your mentioning our forward depth? But the thing is that they've actually produced some what okay, the only aspect that has been decent in our game perhaps, individual brilliance.
Regarding depth? Is this unusual? To have a bit more of anonymous names in our bottom 6?
Should Kapanen be that bad? Helenius etc, compared to other nations and their centers.
You guys are constantly repeating yourselves and only mentioning Canada. What about the US? Sweden?