Raccoon Jesus
We were right there
Lining up around the block to defend Blake’s mediocre record of half ass measures is being completely drunk on the purple koolaid.
What’s the argument here? Blake is an average GM, so everyone of his moves is defensible in hindsight if you honestly believe he is handcuffed by whatever context supports your take of the situation?
If this guy is such a cold stone genius, he must have an inherited the worst mess of all time to be stymied at every turn.
I don't think he's a genius, but I think there's enough evidence to show he does not subscribe to sunk cost fallacy.
The argument is that he doesn't cut 'his guys' but who should he be cutting that he didn't on top of the literal 15 examples already posted that would satisfy the argument?