Hockey Duckie
Registered User
I think this team is closer to being on the playoff bubble than to have a legit chance at Bedard. I hate tanking, not going to stay up to 1am watching a team get their asses handed to them every night with no hope.
This group gives me some hope to be somewhat competitive in games and can go either way. I think they upgraded a lot on the offense side and with the development and growth of the kids can see an even bigger upgrade from within .
Someone called Gibson a wild card. That is so true. He has to play solid and stay what way. He fell off a cliff after the ASG and the team was still in a playoff spot so not sure what he was thinking or why the lack of motivation. Gibby doesn’t have to necessarily pull pre-ASG number. I’m talking around a 910 to .915 SV% and around 2.6-2.8 GAA, which is right below or above his career averages. I think this team can score 3 or more goals most nights to give him support with how it’s shaping up.
Still would like Verbeek to add another Top 6F or Top 4D then think they can be a Dark Horse this season. Even if a lot of things still have to happen.
I'm wondering if the team was playing tight after the ASG b/c of our new GM and wondering if the team will stay intact.
After the TDL, our ES offense improved, but our defense stayed meh. What hurt us tremendously was falling off of a cliff at our special teams. We lost four players from our special teams: Lindholm (PP and PK), Manson (PK), Des (PK), and Rakell (PP). The team was forced to use Fowler and Shatty more on the PK, which wore them out to on the PP.
With Strome, Vatrano, McTavish, Jones, and an in-shape/motivated Comtois, I think our forward group has the potential to exceed what we lost last year, including Getz to retirement. We have a lot of unknowns with those five forwards b/c they weren't with us last year - yes, this includes Comtois b/c we got chubby Comtois last year than competitive Comtois from two seasons ago.
Defensively, all we did was add Klingberg. That's pure offense there! He can take up the PP slack now that we are reliant on Fowler and Shatty to be on the PK unit. We may lose a lot of games b/c we don't have the horses to penalty kill well. We traded for one uber offense guy with little defense vs two shutdown guys with some offense.
Forward group offense: the same or better
Forward group defense: better
Defensive group offense: better
Defensive group defense: far worse
If our PP can score more than our PK unit gives up, then we could be a middling team. If we did at a top-4 shutdown LD, then we might be scratching on the fringe of a playoff spot.
.
=====
Statistical reason why our current roster set is going to be like the game 34-62 set from last year.
Read at your own peril.
Ducks | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021-22 | |||||||||||||||
Game Set | GP | W | L | OTL | Pts | . | GF | GA | GD | GF/GP | GA/GP | GD/GP | Point Share | ||
Total | 82 | 31 | 37 | 14 | 76 | 232 | 271 | -39 | 2.83 | 3.30 | -0.48 | 0.463 | |||
Gm 1 - 33 | 33 | 17 | 9 | 7 | 41 | 104 | 91 | 13 | 3.15 | 2.76 | 0.39 | 0.621 | |||
Gm 34 - 62 | 29 | 10 | 16 | 3 | 23 | 76 | 106 | -30 | 2.62 | 3.66 | -1.03 | 0.397 | |||
Gm 63 - 82 | 20 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 12 | 52 | 74 | -22 | 2.60 | 3.70 | -1.10 | 0.300 |
Gm 1 - 33: Healthy defense
Gm 34 - 62: Not so healthy defense. (Lindholm missed 2 games, Fowler 4 games, and Manson 16 games.)
Gm 63-82: After TDL
In totality, our offense and defense got slightly worse in GF and GA per game. The win column actually paints a far worse outcome. Why?
Ducks ES Split | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021-22 | |||||||||||||
Game Set | GP | GF | GA | GD | . | PPG | PK GA | . | ESG | ESG/GP | ESGA | ESGA/GP | ES GD/GP |
Total | 82 | 232 | 271 | -39 | 48 | 43 | 184 | 2.24 | 228 | 2.78 | -0.54 | ||
Gm 1 - 33 | 33 | 104 | 91 | 13 | 23 | 12 | 81 | 2.45 | 79 | 2.39 | 0.06 | ||
Gm 34 - 62 | 29 | 76 | 106 | -30 | 19 | 17 | 57 | 1.97 | 89 | 3.07 | -1.10 | ||
Gm 63 - 82 | 20 | 52 | 74 | -22 | 6 | 14 | 46 | 2.30 | 60 | 3.00 | -0.70 |
This was surprising to me. Our offense at ES kicked it up a notch! While our ES defense stayed porous, the offense closed the gap for ES goal differential.
Game 63-82
Total GA per game = 3.70
ES GA per game = 3.00
That should identify how bad our PK unit was.
Ducks | Special Teams | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021-22 | ||||||||
Game Set | Games | PPG | PPO | Eff | PK GA | TSH | PK Eff | |
1 to 33 | 33 | 23 | 90 | 25.6% | 12 | 85 | 85.9% | |
34 to 62 | 29 | 19 | 85 | 22.4% | 17 | 89 | 80.9% | |
63 to 82 | 20 | 6 | 44 | 13.6% | 14 | 50 | 72.0% |
The bottom fell out at both the PP and PK units.
Games 1 - 33: We were positive ES Goal Differential per game played + top-5 PP + top-5 PK
Games 34-62: We were negative ES GD/GP + top-11 PP + top-15 PK
Games 63-82: We were negative ES GD/GP + 31st PP + 32nd PK (last in league)
Two seasons ago, with a last place PP and average PK, Anaheim struggled mightily. Yet, they were involved in a plethora of 1-goal games. (See next post)