Speculation: 2022-23 Roster Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sean Garrity

Quack Quack Quack!
Dec 25, 2007
17,572
6,274
Dee Eff UU
I’m glad we can stop with the nonsense internet detective crap and hope people learned their lesson

Agreed, but guilty people make innocent statements to the media and in general all the time. In either case, I think we all can agree that playing internet detective is nonsense and that social media just thrives on the toxicity.
 

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
18,949
14,127
southern cal
Can't significantly disagree with anything you said. I would point out that, outside of the Olympics, he's produced very well at every level. Other posters have seen him far more than I have outside of the NHL, but the scouting report seems to still be that he can be invisible so to speak, but then change the game at any moment. I'd like to see him improve his physicality and defense so that way even if he's invisible offensively, he's still contributing to his line while always being one touch away from scoring a goal which is an ability he has shown.

Later in the OHL season and playoffs, I've been sharing instances where he's not on the scoreboard, but he actually helps his team lead to a score. He's winning scrums along the corner or boards, he's preventing pucks from leaving the offensive zone, subtle picking while scrumming, he's driving to the net to cause defenders to pay more attention to him, or he's winning faceoffs that leads to a quick goal two passes later.

Defensively, oddly enough, his line doesn't stay on the defensive zone all that much b/c once the puck is on their hands, they bring the puck up and live on the offensive side. McTavish-Winterton are such a good pair for the Bulldogs.

During the playoffs, McTavish looked tired and in a gm 6 OHL championship game, McTavish was just worn down. The reason behind this are two factors, one was he was being double shifted and he was playing through injuries. That game 6 where he was just worn down is true b/c he put the team on his back in game 5 to win game 5. Also, games 5 and 6 were back to back games. There was a day break between game 6 and game 7. McTavish had a 3-point night (2g, 1a), +4 rating, and went 23/40 at the faceoff dot.

If there is one thing I want McTavish to improve on this off-season and onwards is his endurance. He probably won't be double-shifted as often in the NHL, but he can be more effective longer. One aspect about McTavish, with respect to endurance, is he knows when to get off the ice and not be a liability on the ice by being tired for an extended shift that could have been avoided. I kept noticing that how often he changes in games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sean Garrity
Aug 11, 2011
29,060
24,283
Am Yisrael Chai
Later in the OHL season and playoffs, I've been sharing instances where he's not on the scoreboard, but he actually helps his team lead to a score. He's winning scrums along the corner or boards, he's preventing pucks from leaving the offensive zone, subtle picking while scrumming, he's driving to the net to cause defenders to pay more attention to him, or he's winning faceoffs that leads to a quick goal two passes later.

Defensively, oddly enough, his line doesn't stay on the defensive zone all that much b/c once the puck is on their hands, they bring the puck up and live on the offensive side. McTavish-Winterton are such a good pair for the Bulldogs.

During the playoffs, McTavish looked tired and in a gm 6 OHL championship game, McTavish was just worn down. The reason behind this are two factors, one was he was being double shifted and he was playing through injuries. That game 6 where he was just worn down is true b/c he put the team on his back in game 5 to win game 5. Also, games 5 and 6 were back to back games. There was a day break between game 6 and game 7. McTavish had a 3-point night (2g, 1a), +4 rating, and went 23/40 at the faceoff dot.

If there is one thing I want McTavish to improve on this off-season and onwards is his endurance. He probably won't be double-shifted as often in the NHL, but he can be more effective longer. One aspect about McTavish, with respect to endurance, is he knows when to get off the ice and not be a liability on the ice by being tired for an extended shift that could have been avoided. I kept noticing that how often he changes in games.

You could be 100% right but I won't make up my mind on Mason until I see a lot of him for myself. There are too many conflicting signals for my liking. There are a lot of signs point to me being wrong about him but I don't know which ones to read.
 

ohcomeonref

#FireCronin
Sponsor
Oct 18, 2014
7,002
8,195
Alberta, Canada

That is in fact a nuts list with some surprising names on it. That poster is making an idiotic assertion though: sexual assault is a problem with the NHL specifically. It's not, it's a problem with rich and powerful people never having the same repercussions as normal people. It's a societal problem and I have no idea how you go about tackling it.
 

Deuce22

Registered User
Jun 17, 2013
5,946
8,420
SoCal & Idaho
That is in fact a nuts list with some surprising names on it. That poster is making an idiotic assertion though: sexual assault is a problem with the NHL specifically. It's not, it's a problem with rich and powerful people never having the same repercussions as normal people. It's a societal problem and I have no idea how you go about tackling it.
It's a power and entitlement problem. Those fans that want to say that "hockey culture" is unique to sexual assault have an agenda. It happens anywhere that men feel entitled and know that their power (and money) afford them an advantage over the accuser/victim.
 

DavidBL

Registered User
Jul 25, 2012
6,253
4,276
Orange, CA
They don't have to. They're listed as less than $500k over the cap but that's with 8 defensemen, send one down and they'll fit right under. Seravalli mentioned they have a buyout window right now which could be a hint or could just be nothing at all.
Probably cheaper than trading someone
 

bsu

"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
Sep 27, 2017
28,539
29,293
Anotha one....



 
Last edited:

bsu

"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
Sep 27, 2017
28,539
29,293
FWIW, NRD on Twitter has been adamant that Zegras is on the NHL 23 cover. There were some light rumors about it before and I don't think NRD is every this confident something is going to happen.
EA/NHL sucks ass now so many glitches and same shit year after year but if Zegras is on the cover I'll buy it.
 

All Mighty

Registered User
Sep 20, 2014
12,371
19,863
California
allmightyhockeytalk.com
FWIW, NRD on Twitter has been adamant that Zegras is on the NHL 23 cover. There were some light rumors about it before and I don't think NRD is every this confident something is going to happen.
I wonder if Z's new number will be announced alongside the unveiling of the cover. Would be pretty stupid if they just used #46 on it.
 

bsu

"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
Sep 27, 2017
28,539
29,293
I wonder if Z's new number will be announced alongside the unveiling of the cover. Would be pretty stupid if they just used #46 on it.
It definitely would and I wouldn't be surprised if that's when he/they will announce his new number.
 

bsu

"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
Sep 27, 2017
28,539
29,293
I posted the Zegras NHL 23 rumor on my Instagram story and someone I know very well that works for the Ducks (well OCV!BE now) said she heard the executives talking with the Ducks president about this 2 months ago and that she overhead he was going to be on the cover.... She's not even a Ducks fan but she messaged me and said that. Take it with a grain of salt but she does work high up in the Ducks organization and has for a while, she was recently promoted into a executive spot for the new OCV!BE.... Too bad my boy Kyle Shohara ain't around anymore :(
 

Leonardo87

New York Rangers, Anaheim Ducks, and TMNT fan.
Sponsor
Dec 8, 2013
40,980
64,791
New York
As much as McTavish has this potential I just don’t see him being in a Top 6 role right away unless he earns it up there. Verbeek has brought in two forwards who can play in the Top 6, one a Center, and one a sniper for Z, and he also wants to add another Top 6 forward. I see the lines being something like…

Henrique - Strome - Terry
Vatrano - Zegras - Top 6 addition
McTavish - Lundy - Silf
Jones - Carrick - Comtois
Grant

Comtois Also has to earn a place in the Top 9 as well, and it will start with a great camp and pre-season.

Mac still needs to learn to play on the NHL and sheltered with two defensive minded guys is a good way to help him develop a solid two way game, and maybe Lundy and Mac can develop some nice chemistry and produce. Lundy still has offensive potential and maybe Mac helps him achieve it. Silf is the defensive responsible vet.

I know some people will be upset with Mac on that line but Lundy is not a scrub , Silf may be washed up offensively but he will be good support for a developing Mac. Could also see Mac and Lundy sharing the FO circle so he gets reps in at C.
 

duckpuck

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 10, 2007
2,587
2,719
I wonder if FLA would consider moving Sam Bennett? They need to move salary and shore up their defense and he's a bit overpaid, particularly given his role on that team.

Does a Comtois and Shat for Bennett type of trade make sense? Not sure Fla would want Shat. But ducks could add other assets (nothing too big).

Ducks could then get a different D-man in a separate deal (Erik Johnson, Petterson, Scandella, Barrie, etc.)
 

Paul4587

Registered User
Jan 26, 2006
31,206
13,232
I wonder if FLA would consider moving Sam Bennett? They need to move salary and shore up their defense and he's a bit overpaid, particularly given his role on that team.

Does a Comtois and Shat for Bennett type of trade make sense? Not sure Fla would want Shat. But ducks could add other assets (nothing too big).

Ducks could then get a different D-man in a separate deal (Erik Johnson, Petterson, Scandella, Barrie, etc.)

Looking at their D core they probably need a LD more than another RD. On the right they have Ekblad, Montour and Gudas. On the left they have Forsling and not much beyond him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: duckpuck

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
18,949
14,127
southern cal
As much as McTavish has this potential I just don’t see him being in a Top 6 role right away unless he earns it up there. Verbeek has brought in two forwards who can play in the Top 6, one a Center, and one a sniper for Z, and he also wants to add another Top 6 forward. I see the lines being something like…

Henrique - Strome - Terry
Vatrano - Zegras - Top 6 addition
McTavish - Lundy - Silf
Jones - Carrick - Comtois
Grant

Comtois Also has to earn a place in the Top 9 as well, and it will start with a great camp and pre-season.

Mac still needs to learn to play on the NHL and sheltered with two defensive minded guys is a good way to help him develop a solid two way game, and maybe Lundy and Mac can develop some nice chemistry and produce. Lundy still has offensive potential and maybe Mac helps him achieve it. Silf is the defensive responsible vet.

I know some people will be upset with Mac on that line but Lundy is not a scrub , Silf may be washed up offensively but he will be good support for a developing Mac. Could also see Mac and Lundy sharing the FO circle so he gets reps in at C.

How exactly is McTavish going to earn it if he doesn't have the avenue to earn it? He's not going back to the OHL because he dominated that league in his own way. The AHL isn't an option for him. If Strome is set at center, then are you willing to waste a year of center development for McTavish just so he can play center in the AHL next season to prove he can be a top-6 center in the AHL first?

We gifted Zegras a top-6 role last year after only 44 pro games two seasons ago (mix of AHL and NHL games). Zegras developed last year and is still in the process of developing. McTavish has been in 34 games against men already (NHL, AHL, Olympics, and NL-B). Why the double standard?

Are we trying to compete this year for the playoffs? It doesn't seem like it. We sent McTavish to Juniors b/c we wanted him to develop at center. So we're bringing him along now to stick him at wing when Getz retired? This is going to be a development/rebuild year.

We saw two years ago how Zegras struggled at wing in the NHL. When we put him back at center, Zegras was a different, better player.

I guess you don't trust McTavish's talent at center. Sillinger played center all year for the Blue Jackets. Beniers was placed at center after his college season ended and Lines.com is projecting him to be the Kracken's 1C. McTavish is probably saying to himself...

rodney-dangerfield-get-no-respect.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bsu
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad