What am I missing here? Seider 50 points in 82 games. Bowen Byram 17 in 30 with no power play time. Both guys play a good two-way game. Byram played a massive role on a cup winning team. Not sure why that doesn’t matter.
I think Seider could end up being a top-10 D, but I just don’t see this wide gap that a lot of people seem to see. Seider looks like he’s skating with cement in his skates compared to Byram.
30 Games. Literally. You think he belongs in the Top 100 after 30 games?
This is also the problem with using a small sample size and extrapolating it over a full year. Just because he put up 17 in 30 games doesn't mean he keeps that pace up over a full 82 games. It is far, far, far more impressive to do what Seider did over the course of an entire season then a sample size of 1/3 of that.
Bo's gotta stay healthy for a year before you can even start discussing him on a list like this. Then he's gotta actually put together a good full season as well. 20 games means nothing compared to a full season body of work.