Rumor: 2022-2023 Free Agency and Trade Rumors: STILL searching for a 2C

Status
Not open for further replies.

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,727
5,526
Vrana has only played in 28 of a possible 93 games for Detroit this season and last. He was just waived by one of the smartest GMs in hockey, and not a single team claimed him - not even crappy Arizona or Chicago. Vrana also has 0 goals, 1 assist, and a -6 rating in 6 AHL games this year.

Vrana's a great talent but it's obvious that either his mental or/and physical health is plaguing him right now.

EDIT: He was a healthy scratch last night for Grand Rapids.

 
Last edited:
Nov 29, 2003
53,624
39,009
Screw You Blaster
Visit site
Vrana has only played in 28 of a possible 93 games for Detroit this season and last. He was just waived by one of the smartest GMs in hockey, and not a single team claimed him - not even crappy Arizona or Chicago. Vrana also has 0 goals, 1 assist, and a -6 rating in 6 AHL games this year.

Vrana's a great talent but it's obvious that either his mental or/and physical health is plaguing him right now.

EDIT: He was a healthy scratch last night for Grand Rapids.

This is part of my argument. There's a huge risk with Vrana, and you essentially HAVE to make a move just to make room for him. Maybe not this season, definitely next season. It also essentially eliminates the teams options for finding a 2C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shadow1

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,095
53,588
In a non bedard/Covid fallout year I’m guessing Vrana would have been claimed.
Probably, but just as much of the issue is he was placed in the program, not voluntarily admitted. Meaning his coke problem was enough that Detroit not only just didn’t dealt with it (because usage is high across the league), but felt he had to get rehab that he didn’t want.
 

Muffin

Avalanche Flavoured
Aug 14, 2009
17,754
20,962
Edmonton

95snipes

Registered User
Dec 11, 2019
1,110
1,449
Kevin Hayes with 1-2M retained is perfect for this team.
We know the Avs have had interest in the past so it wouldn't be surprising to see that happen. I don't love the idea of including our '23 first in that deal though. At least at this point. That could change if we go on a major run before March 3rd. Maybe the '24 1st top 10 protected and one of our prospects that's not OO, Behrens or Foudy.

Or maybe even Newhook for Hayes at 50%. Not sure if that's bad for us or for them.
 

Muffin

Avalanche Flavoured
Aug 14, 2009
17,754
20,962
Edmonton
We know the Avs have had interest in the past so it wouldn't be surprising to see that happen. I don't love the idea of including our '23 first in that deal though. At least at this point. That could change if we go on a major run before March 3rd. Maybe the '24 1st top 10 protected and one of our prospects that's not OO, Behrens or Foudy.

Or maybe even Newhook for Hayes at 50%. Not sure if that's bad for us or for them.
Philly won't retain 50% considering he has 3 more years on his contract after this year. It's rare enough teams be willing to retain contracts with terms on them. I can only remember Kessel being the only one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 95snipes

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,095
53,588
Philly won't retain 50% considering he has 3 more years on his contract after this year. It's rare enough teams be willing to retain contracts with terms on them. I can only remember Kessel being the only one.
OEL too… Murray has another year too. It happens from time to time. 50% would asking a ton though. Roughly $6m = 1st round pick… then do the math.
 

CobraAcesS

De Opresso Liber
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2011
26,436
10,449
Michigan
Philly won't retain 50% considering he has 3 more years on his contract after this year. It's rare enough teams be willing to retain contracts with terms on them. I can only remember Kessel being the only one.
Someone posted the numbers on the main board, but they can retain around 2M/yr I think and be paying less total and it would be less years than a buyout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chiarelli

Muffin

Avalanche Flavoured
Aug 14, 2009
17,754
20,962
Edmonton
Someone posted the numbers on the main board, but they can retain around 2M/yr I think and be paying less total and it would be less years than a buyout.
Seems insane to me he could be a buyout candidate. His defense can't be THAT bad that you'd buy out someone who has 36 points in 41 games.
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,095
53,588
Torts does this everywhere he goes. There is always one guy he clashes with more than the rest of the team. Clearly he has chosen Hayes this season. Players either respond to it or they want out - I bet Hayes is the type to want out.
I don’t think he singles anyone out, but players either respond or don’t. If they don’t, he will make an example out of them. If there is a higher profile player, that’ll get run.

Hayes is a good, but flawed player. Easily a 2nd liner. If the NHL wasn’t so cap strapped, his contract would be looked at favorably. With nobody having any cap space, it gets tough. At 5m he’s a F bargain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: expatriatedtexan

Avs_19

Registered User
Jun 28, 2007
85,743
34,519
The Wings immediately putting Vrana on waivers after he returned was yet another red flag in a line of red flags. Of course they quickly leaked that it was due to some returning players in the future and needing cap space and that might partly be true but call me skeptical. Yzerman is ruthless and he was trying to rid himself of this issue all together IMO.

Good player but you can't take that risk with his contract. There have to be better options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender

Pierce Hawthorne

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 29, 2012
46,493
45,025
Caverns of Draconis
Brent Burns was also just traded last summer with $2.7M retention for 3 more years. Retained salary deals aren't necessarily unicorns.

The issue is likely convincing Philly that they need a rebuild. They seem to have an ownership group hell bent on mediocrity and never committing to the full rebuild. But if they do decided a true rebuild is the best way to go, retaining 50% on Hayes would absolutely be the right choice. That would allow them to maximize the return(And it would be a pretty nice return) while they go through years of not even trying to be competitive.
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,095
53,588
Brent Burns was also just traded last summer with $2.7M retention for 3 more years. Retained salary deals aren't necessarily unicorns.

The issue is likely convincing Philly that they need a rebuild. They seem to have an ownership group hell bent on mediocrity and never committing to the full rebuild. But if they do decided a true rebuild is the best way to go, retaining 50% on Hayes would absolutely be the right choice. That would allow them to maximize the return(And it would be a pretty nice return) while they go through years of not even trying to be competitive.
They hired the exact wrong guy to coach a team trying to tank (ie so they aren’t trying to tank). Torts can take a bottom dwelling team and push them to .500. A .500 team into the wild card. He gives you the mushy middle if you’re bad. If your a wild card team to start, he can elevate to a good playoff team. From there, he tends to not be able to get teams all the way over the hump. Though he has had a number of good runs before that just came up short.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad