Bigger problem for next year is missing 3 top 6 forwards from last year's team. the d is largely coaching issue. not saying that the d will be championship level, but the pieces aren't awful. moving out a d or 2 is about rebalancing payroll and realizing that these guys will be lesser by the time we are a contender, notsomuch that they can't be good enough to be a pretender if we have competent coaching.
The problem is this is the ultimate trap. I do think we're close to the playoffs than a lot of people here think, assuming we get competent coaching next year. It's not hard to see us do that, maybe re-sign O'Reilly, and then sneak in in a weak western conference. But that just puts us in the trap of not being bad enough to really build a true contender and not being good enough to truly contend.
Maybe there's another Lindholm available in the future where if Army is ready we can take a significant step forward. I'm not familiar enough with the entire league to make any prediction on that happening, and part of it is also just going to be players developing in unexpected ways and changing roster dynamics.
I'm also not sure Army can make it happen. He's had a decent track record with unexpected trades, but he also seems to do a lot of we need X so sign the best X and ignore play style/value/fit. I don't have faith he can identify a defenseman who may be undervalued by someone else but may be primed to take another step with us. That's also a problem with the team's identity; what is the type of player who may be undervalued for the type of roster we're trying to build? We used to be a team built around defensively responsible forwards and forechecking but that certainly isn't our identity now, and maybe it shouldn't be with Kyrou, Thomas, and Krug as long term parts of the roster. I don't know.
Just going to sit back, pray we win the lottery, and hope Army works some magic.