Snubbed4Vezina
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2022
- 2,420
- 4,237
I'd love to have Sunny back for a season but that's the type of move is going to be difficult for the Blues to make after taking on Kapanen's $3.2M cap hit.
Depends on if that someone is ready for the NHL, makes sense in a 4th line role and can provide what Sunny can for cheaper.Would rather just play someone from Springfield than sign someone whose best hockey is behind him.
I'd love Sunny back, but only if it's for around $1mm. KK's contract may preclude other deals, but not Sunny because if he wants $2mm+ not likely to be in Lou.I'd love to have Sunny back for a season but that's the type of move is going to be difficult for the Blues to make after taking on Kapanen's $3.2M cap hit.
I wouldn't want him at that price regardless of whether we have KK.That's what I'm saying. I don't see him taking $1M or less coming off of a solid season for the Wings where he made $2.75M.
Worked for Edmonton. Well, sort of…Just win back to back lotteries, Bedard, and whoever the top dman is next year. Problem solved.
Keep sucking until you win the right one. Edmonton just forgot to stop sucking to build a decent team around McDavid and Draisaitl.Worked for Edmonton. Well, sort of…
mmmmmm vampyric!Keep sucking until you win the right one. Edmonton just forgot to stop sucking to build a decent team around McDavid and Draisaitl.
Keep sucking until you win the right one. Edmonton just forgot to stop sucking to build a decent team around McDavid and Draisaitl.
I'll answer this Friday night or Saturday.What do you guys think we do for our defense next year? I don't think we can move Krug and nobody will pay us the price we want for Parayko. So assuming those 2 stay we will have Parayko, Faulk, Krug, Leddy, Scandella, Rosen, Bortuzzo, Tucker, Perunovich.
To add something to it now, I do wonder what we do if Army can't move Krug or Parayko. Would he pivot and move Faulk in the summer, could we try and move Leddy instead, or just accept that we'd be stuck with the group for longer than we'd prefer.What do you guys think we do for our defense next year? I don't think we can move Krug and nobody will pay us the price we want for Parayko. So assuming those 2 stay we will have Parayko, Faulk, Krug, Leddy, Scandella, Rosen, Bortuzzo, Tucker, Perunovich.
I wonder if that's not a terrible comp. Obviously, it's a scenario where everything goes perfectly, but it's smart of him to model his game after a player that you are similar size of and have similar play styles. I don't think we should project that, but so far, his development path is sort of similar, Letang was a better goal scorer though. And Letang probably had more buzz as a prospect being involved with Canada's U18 and U20 teams.
Echoing @bleedblue1223, I don't know how to answer that without knowing the markets for any of our 4 highest paid D or without knowing how willing each of those guys is to waive their NTCs.What do you guys think we do for our defense next year? I don't think we can move Krug and nobody will pay us the price we want for Parayko. So assuming those 2 stay we will have Parayko, Faulk, Krug, Leddy, Scandella, Rosen, Bortuzzo, Tucker, Perunovich.
Yeah, it's definitely more of a stylistic comp than a projection comp. Is he going to be more of a play driver with good defense, or someone that is decent in a bunch of areas, but not really excelling at the next level at any of them, like say Leddy.that is a roundabout way of saying that letang was simply better. which is fine, because letang is borderline HOFer.
I wish I had more confidence in our pro scouting, because for all of the discussion of needing a true #1 D (which could very well be true) I think a more viable path to a better defense is to target a non-premium asset that can fill the role that JBo had, but a little younger. A left D in the 27-30 year old range that can re-stabilize Parayko on a top pairing would be a great first step, then work on getting a #3/#4 LD to pair with Faulk so one of Leddy or Krug can hold down the 3rd pairing. If you can move both of Leddy and Krug in the next 18 months to help pay for the new guys (you certainly have to subtract at least one to make two adds), you can pencil in one of Tucker or Perunovich on the 3rd pairing and hope that one of Kessel, Lyle, Gaudet, Buchinger or a 2023 draftee is ready to make the jump to the NHL.What do you guys think we do for our defense next year? I don't think we can move Krug and nobody will pay us the price we want for Parayko. So assuming those 2 stay we will have Parayko, Faulk, Krug, Leddy, Scandella, Rosen, Bortuzzo, Tucker, Perunovich.
I wish I had more confidence in our pro scouting, because for all of the discussion of needing a true #1 D (which could very well be true) I think a more viable path to a better defense is to target a non-premium asset that can fill the role that JBo had, but a little younger. A left D in the 27-30 year old range that can re-stabilize Parayko on a top pairing would be a great first step, then work on getting a #3/#4 LD to pair with Faulk so one of Leddy or Krug can hold down the 3rd pairing. If you can move both of Leddy and Krug in the next 18 months to help pay for the new guys (you certainly have to subtract at least one to make two adds), you can pencil in one of Tucker or Perunovich on the 3rd pairing and hope that one of Kessel, Lyle, Gaudet, Buchinger or a 2023 draftee is ready to make the jump to the NHL.
I still think there is a path to contention building around Parayko and Faulk on the right side for the next 4-5 years and either replace them or reduce their roles as they age out of being Top 4 quality, but I don't think any of that matters if we don't clean up our scheme, which will likely require changes to the coaching staff.
Stickland said we are interested in multiple NCAA free agents, and he followed this up with Snuggerud expected to stay at Minnesota for another year, so this isn't referencing him. I suppose that means a UFA or Beck. I wonder if Livingstone is high on the list given we can guarantee him immediate playing time.
Going back to the last time we pursued a big time college UFA dman, it would be nice if we could get someone like Dekeyser who could step in and adequately play 20+ minutes. I'm not including guys like Reinke, just the few elite college UFAs that are truly NHL impact ready. That would definitely change the dynamic of our rebuild/retool.