RationalExpectations
Registered User
- May 12, 2019
- 5,221
- 4,047
Troll ? Is Andeson also a Lemieux in progress ? Lemieux is a franchise player, no one sees Slaf as one.Slaf is a Mario Lemieux in progress. He's going to be a superstar
Troll ? Is Andeson also a Lemieux in progress ? Lemieux is a franchise player, no one sees Slaf as one.Slaf is a Mario Lemieux in progress. He's going to be a superstar
Sound advice. Hope the kid makes it!The difference for me is that Slaf clearly has exceptional raw tools and genetics in his favour, but he struggles with the game processing, mental aspects of the game, positioning, anticipation, reaction time.
I believe he’s going to be a very good player or at least should be, but I argue what we are doing for his development this year is actually hindering his ability to adapt. We’re asking him to learn these finer aspects in the toughest league in the world when there is a league a tier below the toughest where he would still learn, but have slightly more time and space to do it. We’ve already seen him get rocked countless times for not being aware or skating with his head down etc. Not to mention he’s barely getting any ice time to improve.
I can see gradually increasing his 5vs5 time, but the kid should be stapled to the first PP unit all year long etc. if Slaf succeeds it will be because he was just too damn good to be held back and nothing to do with this 10-11 min per night shit they’ve been feeding him. It’s been reminiscent of Michel Therrien and Claude Julien’s developmental plan, a hot mess.
Yep there are a handful in the league. I’m not sure this is a strong argument in Hutson’s favour. Even most of those are forwards. You can count the impactful 5’9 dmen on one hand. There’s a reason for that.Isn't Jared Spurgeon 5'9 and the Captain of the Minnesota Wild?
The issue is not the physical play per say, he has proven that he can play against men. It's the speed mixed with the physicality. That you only get in the NHL. I would be more concerned with him playing in the AHL. There are a lot more jabronis in the AHL that are just looking to light up youngsters.The difference for me is that Slaf clearly has exceptional raw tools and genetics in his favour, but he struggles with the game processing, mental aspects of the game, positioning, anticipation, reaction time.
I believe he’s going to be a very good player or at least should be, but I argue what we are doing for his development this year is actually hindering his ability to adapt. We’re asking him to learn these finer aspects in the toughest league in the world when there is a league a tier below the toughest where he would still learn, but have slightly more time and space to do it. We’ve already seen him get rocked countless times for not being aware or skating with his head down etc. Not to mention he’s barely getting any ice time to improve.
I can see gradually increasing his 5vs5 time, but the kid should be stapled to the first PP unit all year long etc. if Slaf succeeds it will be because he was just too damn good to be held back and nothing to do with this 10-11 min per night shit they’ve been feeding him. It’s been reminiscent of Michel Therrien and Claude Julien’s developmental plan, a hot mess.
Is this really true? I've never heard of this until this year.There are a lot more jabronis in the AHL that are just looking to light up youngsters.
Patience like... rushing a player to the NHL instead of letting him develop at his own pace after he proves he isn't fit to play in the NHL as an 18 year old (as Slafkovsky had a mediocre Rookie and Training camp, he did not prove he was fit to play in the NHL as an 18 year old).One thing that is often cited but quickly forgotten is patience. This year is a development year for our core young group. Trust the process - we finally have good people at the controls. Fans bases (not only Habs) are a bit bi-polar. They want development but then expect instant results. That's just not the way it works.
Is this really true? I've never heard of this until this year.
That’s a throwback name…not exactly a good oneAlexei Ponikarovsky 2.0, book it.
That's your own personal opinion not aligned with the club's view, they kept him in the NHL.Is this really true? I've never heard of this until this year.
Patience like... rushing a player to the NHL instead of letting him develop at his own pace after he proves he isn't fit to play in the NHL as an 18 year old (as Slafkovsky had a mediocre Rookie and Training camp, he did not prove he was fit to play in the NHL as an 18 year old).
Did you also say "trust the process, we finally have good people" in 2012? What makes you so sure they know how to develop prospects? Is there any evidence in Bobrov, Gorton, Hughes, or MSL's previous NHL experience?
Instant results like... rushing player to the NHL and hoping it works out well for him? That sorta "instant results"? Please tell me how it's meant to work.
Yes its a development year but we’re deploying him like we’re in a heated playoff race. We’re not. Ten minutes a night is stupid for this kid.The issue is not the physical play per say, he has proven that he can play against men. It's the speed mixed with the physicality. That you only get in the NHL. I would be more concerned with him playing in the AHL. There are a lot more jabronis in the AHL that are just looking to light up youngsters.
I also like the way MSL and the Habs are handling his development in the NHL. Good mix of spoon feeding and merit. Giving him 1st PP time without merit is just not realistic in pro sports.
One thing that is often cited but quickly forgotten is patience. This year is a development year for our core young group. Trust the process - we finally have good people at the controls. Fans bases (not only Habs) are a bit bi-polar. They want development but then expect instant results. That's just not the way it works.
No, it’s not true. Hasn’t been true for years.Is this really true? I've never heard of this until this year.
Patience like... rushing a player to the NHL instead of letting him develop at his own pace after he proves he isn't fit to play in the NHL as an 18 year old (as Slafkovsky had a mediocre Rookie and Training camp, he did not prove he was fit to play in the NHL as an 18 year old).
Did you also say "trust the process, we finally have good people" in 2012? What makes you so sure they know how to develop prospects? Is there any evidence in Bobrov, Gorton, Hughes, or MSL's previous NHL experience?
Instant results like... rushing player to the NHL and hoping it works out well for him? That sorta "instant results"? Please tell me how it's meant to work.
The veteran players on the Habs are rubbish and their quality has nothing to do with Slaf’s development or optimal career trajectory.That's your own personal opinion not aligned with the club's view, they kept him in the NHL.
Slaf belongs to NHL, he is better than some 'veteran' players on the Habs team.
Tough guy enforcers don’t typically play against much less get allowed to target finesse players. Even if they do, they’re usually slower and more undisciplined than the player they’re trying to hit. If Slaf cannot hold his own against borderline AHLers then he surely can’t be expected to play against NHLers.Yes, pretty much every AHL team carries at least one tough guy... ironically it seems to be a bit tamer down there this year... but traditionally you have a lot of veteran tough guy/ energy guy types partially because those players are not as sought after in Europe and the Europeans who can't make the NHL would prefer to play at home. Hopefully this will change so that the AHL is more like the NHL... it just might take a few more years.
Disagree that he hasn’t been good enough to take those minutes. He has. And that’s why his usage is so puzzling.The veteran players on the Habs are rubbish and their quality has nothing to do with Slaf’s development or optimal career trajectory.
Slaf is not capable of wresting quality minutes away from these rubbish players — so either MSL knows something and is making the right decision (ie MSL knows Slaf is not NHL material right now) or MSL is wrong and incapable of seeing Slaf’s NHL worthiness (ie MSL is not a good coach for Slaf right now) — irrespective of your view of Slafkovsky, both scenarios show that he is not in the right place right this moment.
Maybe it’ll change, maybe from next game on Slaf will show more and cement a place in the NHL. But so far he has not and has been put in a position with an elevated risk of catastrophic injury.
Tough guy enforcers don’t typically play against much less get allowed to target finesse players. Even if they do, they’re usually slower and more undisciplined than the player they’re trying to hit. If Slaf cannot hold his own against borderline AHLers then he surely can’t be expected to play against NHLers.
That's your own personal opinion not aligned with the club's view, they kept him in the NHL.
Slaf belongs to NHL, he is better than some 'veteran' players on the Habs team.
No it's not. Just because the haters post more often doesn't mean you're the majority. Quit your bullshit.Its the opinion of the vast majority.
It's only puzzling if you can't see the big picture: Slaf is too raw and not NHL-ready. He was too raw and not NHL-ready in Rookie Camp, he was too raw and not NHL-ready in Training Camp, he was too raw and not NHL-ready by game 9 when he should've been sent down, he was too raw and not NHL-ready the c. four times he got blown up and caught with big hits, and he continues to be too raw and not NHL-ready to date.Disagree that he hasn’t been good enough to take those minutes. He has. And that’s why his usage is so puzzling.
Again, I’d have started him in the minors and I’d put him there now… but regardless, I don’t like how he’s been used.
And what’s really weird is that MSL has done a great job with the kids overall. So why the difference with Slaf? I don’t know.
Yo why do you take critical and rational thinking as being a hater?No it's not. Just because the haters post more often doesn't mean you're the majority. Quit your bullshit.
Yes absolutely correct, MSL alluded about this when he, in a press conference or interview brought up the “slow” adaptation and integration of Stamkos… he had to start from the bottom and earn/learn his way up, same with what they are doing with Slaf…remember Aesop’s fable of the tortoise and the hare? When it comes to player development it is more advantageous to view things and take actions with a long term view, being narrow minded or shortsighted is ruinous.The issue is not the physical play per say, he has proven that he can play against men. It's the speed mixed with the physicality. That you only get in the NHL. I would be more concerned with him playing in the AHL. There are a lot more jabronis in the AHL that are just looking to light up youngsters.
I also like the way MSL and the Habs are handling his development in the NHL. Good mix of spoon feeding and merit. Giving him 1st PP time without merit is just not realistic in pro sports.
One thing that is often cited but quickly forgotten is patience. This year is a development year for our core young group. Trust the process - we finally have good people at the controls. Fans bases (not only Habs) are a bit bi-polar. They want development but then expect instant results. That's just not the way it works.
So rushing an 18 year old to the NHL to play 10-12 minutes and rarely in the 3rd period is pulling a Tortoise or a Hare? Was it Tortoise or Hare when the Habs did it with Kotkaniemi?Yes absolutely correct, MSL alluded about this when he, in a press conference or interview brought up the “slow” adaptation and integration of Stamkos… he had to start from the bottom and earn/learn his way up, same with what they are doing with Slaf…remember Aesop’s fable of the tortoise and the hare? When it comes to player development it is more advantageous to view things and take actions with a long term view, being narrow minded or shortsighted is ruinous.
Haters lmao.No it's not. Just because the haters post more often doesn't mean you're the majority. Quit your bullshit.
It's an inane analogy.So rushing an 18 year old to the NHL to play 10-12 minutes and rarely in the 3rd period is pulling a Tortoise or a Hare? Was it Tortoise or Hare when the Habs did it with Kotkaniemi?
Exactly right.It's an inane analogy.
How does the tortoise and the hare apply to Slaf?
Is he the tortoise, so he starts in the NhL and never speeds up?
Is he the hare, he starts off behind and never catches up?
Keep him in the NHL. I say this because I believe that the NHL is the best place to learn to adjust to the NHL.It's a simple question: If this is a decision point, what would you do with Slafkovsky right now -- send him down to the AHL or keep him in the NHL?
As usual, you’re way too over the top.It's only puzzling if you can't see the big picture: Slaf is too raw and not NHL-ready. He was too raw and not NHL-ready in Rookie Camp, he was too raw and not NHL-ready in Training Camp, he was too raw and not NHL-ready by game 9 when he should've been sent down, he was too raw and not NHL-ready the c. four times he got blown up and caught with big hits, and he continues to be too raw and not NHL-ready…