Prospect Info: [2022 - 1st OA] Juraj Slafkovsky (LW) Part 2

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
How many 1OA have impact their first season? The real question is whether it’s better to have that 1OA struggle in the NHL, dominate in junior, or play AHL. I doubt anyone knows.
Truthfully, most 1OA fwds have above 0.5ppg in their rookie seasons and go from there.

Edit: maybe I’m wrong but that’s how it seems
 
Last edited:
How many 1OA have impact their first season? The real question is whether it’s better to have that 1OA struggle in the NHL, dominate in junior, or play AHL. I doubt anyone knows.

Ummmm every hab fan knows…


When has it hurt a player to spend more time in junior or AHL?

I’m pretty sure having a prospect struggling to survive in the NHL is far worse. We’ve seen it many times.
 
He's NHL ready IMO. I'd be disappointed if he didn't play this year. From the videos I've seen the kid is strong and he's fast. I honestly haven't been this excited about a prospect since Saku.
I hope your ready to be disappointed
 
Let him play this season and be patient. He never had a dominating offensive season before. We all hope he will develop his potential but why send him to the AHL to be forced in a fight with a goon?
The only place he haven't dominated offensively last year is Liiga playing for TPS when he was used on the bottom 6 with grinders playing a defensive trap system. That was about 21 games of his 31 Liiga games. The last 10 (post-olympics), he had a ppg of 0.6. He dominated everywhere else he played last year.

Lookin at the RHP/Beck/Slaf line in scrimmage, Slafkovsky wouldn't be staying long in the AHL if he was sent down.
 
I'm not a fan of pre-determining that Slafkovsky is gonna play in the AHL before he's even had an opportunity to make the team.

He's your 1st overall pick, you let his performances dictate where he plays. If he plays well enough to make the team out of camp, it would be sending mixed signals to and him down to Laval.

I'm not a fan of rushing things for players but I'm also not a fan of stunting growth and progress.
 
I'm not a fan of pre-determining that Slafkovsky is gonna play in the AHL before he's even had an opportunity to make the team.

He's your 1st overall pick, you let his performances dictate where he plays. If he plays well enough to make the team out of camp, it would be sending mixed signals to and him down to Laval.

I'm not a fan of rushing things for players but I'm also not a fan of stunting growth and progress.
Agreed, treat it objectively. If he legitimately beats out other top 9 forwards for a roster spot, he’s earned it. Only objection is I would not let him stay as a 4th liner. But if he’s getting solid minutes and opportunity to play with top 6 players + PP time and producing reasonably (~0.5ppg) then you keep him up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sagikev and 417
I hope your ready to be disappointed
None sense..

People seriously underate his hockey iq.. he may take high risk opportunities sometimes but it doesnt erase all the high level skills he actually can pull off with ease.. among other things.. aside of his body being huge to protect the puck his hands are so skilled he could probably dangle a few player and get out of the corner even if he was smaller.. creating amazing lanes by actracting opposing players .. dont attack and he can burn you anyways.. he is raw for a potential superstar.. but in general head and shoulders above most.. non-pun intended..
 
Truthfully, most 1OA fwds have above 0.5ppg in their rookie seasons and go from there.

Edit: maybe I’m wrong but that’s how it seems
The last forward drafted 1st OA to have done so was Nico Hischier. Judging by the names to have been drafted recently, they've mostly disappointed (in the last 5 drafts). But if you look before that, you have incredible players such as McDavid and Matthews that went first overall and who had a ton of success in their rookie years. I don't think looking at the past necessarily is a good indicator of the future. Lafrenière has been lackluster so far, but that doesn't mean he won't step up in the next few years. Jack Hughes came off mediocre rookie and sophomore seasons to show that he can be a star in this league, if only he can stay healthy. I think looking at the draft only shows that there is no sure-fire way of predicting a player's trajectory. Unless you're a special talent, such as McDavid.
 
I look forward to seeing How Slaf reads the game when he is facing an NHL line up.
Most NHL players don't put out their total effort in the pre season.
I remember Guillaume Latendresse saying how intimidated he was when he stepped on the ice against Buffalo in his first NHL regular season game, the game was so much faster when the pre season ended.
Sh@t isn't real yet for Slaf, it will be soon enough.
 
The last forward drafted 1st OA to have done so was Nico Hischier. Judging by the names to have been drafted recently, they've mostly disappointed (in the last 5 drafts). But if you look before that, you have incredible players such as McDavid and Matthews that went first overall and who had a ton of success in their rookie years. I don't think looking at the past necessarily is a good indicator of the future. Lafrenière has been lackluster so far, but that doesn't mean he won't step up in the next few years. Jack Hughes came off mediocre rookie and sophomore seasons to show that he can be a star in this league, if only he can stay healthy. I think looking at the draft only shows that there is no sure-fire way of predicting a player's trajectory. Unless you're a special talent, such as McDavid.
Hughes only looks better than Lafreniere because he has been given better opportunities. For the most part Lafreniere has played with buttcracks. Hughes has been given good linemates, 1st line minutes, and PP time.
 
No it slides a year if he doesn’t play a minimum of 10 games in the NHL (which I think he does anyways).

I stand corrected….of course this only counts if you’re 18-19yrs of age.

Guess we haven’t had too many 18yr olds going to the AHL of late that had played no NHL games.

Thanks for bringing it to my attention
 
Ummmm every hab fan knows…


When has it hurt a player to spend more time in junior or AHL?

I’m pretty sure having a prospect struggling to survive in the NHL is far worse. We’ve seen it many times.
The habs don’t do development and they had coaches who trashed young guys. They did everything wrong.

For guys like Stamkos or Hughes I wonder if more time at lower levels would have helped.
 
The habs don’t do development and they had coaches who trashed young guys. They did everything wrong.

For guys like Stamkos or Hughes I wonder if more time at lower levels would have helped.

Stamkos nope. Guys had an incredible career outside of a few injuries. Will be a HOF. Hughes too soon to tell but he had a great season last year and he seems on pace to develop as a very good 1st line center at the minimum. Development can be done at the NHL level as long as the player is physically ready and mentally ready and as long as the coach understand that he has a kid in his hands. You can learn to play hockey at the nhl level while playing in the nhl.

I remember Keenan a few years ago apologizing for the way he treated Peter Zezel and while apologizing it was like he did not understand that back then Zezel was just 18 years old. If we keep Bustkovsky in the NHL MSL will have to be patient and defend him when the media complain about his lack of production the same way Gainey defended Brisebois when he was named GM. As long as MSL doesn't Therrien Bustkovsky and the kid is ready to learn and progress this is fine.
 
Last edited:
Stamkos nope. Guys had an incredible career outside of a few injuries. Will be a HOF. Hughes too soon to tell but he had a great season last year and he seems on pace to develop as a very good 1st line center at the minimum. Development can be done at the NHL level as long as the player is physically ready and mentally ready and as long as the coach understand that he has a kid in his hands. You can learn to play hockey at the nhl level while playing in the nhl.

I remember Keenan a few years ago apologizing for the way he treated Peter Zezel and while apologizing it was like he did not understand that back then Zezel was just 18 years old. If we keep Bustkovsky in the NHL MSL will have to be patient and defend him when the media complain about his lack of production the same way Gainey defended Brisebois when he was named GM. As long as MSL doesn't Therrien Bustkovsky and the kid is ready to learn and progress this is fine.
No question those guys are fine. I’m more curious as to whether their first seasons in the NHL helped or hurt. Hitting the NHL later might extend careers, too. The league is way rougher on player’s bodies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BehindTheTimes
Hughes only looks better than Lafreniere because he has been given better opportunities. For the most part Lafreniere has played with buttcracks. Hughes has been given good linemates, 1st line minutes, and PP time.
I think you should watch these 2 players play. Hughes controls the play when he is on the ice. Laf isn’t close to that yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad