Fantomas
Registered User
- Aug 7, 2012
- 13,803
- 7,651
Watching US destroy the Czechs now and shaking my head even more than before.
Such a shameful performance.
Such a shameful performance.
Yes and the best players in a country playing and living together as a team would make a great team. Yes skilled players of course. I would love to see a team of Canada’s best players living and playing under one system for a year. Of course that would be a pretty good team that will never happen so I don’t give it a lot of thought. Yakushev lives in the past is my point. Play the tournament under the same rules as other countries and stopped whining about the old soviet system of 60s, 70s and 80s. That system wouldn’t work now anyway. The game is played at a much faster rate by the top hockey nations.Well, at the time, Soviet hockey was recognised as the most skilled, that's true, isn't it? And no one will doubt that Tarasov's system changed the way hockey is played today. The way the Soviet players knew exactly where the partner was etc. is, by today's standards, still a feat, even though that style of play has already crept into the NHL and you see plays and goals of the sort occuring (granted, not every game).
best players living and playing under one system for a year.
Watching US destroy the Czechs now and shaking my head even more than before.
Such a shameful performance.
Next two games will be very telling of where Larionov fits. I'll be honest, a small part of me would like to see him fail badly so they can move on.. Although I still have some hope it was a one off and his team is capable of much more.Watching US destroy the Czechs now and shaking my head even more than before.
Such a shameful performance.
Looking how easy Americans take care of offensively challenged Czechs it is almost embarassing that Russia couldn't score on them. Larionov needs to go to a coaching school and not coach national team Russia. BTW apparently it was first time in 8 years Russia was shutout at WJHCs.
Don't forget how many people in Russian hockey he has insulted in the last 15 years and how little he has actually done to help!Yes, this is quite alarming. The "professor" doesn't have what it takes to build Soviet hockey, he's all about "fun" and glamour.
Yeah, or Orr, or Gretzky, or Lemieux, or messier, or, or, or. I can go on and on and play that game tooYou can invent the most elaborate systems, but the best hockey comes down to developing skill. There would be no Soviet hockey without skills of Kharlamov, Makarov, and Bure.
IMO - and it's totally ok. Lets give him time (2-3 years) and see what he can deliver. His team was fine during the Karjala Cup, so I wouldn't judge his coaching ability (we are not talking about his personal qualities here) by a few games. he thinks that he is trying to build something similar to the old Soviet system - good for him. I like when various coaches try various approaches with their junior teams. And honestly, I was tired of Bragin.Yep, I'm beginning to think that this WJC will be quite short with this kind of "Professor" at the helm.
Next two games will be very telling of where Larionov fits. I'll be honest, a small part of me would like to see him fail badly so they can move on.. Although I still have some hope it was a one off and his team is capable of much more.
I'm just curious - what you would expect this player to say? Larionov's tactics might have worked if not the horrid mistakes by the Russian D. The US couldn't do anything to the Czechs until they scored the first goal (and man, it was a very ugly one) The Czechs have probably the best defensive team in this tourney, but they have issues playing at par with top teams if they are trailing.We know in the second intermission one of the players was saying to keep doing what they were doing and things will start happening - I think the kid was just repeating what Larionov was telling them.
IMO - and it's totally ok. Lets give him time (2-3 years) and see what he can deliver. His team was fine during the Karjala Cup, so I wouldn't judge his coaching ability (we are not talking about his personal qualities here) by a few games. he thinks that he is trying to build something similar to the old Soviet system - good for him. I like when various coaches try various approaches with their junior teams. And honestly, I was tired of Bragin.
Looking how easy Americans take care of offensively challenged Czechs it is almost embarassing that Russia couldn't score on them. Larionov needs to go to a coaching school and not coach national team Russia. BTW apparently it was first time in 8 years Russia was shutout at WJHCs.
I'm just curious - what you would expect this player to say? Larionov's tactics might have worked if not the horrid mistakes by the Russian D. The US couldn't do anything to the Czechs until they scored the first goal (and man, it was a very ugly one) The Czechs have probably the best defensive team in this tourney, but they have issues playing at par with top teams if they are trailing.
Isn't it a contradiction
There goes yakushev living in the past again. Same old, every year. Soviet hockey superior to everyone and everything. It’s 2020 bud, time to come back to the real world. I do remember though that our totally outclassed talentless hockey team won that tournament.
Nope, you have me all wrong. My type? I’m a type now? Canada won the summit series even though they came into it overweight and out of shape. Even your vaulted Soviet system lost out to these overweight slugs.I was trying to explain "truisms" that were created by Canadian media to try to explain why Canadian hockey wasn't devalued, it was just that the Soviets were "robots," I get it that you are trying to defend your Canadian honor and masculinity. I don't take you as a guy who gets much into subtlety and nuance. You are a bump and thump kind of guy! I can hear you now at a hockey game: "Let's go boys, let's go boys. Let's go, eh! Let's go, boys! Boys, boys, boys, let's go, eh"! I know your type.
Canada won the summit series even though they came into it overweight and out of shape.