2021 NHL Draft Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,687
16,171
If Luke Hughes was a RHD I can see the Canucks targeting him. Even still, I can see the Canucks targeting Luke whose father...err... brother is here.
Yes, there's a possibility Luke Hughes could be in their wheelhouse when it's time to pick.

And it's an interesting question....what impact on Quinn's game would there be having his brother on the ice with him? Of course it wouldn't happen for at least a year, because I think Luke is committed to the Michigan for next hockey season.
 

The Iron Goalie

Formally 'OEL for Norris'
Feb 8, 2012
3,555
3,195
Langley, BC
Clarke should go 1st overall. Given how this season went though it's tough to say who will go where, but if I had the top pick I'd be taking Clarke.

I'm very high on Ceulemans. He does remind me of Makar, though doesn't have the ceiling that Makar had. I do think he ends up becoming a top 4 defenseman, from the right side, with high offensive potential. If we pick in the bottom half of the top 10 then I would absolutely be happy if we took him. Luke Hughes is another I'm high on, a left shot defenseman, but someone who I think is clearly a top 3 pick.

Very hesitant to take a guy like Owen Power...with these tall players the first red flag to me is are they being overrated because of their size? If they had the exact same skillset would this player still be ranked where he is? I still likely have him in my top 10, but not in my top 5.

Agreed re Power. I have both Clarke/Hughes ahead of him atm.

Also, I'd be ok trading down to pick Ceulemans... if it means acquiring another early 2nd/late 1st.
 

kcunac

Registered User
Aug 31, 2008
1,873
1,391
Ottawa
Luke Hughes is one of the youngest players in the draft. While there are still holes in his defensive game, he projects to be more of a 2-way defenseman than Quinn (which isn't saying much) and will also certainly be an offensive-minded defenseman. At his age, his season with the Wolverines, though short, was impressive, and before his injury he was first OV on many reputable scouting services' lists. Luke has more than enough going for him to not consider Nucks picking him to be nepotism, though he is likely 2 years away from the NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HockeyWooot

Catamarca Livin

Registered User
Jul 29, 2010
4,908
983
Luke Hughes is one of the youngest players in the draft. While there are still holes in his defensive game, he projects to be more of a 2-way defenseman than Quinn (which isn't saying much) and will also certainly be an offensive-minded defenseman. At his age, his season with the Wolverines, though short, was impressive, and before his injury he was first OV on many reputable scouting services' lists. Luke has more than enough going for him to not consider Nucks picking him to be nepotism, though he is likely 2 years away from the NHL.
I am starting to go against another offensive dman pick. I know BPA but if L. Hughes and B. Clark are not contributing to the pp are they making a big difference in 5 on 5 play. And if they are an in between player like Hanofin or Eric Johnson do you want to spend a high pick on him? Maybe Clarke is excellent 2 way dman? Otherwise I like the idea of Eklund. He looks like a quicker but less physical Hoglander. He makes good decisions with puck and hustles around the ice. I want Canucks to have this identity. If you have 2 puck retrieving wingers it is easy for a center to play in position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HockeyWooot

kcunac

Registered User
Aug 31, 2008
1,873
1,391
Ottawa
I am starting to go against another offensive dman pick. I know BPA but if L. Hughes and B. Clark are not contributing to the pp are they making a big difference in 5 on 5 play. And if they are an in between player like Hanofin or Eric Johnson do you want to spend a high pick on him? Maybe Clarke is excellent 2 way dman?

yeah i hear you. this team desperately needs defenseman that can actually defend. We need one for the Hughes pairing, and maybe even one on the Rathbone and Myers pairings. Hopefully Woo can play in the NHL in the next few years. At the same time, drafting 'defensive defenseman' is not a philosophy that turns out well often. I agree, would be happy with Beniers or Eklund in at anything over 4th OV. before then, i think we have to draft Clarke/Powers/Hughes and hope they will develop a better two way game. It is just way too hard to sign or trade for top pairing Dman nowadays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peen

JanBulisPiggyBack

Registered User
Dec 31, 2011
3,860
2,749
My top five are sorta interchangeable, I’m not overly passionate about anybody 1st overall ( I’m thinking Luke Hughes I dunno)
1-5
Hughes, Powers, Clarke, Eklund and Johnson

the next tier for me 6-8 are
Edvinson, Guenthier and Beniers

not a draft I wanna try and get a centre in and unless all of Hughes, Clarke, Powers, Edvinson are gone I hope we get Eklund

This feels like a draft where we actually blend BPA and positional need into our pick around 7-8

Clearly no consensus 1st overall and maybe the first time I am in favour of a trade down situation
Honestly worst decision but I am open to trading our 1st for the right player ( Seth Jones )
 
  • Like
Reactions: HockeyWooot

Bankerguy

Registered User
Apr 28, 2013
3,963
2,186
i think the Canucks will end up 8th worst? assuming that's where we pick, i think i'll be underwhelmed with the selection

Here are the players i'd love for the Canucks to draft.

Owen Power is a 6'6 top pairing guy. Left shot D. He'll munch minutes, put up points and shut down opponents. He'd be ideal. Exactdly what we need (too bad he's a left shot).
Luke Hughes, he'd be great too for obvious reasons. Might help us score brother Jack one day too if he ever hits the UFA market.
Brandt Clarke. Offensive, smooth skating 6'2 RIGHT shot Dman. I'd be happy with him too since he plays the right side.
Edvinsson, is a 6'4 left shot D who plays a heavy game and has good mobility. He would be a good pickup as well since his game would compliment the under-sized skilled guys like Hughes / Rathbone.
Dylan Guenther - He's the only forward that I really want. Elite offensive skills, strong two-way game, he isn't under-sized... good metrics.. Looks like a possible top line forward.

That's 5 guys. If we don't get a top 5 pick i'll be a bit disappointed. fingers crossed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HockeyWooot

Szechwan

Registered User
Sep 13, 2006
6,153
6,335
i think the Canucks will end up 8th worst? assuming that's where we pick, i think i'll be underwhelmed with the selection

Here are the players i'd love for the Canucks to draft.

Owen Power is a 6'6 top pairing guy. Left shot D. He'll munch minutes, put up points and shut down opponents. He'd be ideal. Exactdly what we need (too bad he's a left shot).
Luke Hughes, he'd be great too for obvious reasons. Might help us score brother Jack one day too if he ever hits the UFA market.
Brandt Clarke. Offensive, smooth skating 6'2 RIGHT shot Dman. I'd be happy with him too since he plays the right side.
Edvinsson, is a 6'4 left shot D who plays a heavy game and has good mobility. He would be a good pickup as well since his game would compliment the under-sized skilled guys like Hughes / Rathbone.
Dylan Guenther - He's the only forward that I really want. Elite offensive skills, strong two-way game, he isn't under-sized... good metrics.. Looks like a possible top line forward.

That's 5 guys. If we don't get a top 5 pick i'll be a bit disappointed. fingers crossed.
I have some hope that there will be some real reaches in the top 10, given how strange the scouting has been this season. Even at 6 or 7 I think we might have a shot at one of these guys. Hell, we came one pick away from snagging Zegras at 10 in a normal year.
 

Bankerguy

Registered User
Apr 28, 2013
3,963
2,186
I have some hope that there will be some real reaches in the top 10, given how strange the scouting has been this season. Even at 6 or 7 I think we might have a shot at one of these guys. Hell, we came one pick away from snagging Zegras at 10 in a normal year.
yes true. The fact that the rankings very A LOT depending on the publication, means that GM's likely have very different lists and one of those guys might fall to us.
 

Gstank

Registered User
Apr 27, 2015
5,319
2,966
I can see some of the teams ahead of us pulling the trigger on the goalie
If anyone ahead of us is going to take a goalie its Buffalo. But I think Buffalo is going to get at least 3 more 1st round picks in the next 2 years from Eichel and Reinhart. And at least one of those picks will be much lower then their current pick. The Other teams that I could see taking a goalie is Ottawa and Calgary but they committed long term to Murray and Markstrom
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,892
15,576
If we play like tonight the rest of the way we will definitely be top five. Should get us a really promising young D
 
  • Like
Reactions: LordBacon

Gstank

Registered User
Apr 27, 2015
5,319
2,966
Just for Fun here are what I think every team ahead of us in point % needs

Buffalo The completely depends on if they trade Eichel and Reinhart before the draft but I would think they get young Fs in return so the need D
Prediction: Power

Anahiem Forwards with a high offensive Ceiling
Prediction: Eklund

NJD Defense
Prediction: Clarke

Detriot IDK where they will go but I would Lean D
Prediction Edvinsson

Columbus First Line C
Beniers
 

JanBulisPiggyBack

Registered User
Dec 31, 2011
3,860
2,749
Just for Fun here are what I think every team ahead of us in point % needs

Buffalo The completely depends on if they trade Eichel and Reinhart before the draft but I would think they get young Fs in return so the need D
Prediction: Power

Anahiem Forwards with a high offensive Ceiling
Prediction: Eklund

NJD Defense
Prediction: Clarke

Detriot IDK where they will go but I would Lean D
Prediction Edvinsson

Columbus First Line C
Beniers

I’m not sure what I have heard but I think there isn’t a top line centre in this draft if I am not mistaken? Isn’t Beniers a guy who might need to convert to the wing in the NHL?
 

Gstank

Registered User
Apr 27, 2015
5,319
2,966
I’m not sure what I have heard but I think there isn’t a top line centre in this draft if I am not mistaken? Isn’t Beniers a guy who might need to convert to the wing in the NHL?

I believe Benier is projected to be a 2nd line C at the NHL lvl. Just because they arent projected as #1 guys doesnt mean they might not become one. I would like to know what a scouts critera is when they project players. I think it mainly has to do with him not having the offensive output but you can be a 60 point guy and still be a 1C IE Ryan Orielly and to a lesser extend Bo.
 

604

Registered User
Nov 1, 2011
7,390
1,617
I’m not sure what I have heard but I think there isn’t a top line centre in this draft if I am not mistaken? Isn’t Beniers a guy who might need to convert to the wing in the NHL?

Berniers is a legit centre but they say his game is more 2nd or 3rd line centre - heavy game. Think like Bo Horvat


Kent Johnson is a former centre who is playing wing, I think he could be a centre but kind of like Petey, he was playing college hockey at 165 lbs despite being over 6 feet tall. He played wing with Bernier as his centre but was a very good centre in the BCHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HockeyWooot

lawrence

Registered User
May 19, 2012
16,482
7,380
Haven’t heard anyone talk about North Vancouver’s Kent Johnson.

Any thoughts if we pick 6 to 11?

I wouldn't mind him in the 6th and later range. His parents are real estate agents and he has a history of liking Canuck related posts on Twitter. Probably a Canuck fan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NomadicCanadian

Fedz

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 18, 2003
3,934
350
Behind the Bench
Am I the only one that thinks we HAVE to pick a Dman ? There are 4 maybe 5 guys that will all be higher end D.

End of the day any of Clarke, Powers, Hughes, Edvinsson is huge coup for the Canucks. All four should become top 4 Dmen in the NHL.

I also agree with @y2kcanucks on his Ceulemans suggestion. I actually thought he may have played more consistently than Clarke at the u18’s.

Carson Lambos is also another kid that will be a very good NHL defenseman. His lack of a season and mystery illness/injury will drop him well outside our scope though.
 

JanBulisPiggyBack

Registered User
Dec 31, 2011
3,860
2,749
Am I the only one that thinks we HAVE to pick a Dman ? There are 4 maybe 5 guys that will all be higher end D.

End of the day any of Clarke, Powers, Hughes, Edvinsson is huge coup for the Canucks. All four should become top 4 Dmen in the NHL.

I also agree with @y2kcanucks on his Ceulemans suggestion. I actually thought he may have played more consistently than Clarke at the u18’s.

Carson Lambos is also another kid that will be a very good NHL defenseman. His lack of a season and mystery illness/injury will drop him well outside our scope though.

Defenseman all day

if those 4 are taken and we are drafting 5th it’s Eklund or trade back up to 5 spots

also getting a vibe we go off the board
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fedz

Mr. Canucklehead

Kitimat Canuck
Dec 14, 2002
42,543
38,044
Kitimat, BC
Am I the only one that thinks we HAVE to pick a Dman ? There are 4 maybe 5 guys that will all be higher end D.

End of the day any of Clarke, Powers, Hughes, Edvinsson is huge coup for the Canucks. All four should become top 4 Dmen in the NHL.

I also agree with @y2kcanucks on his Ceulemans suggestion. I actually thought he may have played more consistently than Clarke at the u18’s.

Carson Lambos is also another kid that will be a very good NHL defenseman. His lack of a season and mystery illness/injury will drop him well outside our scope though.

BPA always, but it sure looks like the BPA for us this year is going to be a defensemen - so it really ticks all the boxes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fedz

Luck 6

\\_______
Oct 17, 2008
10,302
2,008
Vancouver
Brandt Clarke would be ideal as we really need a top pairing capable RHD. If we draft another LHD, it pretty much caps one of Juolevi or Rathbone.

Hughes, 2021 LHD, Juolevi, and Rathbone is our LHD without even factoring in Edler sticking around a few more years in a reduced role. On the right side we have Schmidt (LHD), Myers, and I suppose potentially Hamonic if we re-sign him for another year or two. We could really use a difference maker with a high projected upside on that side.
 

CanuckleBerry

Benning Survivor
Sep 27, 2017
1,004
1,197
New Westminster
Looking more and more like we will be picking in the 8-10 range. Not terribly excited about that, because we really need one of those top D prospects. Virtually no chance now that we get a crack at Clarke, Hughes or Power. I also don't trust Benning to deftly handle trading down in this draft, so I hope we just take Ceulemens wherever we end up. A good skating right side D with size is something we direly need. Woo is literally all we've got in the pipeline. If there was some crazy way we could add another first and land McTavish too that would definitely have me excited.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad