RangerBlues
Registered User
Made a bunch of trades in draftsim. Thought this was a good mix of playmaking, 2 way, and beef.
View attachment 439909
It will be a goalie, two defensemen and a bunch of wings
Made a bunch of trades in draftsim. Thought this was a good mix of playmaking, 2 way, and beef.
View attachment 439909
Where are our “bloodlines” picks??1st -- Goalie
2nd -- No pick
3rd -- Medium sized guy with medium talent
4th -- Big guy can't skate, big shot, can't pass
5th -- Small guy can skate, can't shoot, can pass
6th -- Goalie
7th -- Cronyism
![]()
I would lmao if we won the lottery again. But if that improbable happens, then that pick might have a little more clout as far as getting an impact player.One of the thought processes before this draft was that you really need to keep the flow of talent coming --- especially knowing you're likely to have some really expensive contracts in Fox, Laf, Kakko, etc. So there was the belief that you want to make sure you still have a chance to cycle in support talent at reasonable costs.
Heading into this draft, the previous mindset was that the Rangers were going to keep stockpiling future support talent (an approach they really focused on in the 2020 draft) and that they didn't inherently need the most individually skilled player available. To some extent, I don't think that mindset will change too much.
Right now, one of the things that has me leaning toward the belief that they will keep the pick is that I don't know if they are going big game hunting via a trade right now. A lot of the types they could be looking at are probably of the depth and compliment variety --- not necessarily a guy you move a top prospect for or a first round pick.
That's not to say it won't happen. But you might be looking at a scenario where Stome and or Buch goes for multiple pieces and a different roster composition. In other words, you might be more likely to see Buch and Strome traded for less offensively inclined players for the middle six, with guys like Chytil and Kakko stepping up into roles, than you are likely to see a first and a prospect bundled for the same type of players.
Which is definitely a need with this organization.I'll have to watch him a bit more in depth, but from what I've seen briefly he shows a hard working game.
Looks like the Rangers pick is just out of range of the players we like. Hopefully we can trade up, if necessary.To follow-up on my previous post, here are some noticeable differences between CSB and Bob's sampling of scouts from a few weeks back. Some conversations I have are much, much closer to what Bob reported on. For example:
CSB has McTavish second for NA Skaters. McKenzie has him 11th overall.
Johnson is ranked third by CSB, ahead of a bunch of names that I've consistently heard as being higher on teams lists and reflected in Bob's rankings.
Guenther is ranked second by Bob, and that reflects a trend I saw where teams had him ranked significantly higher than third party observers. CSB has him sitting fifth among North American skaters.
CSB has Othmann 8th. McKenzie doesn't even have him in the top 20.
CSB has Wyatt Johnson at 16, just behind Pinelli (24th on McKenzie's list and a potential riser beyond that in talking with others). He's 52nd according to McKenzie's survey.
Colton Dach is 19, ahead of names like Dean and L'Heureux. Those guys were surveyed at 27 and 32 for McKenzie. Dach was surveyed somewhere around a third round slot.
There are always differences --- but these significant. I really can't wait to see where Bob's list goes from here.
You forgot that gordie will want a couple of goalies.Made a bunch of trades in draftsim. Thought this was a good mix of playmaking, 2 way, and beef.
View attachment 439909
Luke Hughes lol, top 10 player in the draft for sureI hope we draft a guy named Luke. Any good Lukes available?
So you’re saying we have a chance
Looks like the Rangers pick is just out of range of the players we like. Hopefully we can trade up, if necessary.
There are likely to be several names that have come up that will indeed be on the board at 15.
Now, how much of that has changed/will change under Drury is TBD.
But if the draft were held today, I think I'd be happy to come away with Pinelli at 15. He's my cross-section pick for the team in the sense that he could be among the BPAs at that spot in the draft, I think the potential and upside is very good, and he also happens to be fit an organizational need.
So to that point and maybe this cannot be answered, are the likes of Raty and Svechkhov now less likely with Bobrov gone?
Looks like the Rangers pick is just out of range of the players we like. Hopefully we can trade up, if necessary.
2021 lottery win
2022 lottery win
2023 lottery win
2024 we will be exempt but win the lottery with another team's pick acquired the previous summer
Lol, is that actually an allowable loophole?
I'm not a scout or anything, but from the limited amount of players I've seen, I've been really, really impressed with Francesco Pinnelli. He's the one I want at 16.
Was hoping that McTavish and/or Sillinger would drop. Then I’ve got Svechkov. Then Raty/Pinelli. Going back and forth there.I'm not a scout or anything, but from the limited amount of players I've seen, I've been really, really impressed with Francesco Pinnelli. He's the one I want at 16.
Lol, is that actually an allowable loophole?
To trade from 15th to the late 1st you mean? I would be fully on board with that. If there was ever a draft to do it, this is the one!
Looks like the Rangers pick is just out of range of the players we like. Hopefully we can trade up, if necessary.
Zachary Bolduc.....he seems intriguing...anyone have any opinions of him?