GDT: 2021-22 season game 79 LA Kings vs Chicago Blackhawks @7:30pm 4/21/22

[Telos]

Dang, Byfield can't buy a goal.

 

[kingsholygrail]

Hot potato time.

 

[Bandit]

Bifocals is cursed.

 

[tny760]

if nothing else, that was byfield's best shift of his career by far

 

[KingsHockey24]

What a shift by the Byfield line.

 

[Bandit]

Massive dominance and no goal, no penalty.

 

[HookKing]

Not sure to laugh or cry...

 

[RaymondReddington]

If that was against the Kings, would have been in their net no problem.

 

[Ziggy Stardust]

Byfield would have a hat trick by now if he buried all those chances. Nevertheless, nice to see him with an imposing shift.

 

[Sol]

Imagine if Byfield could actually hit the net. Dude misses the net so much that it’s actually insane. The amount of tap in goals he could have scored if he simply didn’t miss such easy opportunities. Insanity. Completely insane

 

[Bandit]

Not sure to laugh or cry...

Both.

 

[RaymondReddington]

Moverare missing the open net when 2-0 was a killer

 

[Cook24]

Frustrating a game of this magnitude, we’re dominating and it’s a one goal game…typical Kings though…

 

[AbsentMojo]

Ive been walking around my house bent in half to see what its like being Byfield, and man you cant breath.. hows he do it?

 

[Bandit]

Ive been walking around my house bent in half to see what its like being Byfield, and man you cant breath.. hows he do it?

Poorly.

 

[HartAU]

The offside was because there was no conclusive frame that showed both Hawks in the zone at the same time. It's a delayed offside situation given Kane wasn't playing the puck. As long as Kane touched up before the other Hawk went in, the play is onside. In one frame Kane is just short of the line, but the other Hawk hasn't entered yet. In the next frame, Kane is touching the blue, but now the other Hawk is in. There was no frame where both were in, therefore no conclusive evidence it was offside. Super close.

Nothing to do with Moore playing it in, it was a contested puck and it clearly came off both sticks.

 

[onlyalad]

They gave us a call on goalie interference the other day. Not going to admit they missed such on obvious offside today

 

[johnjm22]

The Kings solidifying themselves as one of the all time worst goals-above-expected teams.

They're trying to get to -50.

 

[Herby]

AA should be re-signed to another 1 year contract (if possible). This is not a player you give multi-years to but he is an asset to this team on 1 year deals.

 

[tny760]

In one frame Kane is just short of the line, but the other Hawk hasn't entered yet. In the next frame, Kane is touching the blue, but now the other Hawk is in.

damn quantum tunnels

 

[HookKing]

Without absolute proof the Kings (considering how good the Hawks pp was) had no business challenging that when they still had the lead.

 

[kingsholygrail]

Didn't Kane have to get outside of the blue line, not just to the blue line?

 

[HartAU]

damn quantum tunnels

To be fair, watching those replays, if it was a Kings goal resulting, I would want the call they got. So even though I tend to think it was probably JUST offside, it's inconclusive. I don't like that the announcement definitively says it is onside, Say it's too close and can't be overturned. That's a reasonable outcome.

 

[AbsentMojo]

The offside was because there was no conclusive frame that showed both Hawks in the zone at the same time. It's a delayed offside situation given Kane wasn't playing the puck. As long as Kane touched up before the other Hawk went in, the play is onside. In one frame Kane is just short of the line, but the other Hawk hasn't entered yet. In the next frame, Kane is touching the blue, but now the other Hawk is in. There was no frame where both were in, therefore no conclusive evidence it was offside. Super close.

Nothing to do with Moore playing it in, it was a contested puck and it clearly came off both sticks.

That sounds authoritative - you hear that from Toronto?

 

[Peter James Bond III]

Ive been walking around my house bent in half to see what its like being Byfield, and man you cant breath.. hows he do it?

Lizotte would probably love to be 6'1"...it seems that Byfield would love to be 5'10". What a shift, though.
He should be on #1 PP. Why not?