GDT: 2021-22 season game 79 LA Kings vs Chicago Blackhawks @7:30pm 4/21/22

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
To be fair, watching those replays, if it was a Kings goal resulting, I would want the call they got. So even though I tend to think it was probably JUST offside, it's inconclusive. I don't like that the announcement definitively says it is onside, Say it's too close and can't be overturned. That's a reasonable outcome.
But wasn't that the ruling on the ice?
 
To be fair, watching those replays, if it was a Kings goal resulting, I would want the call they got. So even though I tend to think it was probably JUST offside, it's inconclusive. I don't like that the announcement definitively says it is onside, Say it's too close and can't be overturned. That's a reasonable outcome.
yeah i'm not even mad about it

live i didn't think the touchup was even close, so i give em props upstairs for catching that it was actually a really close call

probably one of those that's worth challenging just to make them make the right call
 
Man, this is excruciating and typical :laugh:

AA should be re-signed to another 1 year contract (if possible). This is not a player you give multi-years to but he is an asset to this team on 1 year deals.

If he can develop some chemistry with Kopitar, sure. because he's proven to be utterly worthless outside the top six.
 
QB reminds me of a kid in youth hockey that grows 6" between seasons, and his parents havent sprung for the bigger pants and stick.. see it all the time
 
so bally shows up the freeze frame where it's clearly still in the process of being touched up but can't be bothered to click forward 1 frame

you had 15 minutes to get this done
 
  • Like
Reactions: mbar
whoever shot the puck in on the pp after it came out of the zone before the players had cleared.. is a numbskull
 
But wasn't that the ruling on the ice?
That's my point. Say that it's inconclusive, and therefore the call on the ice stands. I'd rather that than say "after review the play was onside." The review didn't prove that at all. It was inconclusive.
 
Kempe back to taking on-the-spectrum penalties... dont do that shit when you are fighting for one of the last spots
 
  • Like
Reactions: tny760
That's my point. Say that it's inconclusive, and therefore the call on the ice stands. I'd rather that than say "after review the play was onside." The review didn't prove that at all. It was inconclusive.
From you vantage. The review doesn't have to prove anything other than enough to overturn.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad