GDT: 2021-22 season game 79 LA Kings vs Chicago Blackhawks @7:30pm 4/21/22

HookKing

Registered User
Dec 12, 2008
8,795
2,580
To be fair, watching those replays, if it was a Kings goal resulting, I would want the call they got. So even though I tend to think it was probably JUST offside, it's inconclusive. I don't like that the announcement definitively says it is onside, Say it's too close and can't be overturned. That's a reasonable outcome.
But wasn't that the ruling on the ice?
 

tny760

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
20,347
22,161
To be fair, watching those replays, if it was a Kings goal resulting, I would want the call they got. So even though I tend to think it was probably JUST offside, it's inconclusive. I don't like that the announcement definitively says it is onside, Say it's too close and can't be overturned. That's a reasonable outcome.
yeah i'm not even mad about it

live i didn't think the touchup was even close, so i give em props upstairs for catching that it was actually a really close call

probably one of those that's worth challenging just to make them make the right call
 

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,314
66,065
I.E.
Man, this is excruciating and typical :laugh:

AA should be re-signed to another 1 year contract (if possible). This is not a player you give multi-years to but he is an asset to this team on 1 year deals.

If he can develop some chemistry with Kopitar, sure. because he's proven to be utterly worthless outside the top six.
 

tny760

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
20,347
22,161
so bally shows up the freeze frame where it's clearly still in the process of being touched up but can't be bothered to click forward 1 frame

you had 15 minutes to get this done
 
  • Like
Reactions: mbar

AbsentMojo

F-ing get up and hunt! Cmon Todd!
Apr 18, 2018
9,783
10,024
twitter.com
whoever shot the puck in on the pp after it came out of the zone before the players had cleared.. is a numbskull
 

HartAU

Registered User
Mar 28, 2014
154
84
But wasn't that the ruling on the ice?
That's my point. Say that it's inconclusive, and therefore the call on the ice stands. I'd rather that than say "after review the play was onside." The review didn't prove that at all. It was inconclusive.
 

HookKing

Registered User
Dec 12, 2008
8,795
2,580
That's my point. Say that it's inconclusive, and therefore the call on the ice stands. I'd rather that than say "after review the play was onside." The review didn't prove that at all. It was inconclusive.
From you vantage. The review doesn't have to prove anything other than enough to overturn.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad