KINGS17
Smartest in the Room
- Apr 6, 2006
- 32,582
- 11,766
1. Five Kings staring at the opposing player with the puck.10 million reasons we lost right there.
1. Five Kings staring at the opposing player with the puck.10 million reasons we lost right there.
Nah, I blame management for not trading him earlier.Kopi gets a bum rap because the organization has done such a crappy job finding his replacement. They didn't even have to find another HOF caliber player, even a guy like Barzal would have the fanbase saying how nice it is to have a guy like Kopitar on the 2nd line. Kopitar turns 35 this year, we should be thankful he is still able to play at a 2nd line level, many players were long cooked by then. He is obviously getting way worse, especially defensively, but that was going to happen.
Our fanbase shouldn't blame Kopi that he is on the 1st line at his age.
Taking the faceoffs doesn't mean you have to play center.Why would you put him on wing? The one thing Kopitar is still doing right is face-offs. He's near 60%.
Hes not scoring and his two way game isnt anything special this year. Whats the point then of revolving everything around him? If there wasnt Danult and Turcotte I wouldnt think of it. But there is and he only has a couple years left on his contract so why not start lessening his role. They wont be totally caught with their pants down this way when hes totally checked out and theyll have the pieces in place to take over.Why would you put him on wing? The one thing Kopitar is still doing right is face-offs. He's near 60%.
He certainly got away from Kopi's defensive coverage. Badum tish.
yeah, thats what I love about Durzi the most....the kid is decisive and quick about it
As much as I hate Karlsson and Burns, I'm totally envious at the way the get the puck off so quickly and accurately. Now imagine if Doughty had that in his game?
Mikey Anderson< Toby
I know I am going to be burned for this, but I will say it.
Why everybody is afraid/hate to admit that Mikey Anderson is not a very good player…
Muzzin sucked his first stint with the Kings. But then he played what a season and a quarter or so in Manchester and came up and was a different player. I think if he’s eligible Anderson could use some time in the A.Because he's still learning and adapting his game. He's hitting obstacles like Muzzin - over-commits and misreading the play. The hope is he continues to grow.
Muzzin sucked his first stint with the Kings. But then he played what a season and a quarter or so in Manchester and came up and was a different player. I think if he’s eligible Anderson could use some time in the A.
Seattle even having interest in Quick was a rumor...why would an expansion team want a 35-36 year old 'tender,he's not Terry Sawchuk,heck he's not even Martin BrodeurGiven those options at the time, if I didn't pick McDermid I think I would have taken Grundstrom, which says about all it needs to about the value of those players at that time. Odds are Seattle wanted us to fork over a pick to take Quick and we didn't take the bait thankfully.
He plays worse when hes with Doughty. He was great with Bjornfot this year and also Roy.I know I am going to be burned for this, but I will say it.
Why everybody is afraid/hate to admit that Mikey Anderson is not a very good player…
Can't hurtMuzzin sucked his first stint with the Kings. But then he played what a season and a quarter or so in Manchester and came up and was a different player. I think if he’s eligible Anderson could use some time in the A.
He plays worse when hes with Doughty. He was great with Bjornfot this year and also Roy.
When Doughty was out he and Bjornfot played really well as a pair especially considering they are young. But yea maybe great is the wrong word as Im not so high on Mikey. I do like Bjornfot a lot though. Hes a perfect partner for offensive dmen like Durzi.I do not believe he ever was great.
There is so many better roster defensemen or prospects on the team:
Doughty, Bjornfot, Durzi and Roy
Clarke, Faber, Grans, Spence and Moverare