johnjm22
Pseudo Intellectual
- Aug 2, 2005
- 20,998
- 17,923
I agree. I've been complaining about Kopitar's ice-time for years.Anze's last 5 games:
24:18, 21:56, 22:29, 21:09, 23:54.
For the last 5 games, that's more minutes than any forward in the NHL. AKA more minutes than many #1 dmen and the small handful of forwards getting more icetime (names like Kane, Ovechkin, McDavid) for the season aren't doing anything meaningful defensively or PKing.
It's atrocious management, especially when saddled with Brown. Both of those guys were visibly wobbly in a way I'm not sure I've seen in the NHL before and still got thrown out for OT.
Before the Danault signing, me and you had a little argument about it, where I said it wouldn't matter if they sign Danault if they don't change their player utilization philosophy:
Speculation: - 2021-22 LA Kings News, Rumors, Roster discussion part III
Speculation: - 2021-22 LA Kings News, Rumors, Roster discussion part III
And here we are.
I guess I was half wrong because Danault has been very impactful. But I was also half right in that signing him doesn't mean the Kings will change their utilization philosophy which is the main problem.
Look at the defense. I think it proves that Doughty never needed to play that ridiculous 26+ minutes a night. Kopitar should be playing 19 or less most nights.
And there's no reason why Kopitar even needs to be one of our primary PKers. Danault on PK1, and Lizotte on PK2 would be just fine. Yet Kopitar leads all Kings forwards in PK TOI. It's dumb.
Last edited: