I'm not comparing Kane to Caufield. But proclaiming someone currently playing 1st line at 20 is going to be a "one-note second liner at best" just seems a bit hyperbolic. If Caufield averages 40+ a year for the next decade do you amend your takes, or will it just be an empty 40 goals that doesn't help a team win? Is there anything Cole Caufield could do in his career to make you think he warranted a Top 5 pick?
And you were the ones who said absolutely that "They don't win", Patrick Kane has 3 Stanley Cup rings and a Conn Smythe and will go down as the best player on a mini-dynasty that won 3 cups in 5 years. Chicago very likely has zero Stanley Cups without Patrick Kane. Kucherov and Point won last year, if they win again this year Point is probably going to win the Conn Smythe.
What about Marian Gaborik? When he came to the Kings he was the definition of a one-dimensional player. He sure did score a bunch of meaningful goals for the Kings that run. The Kings probably don't win the SC in 2014 without that one-dimensional winger. Teams sure did seem to have a problem planning for him despite his flaws.
You are getting lost in your own strawman maze here. This discussion is about drafting players like Caufield very early in the first round instead of multi-tool players.
Kane was always a top prospect, head and shoulders above Caufield.
Gaborik was always a two way winger and excellent penalty killer. He doesn't fit into this discussion at all.
Kucherov and Point were late 2nd and 3rd round choices, nobody over-reached there. Not unlike Fagemo and Simontaival. Perfectly fine to take a chance there, but its worlds away from picking one at #5 when you have holes everywhere.
Lastly, no, offensive wingers are the easiest position in the league to fill and therefore have less value to a team than those who contribute on multiple fronts. They may be costly, but they are ALWAYS available.
Hyman does more for this team than Marner because the biggest weaknesses on this team is its inability to get the puck out of their zone on cycle defense, their inability to generate consistent offensive zone possession, their inability to forecheck, and their inability to hold leads. Marner doesn't help there, those are all his biggest weaknesses, and coincidentally Hymans strengths.
That is just short term, long term the Kings have drafted about 8 potential top 6 wingers over the past 3 drafts, but haven't drafted a single winger whose forte is solid board work.
Its not diffucult to understand unless you have a fetish for flashy scoring wingers.