Zezel’s Pretzels
Registered User
- May 25, 2019
- 711
- 1,091
I don’t get the Klim signing. That guy has done nothing to earn a one-way contract. I hope I am wrong, but I don’t get it.
Is it time that we admit Faulk is really good?
Most likely, it was that or he bolted for the KHL.I don’t get the Klim signing. That guy has done nothing to earn a one-way contract. I hope I am wrong, but I don’t get it.
I had the thought that it could be a precursor to him being a trade chip; glad a knowledgeable poster confirmed that I wasn't way out in left field. I sure hope that is the case. If he is anything other than forward #14 when the Blues are healthy, there’s a problem.Most likely, it was that or he bolted for the KHL.
Much rather keep him around than let him walk, but he needs to step it up if he's going to be an NHL'er.
Would not mind moving him in a trade, at all. And at that price, he's a decent trade chip.
McAvoy was 21 years old at that time."Let's not act like Parayko isn't as good as Seabrook these past 3 seasons?"
Really? The season before last, Parayko was playing with an injured back, and Seabrook was never anointed into the #1 spot in Chicago during his prime years. He had plenty of good partners like Keith and Hjalmarsson. He wasn't tasked to shut down the other team's top players with #5 guys like Mikkola and Scandella.
It's funny how quickly people talk up other team's players. Take McAvoy for instance who wasn't even the best defenseman in the cup finals. Petro and Parayko were clearly more impactful in that series.
I'd imagine there's a few teams that would claim him on waivers if he ends up there just to take a risk on a former 1st round pick.I had the thought that it could be a precursor to him being a trade chip; glad a knowledgeable poster confirmed that I wasn't way out in left field. I sure hope that is the case. If he is anything other than forward #14 when the Blues are healthy, there’s a problem.
I know, I know. Charts and data bad, watch the game nerd, etc.
That said, if Scott Perunovich doesn’t get a better look at the top 4 because we’ve got almost 8 million dollars locked up in Leddy and Scandella……lol
I’ve always been impressed out of what I’ve seen in Perunovich. My biggest question mark is staying healthy. I think it’s okay to shelter him on the bottom pairing to start.
I know, I know. Charts and data bad, watch the game nerd, etc.
That said, if Scott Perunovich doesn’t get a better look at the top 4 because we’ve got almost 8 million dollars locked up in Leddy and Scandella……lol
If he hadn’t shown what he had in the playoffs, I might agree, but I don’t see the point personally
It’s not Krug I want him pushing outHe showed me that he still needs to improve his defense and decision making. No one questions his offense and puck carrying skills but I see no need to rush him into the top 4. People like to crap on Krug but he's a much better defender at this point.
It’s not Krug I want him pushing out
I want Perunovich to force his way into a top 4 role
that would give us the ability to trade someone for cap relief OR we would have a very solid LD, especially transitioning the puck
MaybeAll of our fans want this. But right now it isn't close.
I know, I know. Charts and data bad, watch the game nerd, etc.
That said, if Scott Perunovich doesn’t get a better look at the top 4 because we’ve got almost 8 million dollars locked up in Leddy and Scandella……lol
Look at the chart. It's for zone exits. A thing Perunovich excels at.Lol any chart that says Perunovich was the best Blues defender last playoffs is beyond hapless. Do ... do you actually believe this? Shouldn't alarm bells about the value of this chart be going absolute bananas when you see something like that?