Adam Michaels
Registered User
He wants to quit a shitty team, just to sign with another one ? What is the point ?
It would be a trade. He's far from being a free agent.
He wants to quit a shitty team, just to sign with another one ? What is the point ?
I mean what do you guys expect the players to say? "No, we don't deserve to be here and we will make sure to suck and lose the series".Delusional team, from the top to the bottom.
It would be a trade. He's far from being a free agent.
It’s certainly confusing, but we are talking about the first pick drawing, no? As in, a chance for Lafreniere? We’d be Team A if we lose to Pitt, would we not?
It’s certainly confusing, but we are talking about the first pick drawing, no? As in, a chance for Lafreniere? We’d be Team A if we lose to Pitt, would we not?
Yet they are still a bottom 10 team after like a decade. Goes to show you what an embarrassment and joke of a sports team they are.
-I wouldn't want to be bottom 10 for a decade and have 2 players to show for it after they were given to me.
-I wouldn't want to be anywhere near that abomination of a contract that Skinner has.
-I wouldn't want to give a #1 C for a late 1st and cap dumps.
-I wouldn't want to be a place that is considered toxic and have my players lose passion for hockey.
-I wouldn't want to be the team that got embarrassed after not being able to trade Scandella and then another team is able to flip him for considerably more value.
The vast majority of Sabres fans would switch situations with us in a second and strongly disagree with you.
I mean what do you guys expect the players to say? "No, we don't deserve to be here and we will make sure to suck and lose the series".
The only "benefit'' we get is an obvious one... we retain our position if no qualified team (Phase 2) win the lottery.It’s certainly confusing, but we are talking about the first pick drawing, no? As in, a chance for Lafreniere? We’d be Team A if we lose to Pitt, would we not?
The rest are really nothing that great. Drouin, Domi, Gallagher, Tatar, Petry, Danault obliterate their depth, not even close. It's not like they planned to get Eichel/Dahlin by making smart moves, they have been absolutely terrible for like a decade and only have 2 elite players.-They have some good young players like Reinhart, Ristolainen, Jokiharju, Olofsson. Eichel and Dahlin are the elite ones, not the only good players.
Except Price and Weber are still great players while Skinner is terrible, I genuinely can't believe you are making this the same comparison. The guy got outscored by Nick Cousins for crying out loud and is getting paid 1 million less than Price.-Yes, Skinner's contract is really bad, he may bounce back or not. We also have bad long contracts, like Price and Weber. Around 18M for two old players past their prime.
Lol so Ristolainen is a good player but Drouin is Gomez. Ristolainen is the Drouin of Buffalo... Sergachev isn't a #1 D yet(if ever). It was a bad trade, but it's disingenuous to say it was as bad as giving up a #1 Selke and Conn Smythe winning center in his prime for a late 1st and taking on cap dumps or even the Gomez trade. I thought you were better than that.-Habs gave a future #1D for Gomez. We gave a young defenceman with a ton of potential for what's appears to be 50-point winger who can't defend.
I have yet to see guys Weber and Tatar say they have lost passion for hockey the way ROR and Eichel have.-I'll give you that, but let's not act like our locker room is perfect when our GM keeps talking about adding leadership and character.
What? It's not even close to the same thing. DLR was traded ONE YEAR after being waived. Scandella was traded months after.-Funny, because we waived DLR and he was traded for more value than what we got for Scandella.
There have been several Sabres fans coming here and saying that, some on mainboard, and you can even look at their board. They have been bottom 10 for a decade, it's not even close to the same thing. They are miserable, few of them even care about having another top 10 pick for the millionth time in a row.I doubt that, because we missed the playoffs 4 times the last 5 years and we have no elite talent to compensate for it.
That's why he made the lottery so complicated; Habs will win it and nobody will be able to argue cause it will remain too complicated.The habs making the playoffs == bettman settling up his debt for the John Scott fiasco?
The first draw is for the first pick. From what I gather there is about a 25% chance for a play-in team to win that, and of the play-in teams, we have the best chance with about a 25% chance of being that play in team.If a place holder wins any of the top 3 picks, there's phase 2 where all the teams eliminated from the play-in have an equal chance to get it.
Basically, Montreal gets f***ed over hard unless they manage to win the cup
The first draw is for the first pick. From what I gather there is about a 25% chance for a play-in team to win that, and of the play-in teams, we have the best chance with about a 25% chance of being that play in team.
Gotcha. Ya that is wack. Just need the hockey gods to come through for the first time in 27 years lolYeah but the Habs don’t get to keep that pick if Team A wins it. It just means there is another lottery to see who gets it.
The only "benefit'' we get is an obvious one... we retain our position if no qualified team (Phase 2) win the lottery.
Basically, if we lose to Pittsburgh and no qualified team get top 3 in the lottery, we retain 8. If one team (from phase 2) win top 3 and it's not us we drop one position to 9, etc.
So basically if we lose to Pittsburgh we get either 1,2,3,8,9,10 or 11. That being said, 11 position would be very unlikely as it means all top 3 were won by qualified teams and we did not get one of the top 3 picks in the 2nd lottery (at equal odd).
Basically this lottery was made to favor the likes of the Leafs/Rangers/Minnesota and unfavorable for the Habs/Blackhawks/Arizona (NJD)
The fact that the Leafs have equal odds than us on winning a top 3 picks is a joke.
Its insane to me that they don't simply just end the season right now and prepare for the draft and UFA season. Desperate for a buck I guess
Yet they are still a bottom 10 team after like a decade. Goes to show you what an embarrassment and joke of a sports team they are.
-I wouldn't want to be bottom 10 for a decade and have 2 players to show for it after they were given to me.
-I wouldn't want to be anywhere near that abomination of a contract that Skinner has.
-I wouldn't want to give a #1 C for a late 1st and cap dumps.
-I wouldn't want to be a place that is considered toxic and have my players lose passion for hockey.
-I wouldn't want to be the team that got embarrassed after not being able to trade Scandella and then another team is able to flip him for considerably more value.
The vast majority of Sabres fans would switch situations with us in a second and strongly disagree with you.
Watch Habs beat the Pens and then upset in the 1st round as usual and then get cracked in round 2.
The Montréal Canadiens are proud to select, from Bumsville, Idaho, Leslie McDud.
The rest are really nothing that great. Drouin, Domi, Gallagher, Tatar, Petry, Danault obliterate their depth, not even close. It's not like they planned to get Eichel/Dahlin by making smart moves, they have been absolutely terrible for like a decade and only have 2 elite players.
Except Price and Weber are still great players while Skinner is terrible, I genuinely can't believe you are making this the same comparison. The guy got outscored by Nick Cousins for crying out loud and is getting paid 1 million less than Price.
Lol so Ristolainen is a good player but Drouin is Gomez. Ristolainen is the Drouin of Buffalo... Sergachev isn't a #1 D yet(if ever). It was a bad trade, but it's disingenuous to say it was as bad as giving up a #1 Selke and Conn Smythe winning center in his prime for a late 1st and taking on cap dumps or even the Gomez trade. I thought you were better than that.
I have yet to see guys Weber and Tatar say they have lost passion for hockey the way ROR and Eichel have.
What? It's not even close to the same thing. DLR was traded ONE YEAR after being waived. Scandella was traded months after.
There have been several Sabres fans coming here and saying that, some on mainboard, and you can even look at their board. They have been bottom 10 for a decade, it's not even close to the same thing. They are miserable, few of them even care about having another top 10 pick for the millionth time in a row.