egelband
Registered User
- Sep 6, 2008
- 16,200
- 15,059
If you’re going to have a surplus at one position, RD is a pretty good choice.We have Trouba, Fox and Lundqvist on the way. There is nowhere for this kid to play.
If you’re going to have a surplus at one position, RD is a pretty good choice.We have Trouba, Fox and Lundqvist on the way. There is nowhere for this kid to play.
Absolutely nobody wants that but go offBloggers and Fanboys that want a fun sub 6 foot team and no grit: Why did we lose to Carolina?
Davidson and Gorton: We will show you why tonight
Bloggers and Fanboys: But we want Lapierre!
Let’s take a guy that will make us harder to play in three years!boo hoo
Let’s take a guy that will make us harder to play in three years!
That’s not the point. You said you want the Rangers to be harder to play against. How does a guy who has no chance of being on the roster in the near future help with that?boo hoo. Laf is 19 and Kakko isn’t much older.
Bloggers and Fanboys that want a fun sub 6 foot team and no grit: Why did we lose to Carolina?
Davidson and Gorton: We will show you why tonight
Bloggers and Fanboys: But we want Lapierre!
After further follow-up research...the Schneider trade-up pick is 100% comparable to trading up for K'Andre Miller.
Sooooooooooooooooooo..................
...I'm fine with it.
Let’s take a guy that will make us harder to play in three years!
I think he'll slip into the 40sNoel Gunler is sure falling
Is point 3 a short term target or is that the long game? Long game meaning next off season...A few thoughts here:
1. The Rangers-Calgary trade reflects the talks we've had around here about larger talks spurring smaller talks as a result of familiarity. But make no mistake, these two teams will continue talking.
2. The risk here for both the Rangers, and now Calgary, is that if Lapierre remains healthy he'll be a homerun pick. If he can't stay healthy, they'll both potentially look like winners.
3. The Rangers will be keeping very close tabs on their in-state neighbors to the northwest. And they will be stockpiling talent with an eye toward the horizon.
But...but the experts in here said that better talent was on the board and the NYR shouldn't have moved up, right? If all the smoke around the NJD and NYR loving Schneider as much as they did, you have to go and get your guy. That simple.Absolutely nobody wants that but go off
A few thoughts here:
1. The Rangers-Calgary trade reflects the talks we've had around here about larger talks spurring smaller talks as a result of familiarity. But make no mistake, these two teams will continue talking.
2. The risk here for both the Rangers, and now Calgary, is that if Lapierre remains healthy he'll be a homerun pick. If he can't stay healthy, they'll both potentially look like winners.
3. The Rangers will be keeping very close tabs on their in-state neighbors to the northwest. And they will be stockpiling talent with an eye toward the horizon.
We got the best player in the draft and people are still complaining lol.
Strome for 28 and call it a day.
A few thoughts here:
1. The Rangers-Calgary trade reflects the talks we've had around here about larger talks spurring smaller talks as a result of familiarity. But make no mistake, these two teams will continue talking.
2. The risk here for both the Rangers, and now Calgary, is that if Lapierre remains healthy he'll be a homerun pick. If he can't stay healthy, they'll both potentially look like winners.
3. The Rangers will be keeping very close tabs on their in-state neighbors to the northwest. And they will be stockpiling talent with an eye toward the horizon.