I think most people think he is the top pairing shutdown D type. And he's unique in that he does it with really high end skating. But he won't bring much offense or be a dman that can play on the PP. He seems like a Willie Mitchell type with a bit more upside then that due to his superior skating.
I wouldn't be too upset if we took him, because that type of player can have a big impact on the game. But I dont think he is top 6 as imo Laf, Byf, Stutzle, Drysdale, Rossi, Jarvis are all ahead of him. Sanderson is in that Next group of players that have question marks.
Raymond: is well rounded but put up the worst stats in the SHL out of Him, Holtz and Gunler (Raymond has put up slightly worse stats then Gunler the last two years)
Holtz: Best offensive upside out of the swedes imo. But questionable shot selection and from what I've heard he's pretty bad on the defensive end unlike Raymond.
Perfetti: mediocre speed, plays a real east west game, bad in his end and physically weak, but his hands, shot and playmaking are elite.
Lundell: bad skating but very high end production in a good men's league for past two years. Including the best Corsi at 65% in the entire league as a 18 yr old for what that's worth. He has Barkov level production due to extremely high hockey iq as the talent level isn't in the same league as Barkov.
So Sanderson is in that group of guys that we should be considering if worst case scenario occurs and we fall to #7. In that situation I don't mind Sanderson as his game will be effective in the NHL and I think he will eat lots of minutes. He won't have Ryan Suter offense but I can see him being a guy that can eat minutes and play a similar game if he hits his ceiling.