NHL Entry Draft 2020 NHL Draft Discussion - PART IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
56,756
34,567
Neither of Quinn/Sanderson are going to be available with the NYI pick so it's a moot point. So ignoring those two, I'd take Byfield/Raymond. We have a game breaking defender in Chabot (we might have 2 with Branstrom). Recent Cup winners have shown you need at least 2 game breaking forwards and right now we don't have any (Brady is heart before skill but we need two guys that can carry lines offensively - Malkin/Sid, Ovie/Backstrom, Marchand/Bergeron). The draft is still a crapshoot and Ottawa, while being better than average, does still whiff. Maximize the odds we get one by taking two Top 6 rated forwards. The reality is that 5 years from now Rossi/Lundell/Perfetti could all be better than Byfield/Stuzle/Raymond. Just play the percentages.

Really? The NYI pick could easily end up 15th and possibly even as high as 11th if everything goes just about perfect for us. I'm going to wait out till we know where the NYI pick lands before making plans on who to draft with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TkachukNorris79

TkachukNorris79

Registered User
Jan 27, 2018
1,491
1,364
Neither of Quinn/Sanderson are going to be available with the NYI pick so it's a moot point.
I don't really see the rationale behind this statement.

Since their hot start in the first 20 games, NYI is averaging 1 point per game (that's just ahead of Ottawa and SJ) , pacing them at 94 points. That won't make the playoffs. They're 8th worst in the league since then in goal differential at -17. They've been a bottom 10 team since November and I have no doubt in my mind that they will continue to show that. Plus 9 games on the road. But I guess they play the games for a reason.

In this case, assuming Laferniere, Byfield, Stutzle, Raymond, Drysdale, Rossi, Holtz, Perfetti, Lundell and Askarov go top 10, the odds of Ottawa getting Quinn/Sanderson with the NYI pick are pretty good. Zary, Mercer, Mysak, Gunler, Jarvis, Holloway, and Amirov could all be justified being picked from 9-15, in addition to Quinn and Sanderson.

Not sure why you make it seem like a guarantee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raze The Stray

Alf Silfversson

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
6,064
5,216
question for y'all:

Byfield, Drysdale and Quinn

or

Byfield, Raymond and Sanderson ?

That's a tough one.

I'm a huge Ryamond fan and a huge Quinn fan.

At the end of the day I think I'd go Byfield, Drysdale and Quinn.

I think that Quinn is actually closer to Raymond than Sanderson is to Drysdale. I, admittedly, haven't seen much of Sanderson though.

Would be very happy with both packages, TBH.
 

Sens of Anarchy

Registered User
Jul 9, 2013
67,160
52,892
question for y'all:

Byfield, Drysdale and Quinn

or

Byfield, Raymond and Sanderson ?


I am going to have to say YES to this.
If they take Drysdale, I'll be happy with Quinn .. If they take Raymond I'll be happy with Sanderson

The choice if there is one after already getting Byfield. Who do you take Raymond or Drysdale? I am taking Drysdale there but would definitely not be upset with Raymond.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alex1234

Shruggs Peterson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2017
1,904
1,101
What's the over/under on draft picks used to actually draft players in the first two rounds?

My guess would be 5
 

jhutter

Registered User
Dec 23, 2016
1,254
902
Still trying to understand the Byfield love. He's dropping everywhere but Sens Twitter/HFboards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crosside

jhutter

Registered User
Dec 23, 2016
1,254
902
Bad take deserves a bad response.

How is this a bad take? It's not my opinion that he's dropping, it's fact. He was almost unanimously the #2 pick six months ago, and now he's anywhere between 2nd and fifth, and is most often behind Stutzle at 3. I'm not weighing in on the quality of those mock drafts, I'm simply noting that he's falling.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,895
Visit site
Still trying to understand the Byfield love. He's dropping everywhere but Sens Twitter/HFboards.

You are trying to understand the love? He was the first overall pick in the OHL draft then won rookie of the year while leading his team to a division win and in scoring in his first season. He is 6'4 215, can fly and has a better ppg than Lafrenier, Rossi and Perfetti did/do as a 17 year olds. He is still the concensus number 2 its just that Stutzle has began to challenge him not because Byfield isnt a good prospect just that Stutzle is very good as well.
 

jhutter

Registered User
Dec 23, 2016
1,254
902
You are trying to understand the love? He was the first overall pick in the OHL draft then won rookie of the year while leading his team to a division win and in scoring in his first season. He is 6'4 215, can fly and has a better ppg than Lafrenier, Rossi and Perfetti did/do as a 17 year olds. He is still the concensus number 2 its just that Stutzle has began to challenge him not because Byfield isnt a good prospect just that Stutzle is very good as well.

He's actually not the consensus #2. There are plenty of mocks that have him anywhere from 2-5. Hell, NHL.com listed him as third a few days ago. I'm not saying that he shouldn't go #2, my guess is as worthless as everyone else's guess on here.

And yes, I am trying to understand the love. Not long ago it wasn't uncommon to see posts on here where it was suggested that he should go ahead of Lafreniere.

The "but he's younger than (insert player here)" didn't work out so well with Tkachuk.
 

Alf Silfversson

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
6,064
5,216
He's actually not the consensus #2. There are plenty of mocks that have him anywhere from 2-5. Hell, NHL.com listed him as third a few days ago. I'm not saying that he shouldn't go #2, my guess is as worthless as everyone else's guess on here.

And yes, I am trying to understand the love. Not long ago it wasn't uncommon to see posts on here where it was suggested that he should go ahead of Lafreniere.

The "but he's younger than (insert player here)" didn't work out so well with Tkachuk.

At the start of the year there was some talk that Byfield MIGHT be able to overtake Laf as the #1 pick. Laf has been lights out so it hasn't happened.

If you can't understand that a 6'4, 215 lb player who can fly and is scoring at a rate similar to Stamkos and Tavares in their draft year is coveted, then I don't think anyone can explain it to you. And he's doing this as one of the youngest players in the draft.

Yes, being younger does play into the equation somewhat. While we're all fans of Brady let's not act like he's the steal of that draft. Younger players like Dahlin and Svechnikov have shown a lot more growth in their games than BT has this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bert

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,857
7,829
Centres go higher then any other positions so Safe bet Byfield goes #2.
 

stempniaksen

Registered User
Oct 12, 2008
11,167
4,492
Still trying to understand the Byfield love. He's dropping everywhere but Sens Twitter/HFboards.

You're kinda getting skewered, but it's a fair question, imo. You're not the first person to remark that QB's perceived value/upside may be higher on these boards than the consensus.

I still have QB as my clear cut #2, so I may be just as guilty as the rest of this board when it comes to (at least slightly) overvaluing him. Given that his main competition is Stuzle who plays in the DEL it may just be that a lot of us haven't seen enough of Stuzle to put him over Byfield honestly. Probably doesn't hurt that he's the prototypical 1C and that's the biggest position of need for this franchise as well.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,895
Visit site
He's actually not the consensus #2. There are plenty of mocks that have him anywhere from 2-5. Hell, NHL.com listed him as third a few days ago. I'm not saying that he shouldn't go #2, my guess is as worthless as everyone else's guess on here.

And yes, I am trying to understand the love. Not long ago it wasn't uncommon to see posts on here where it was suggested that he should go ahead of Lafreniere.

The "but he's younger than (insert player here)" didn't work out so well with Tkachuk.
Maybe you should watch him and yes he is still the concensus number 2 just because some people dont have him there doesnt mean that majority dont think that.
 

jhutter

Registered User
Dec 23, 2016
1,254
902
At the start of the year there was some talk that Byfield MIGHT be able to overtake Laf as the #1 pick. Laf has been lights out so it hasn't happened.

If you can't understand that a 6'4, 215 lb player who can fly and is scoring at a rate similar to Stamkos and Tavares in their draft year is coveted, then I don't think anyone can explain it to you. And he's doing this as one of the youngest players in the draft.

Yes, being younger does play into the equation somewhat. While we're all fans of Brady let's not act like he's the steal of that draft. Younger players like Dahlin and Svechnikov have shown a lot more growth in their games than BT has this year.

You're (purposely?) misunderstanding what I am saying. I clearly said "I'm not saying he shouldn't go #2...", so I'm not sure where the condescending tone is coming from.

Regarding BT, you're again misunderstanding what I said. I have no idea how you can gather that I'm insinuating that he's the "steal of the draft" because I pointed out one of this board's most significant rationales for selecting Zadina over him.

Scouting isn't a science, and none of us really know what the hell we're talking about. It constantly amazes me to see the confidence that some people have in their scouting opinions.

You're kinda getting skewered, but it's a fair question, imo. You're not the first person to remark that QB's perceived value/upside may be higher on these boards than the consensus.

I still have QB as my clear cut #2, so I may be just as guilty as the rest of this board when it comes to (at least slightly) overvaluing him. Given that his main competition is Stuzle who plays in the DEL it may just be that a lot of us haven't seen enough of Stuzle to put him over Byfield honestly. Probably doesn't hurt that he's the prototypical 1C and that's the biggest position of need for this franchise as well.

The only opportunity I've had to see both players play at the same level was the WJC, and Stutzle looked to be a step ahead. Of course there are significant variables that allowed this to happen. With that said, there are variables that allow Byfield to look to be a step ahead of Stutzle, as you point out.

Maybe you should watch him and yes he is still the concensus number 2 just because some people dont have him there doesnt mean that majority dont think that.

I'm glad that you're the awthority on what concensus means.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,895
Visit site
He's dropping because of a tournament that people love to overrate and somehow being big is a bad thing these days.

Only on HF is being big a bad thing now, shows how asinine this place can really be. Yes big players that cant move are no good in this NHL but big players that can skate are going to be even more effective.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad