Prospect Info: 2020 NHL Draft 1st Overall Pick, Alexis Lafreniere, LW

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think this is almost easy to forget. We have some big boys, and they aren't pylons either.

Lafreniere is heading toward 6'2, 210 territory. His fellow first round classmate Schneider around 6'2, 215. Kakko should play at 6'2/6'3, 215ish. Chytil is 6'2, 210ish. Miller will play at 6'5, 220-225. Robertson 6'4, 220ish. A guy like Cuylle will be in the 6'3, 215 range if he pans out.

Then you have guys like Zibanejad and Kreider on the roster. Obviously they have size and strength to go with the skills.

This could be a very heavy and a very mobile team to play against in pretty short order.

Yep the combination of size and strength is something the Rangers have never really had. You look at the cup winning Kings team and they had a bunch of forwards and D like that and in a 7 game series nothing wears you out like strong, well conditioned athletes that play hard in all 3 zones.
 
He turned himself into a more complete player, got his conditioning where it needed to be, and became the player that most people now remember.

Some guys get it a little later. Some guys never get it. We see that even now on our own roster. Zibanejad and ADA are examples of guys who put the pieces in the right place and reaped the rewards with their second and third organization respectively.

You know I never even realized it got that bad. I remember how in 1994 he was a solid player that played big minutes, played hard and was just a solid all around defenseman. Then for whatever reason by the next season in the playoffs he looked like he had no interest in playing against the Flyers. I always believed he was injured or something; now I realize he had probably checked out and had written his ticket out of NY.
 
You know I never even realized it got that bad. I remember how in 1994 he was a solid player that played big minutes, played hard and was just a solid all around defenseman. Then for whatever reason by the next season in the playoffs he looked like he had no interest in playing against the Flyers. I always believed he was injured or something; now I realize he had probably checked out and had written his ticket out of NY.

Keenan rode Zubov very, very hard. You could argue it both ways. On the one hand, maybe he rose him too hard and that was a contributing factor. On the other hand, maybe that’s exactly what Zubov needed.

But even then, Zubov wasn’t quite known as a self-starter.
 
I believe you are referring to Zubov - Mess was absolutely wrong. Zubov was a great player and a warrior. Too bad Mess didn't see that cause he was more like Mess then he was given credit for. Zubov took hits to make plays and played as physical as his frame would allow him too. An excellent hockey player!
I loved Zubie!
He and Leetch on the PP was amazing to watch.
 
Having size is great, but you need the skill to back it up. Laf has the skill, as does Kakko, but a lot of the guys listed haven’t really shown to be skilled players. Kreider is a physical specimen, but leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to skill. I’d rather smaller players who are skilled than physical specimens who aren’t. Gretzky was the GOAT in spite of his body. It was his skill and mind that made him great.

I think we’re putting too much emphasis on the size of the team and not enough emphasis on the skill. The league is now more reliant on skill than the physical aspect of the players, and I don’t think anyone can argue against that. I’m concerned that management is going against the trends and that it’ll hurt us. It reminds me of Moneyball from a decade and a half ago. No one really follows the traditional baseball scouting anymore because we’ve learned the Moneyball method is best.

Laf is not the issue. It’s guys like Schneider and picking him over a Lundqvist or ADA that may prove more problematic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buchnevich89
Having size is great, but you need the skill to back it up. Laf has the skill, as does Kakko, but a lot of the guys listed haven’t really shown to be skilled players. Kreider is a physical specimen, but leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to skill. I’d rather smaller players who are skilled than physical specimens who aren’t. Gretzky was the GOAT in spite of his body. It was his skill and mind that made him great.

I think we’re putting too much emphasis on the size of the team and not enough emphasis on the skill. The league is now more reliant on skill than the physical aspect of the players, and I don’t think anyone can argue against that. I’m concerned that management is going against the trends and that it’ll hurt us. It reminds me of Moneyball from a decade and a half ago. No one really follows the traditional baseball scouting anymore because we’ve learned the Moneyball method is best.

Laf is not the issue. It’s guys like Schneider and picking him over a Lundqvist or ADA that may prove more problematic.

Lol what? I don't think you can really make an argument that they're too focused on size and not skill when they're a season removed from shelling out 11.6 million a year for a 5'11" 170lb forward.

They have plenty of skill. They finished top 5 in GF last year, that wasn't done by accident. People are just excited that they're adding the size to go along with it.

You need balance everywhere. Schneider isn't going to be chosen over ADA (thats going to be a money casualty) but he most likely will be chosen over Nils for the sole reason that you can't ice a defense filled with a bunch of sub 6 foot guys.

Edit: Every year the playoffs are proof that you still need some size and players who excel in the muckery. When was the last time a pure skill team accomplished anything?
 
Last edited:
Lol what? I don't think you can really make an argument that they're too focused on size and not skill when they're a season removed from shelling out 11.6 million a year for a 5'11" 170lb forward.

They have plenty of skill. They finished top 5 in GF last year, that wasn't done by accident. People are just excited that they're adding the size to go along with it.

You need balance everywhere. Schneider isn't going to be chosen over ADA (thats going to be a money casualty) but he most likely will be chosen over Nils for the sole reason that you can't ice a defense filled with a bunch of sub 6 foot guys.

Edit: Every year the playoffs are proof that you still need some size and players who excel in the muckery. When was the last time a pure skill team accomplished anything?
I mean the Scary Good Sabres didn’t really win anything but they were sure as shit the funnest team ever.
:laugh:
 
Having size is great, but you need the skill to back it up. Laf has the skill, as does Kakko, but a lot of the guys listed haven’t really shown to be skilled players. Kreider is a physical specimen, but leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to skill. I’d rather smaller players who are skilled than physical specimens who aren’t. Gretzky was the GOAT in spite of his body. It was his skill and mind that made him great.

I think we’re putting too much emphasis on the size of the team and not enough emphasis on the skill. The league is now more reliant on skill than the physical aspect of the players, and I don’t think anyone can argue against that. I’m concerned that management is going against the trends and that it’ll hurt us. It reminds me of Moneyball from a decade and a half ago. No one really follows the traditional baseball scouting anymore because we’ve learned the Moneyball method is best.

Laf is not the issue. It’s guys like Schneider and picking him over a Lundqvist or ADA that may prove more problematic.

Much of what you say is true. However, a team full of small players, no matter who skilled can get hit out of a game. You need size to win the battles in the corner and in front of the net. Anyway, most of the forwards that they've drafted who are larger have plenty of skill - Laf, Kakko, Chytil and others have skill. You mention Kreider and state alot to be desired when it comes to skill? Seriously? Kreider is a consistent 25 goal/50 points a year player. Those don't grow on trees. Then you mention Braden Schneider - you do realize that he is an excellent skater. Just because he doesn't put up huge points doesn't mean he can't/won't be a very solid contributor. In the last decade Chara hit 40 points only once but was nominated for the Norris on 5 occasions. That's not a skilled player. Schneider probably isn't the next Chara but to say he doesn't deserve to play over Lundqvist or ADA without seeing him at this level is a little harsh.
 
Much of what you say is true. However, a team full of small players, no matter who skilled can get hit out of a game. You need size to win the battles in the corner and in front of the net. Anyway, most of the forwards that they've drafted who are larger have plenty of skill - Laf, Kakko, Chytil and others have skill. You mention Kreider and state alot to be desired when it comes to skill? Seriously? Kreider is a consistent 25 goal/50 points a year player. Those don't grow on trees. Then you mention Braden Schneider - you do realize that he is an excellent skater. Just because he doesn't put up huge points doesn't mean he can't/won't be a very solid contributor. In the last decade Chara hit 40 points only once but was nominated for the Norris on 5 occasions. That's not a skilled player. Schneider probably isn't the next Chara but to say he doesn't deserve to play over Lundqvist or ADA without seeing him at this level is a little harsh.

Chara is an exceptionally skilled player.
 
Chara is an exceptionally skilled player.

Chara was/is skilled in defensive zone coverage, skilled in the corners and in skilled front of the net. Skilled in reading the forecheck and making a great first pass. He was/is skilled like Larry Robinson or Jan Erixon were skilled - not like Paul Coffey or Mark Messier were skilled. That is what I interpret the original poster trying to say. Maybe I'm reading it wrong!
 
That Leetch at center thing should be up there with the horse meat story

But it shows how strange certain journeys can be in sports.

Sometimes we become so accustomed to players being HOF caliber talents that we forget how the story began.

Leetch eyed as a possible center, Messier being so raw he shifted to LW, things of that nature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR
Having size is great, but you need the skill to back it up. Laf has the skill, as does Kakko, but a lot of the guys listed haven’t really shown to be skilled players. Kreider is a physical specimen, but leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to skill. I’d rather smaller players who are skilled than physical specimens who aren’t. Gretzky was the GOAT in spite of his body. It was his skill and mind that made him great.

I think we’re putting too much emphasis on the size of the team and not enough emphasis on the skill. The league is now more reliant on skill than the physical aspect of the players, and I don’t think anyone can argue against that. I’m concerned that management is going against the trends and that it’ll hurt us. It reminds me of Moneyball from a decade and a half ago. No one really follows the traditional baseball scouting anymore because we’ve learned the Moneyball method is best.

Laf is not the issue. It’s guys like Schneider and picking him over a Lundqvist or ADA that may prove more problematic.
I somewhat agree. Every attribute is important to me besides shot and top-end speed (I prefer agility, acceleration, and overall mobility instead of speed, but obviously I wouldn’t be mad if the player had great speed). I think the pendulum is swinging the other way, and some fans are now UNDERrating size. But anyways, to me, skill is still the most important attribute, but you hope you can also get some mobility, size, and hockey sense along with that skill.
 
Interesting. As I was reading your posts about how he had issues even in Dallas I was trying to figure out who the Stars brought in after his first season to whip him into shape but Hitchcock was already the coach by the time Zubov got there but Carbonneau was too. I guess it just took time to get through to him. It definitely worked--Zubov averaged more than 30 minutes a game during the 99 playoffs when Dallas won the Cup.
what ever happened to Carbonneau?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad