Axl Rhoadz
Binky distributor
- Apr 5, 2011
- 5,343
- 3,959
Just stay the plan....we really gonna have 3 players on the team making 10+ million dollars/year?
I'm on the no side of the fence. A team doesn't go from consecutive bottom 5 finishes to the playoffs on the strength of adding one player. It's on the strength of the core players, culture and buy-in. The team is developing that right now. Our 2012 team had been trending up for 3 consecutive seasons before taking the plunge and cashing in the assets. I'm not about upsetting that apple cart. The team is about 1 or 2 seasons away from making that move.
I like Eichel and if the FO makes the move, I won't cry about it depending on what goes the other way. But will there be enough left over to emulate the Cup teams? At 24, Kopitar was a better player than Eichel is now. So he's your Kopitar replacement and current Kopitar slides into the Richards slot until he ages into Stoll's slot. Who is the Carter replacement? Are people forgetting that he averaged 27 goals a season his first 5 seasons in LA? 27 year old Dustin Brown? His numbers declined after 2012 under Sutter, but it's obvious that was on Sutter in retrospect. How about Justin Williams? We're talking about Doughty just entering his dominance and we're talking top 2 defender in the league for almost a decade dominance. Quick at his full powers. Those lineups were ridiculous looking back.
The point is that one player isn't transforming this lineup. It's going to take a lot more than that. You're doing a lot of projecting as it is on the prospects even with Eichel in the mix. Well, Byfield/Turcotte likely will not be as good as Eichel is the argument, yet you're putting your eggs in the basket that Vilardi, Kaliyev, Madden, Kupari, et al are going to turn into Carter, Williams, Brown, etc and quickly. It's too early in the rebuilt and Eichel is not a transformative player. The caveat is if you can get him for a steal and I'm not even sure what that is.
Only one thing ur totally missing is the production of the replacement players Your version has 3 players getting no points at all. I also don't see 150 points from thoses 4 players Totally unrealistic imoSo say conservatively about 150 points spread throughout a deep lineup for one 90 point player, huh?
Too early to trade for Eichel. There are several pieces who need to mature, particularly on the blueline.
Why does everyone endure the suckage just to rush into mediocrity again?
Only one thing ur totally missing is the production of the replacement players Your version has 3 players getting no points at all. I also don't see 150 points from thoses 4 players Totally unrealistic imo
I’m so confused by this line of reasoning. Can players not develop on winning teams? Will Anderson and Bjornfot and Faber and Grans etc etc all the sudden stop development because the Kings have the second best 1/2 punch in the game?
Could wingers like AK and Madden and Kupari (he becomes a wing in this scenario) not hit their peaks playing with a 2 top 10 centers in the league?!?
Eichel is no Gretzky. The Kings traded for Carson at age 24 and his best days were already behind him. Eichel probably peaked last year with his 15.9 shooting percentage against his career normal 8-10 percent. Eichel is just 44% on faceoffs in his career. He only has 2 more point than Iaffalo playing 20 minutes a game. Eichel would get less minutes in LA so less production. Players tend to produce less when traded to LA so his 72 point for a full season projection for this year turns into maybe 55-60 points. If he gets married and has kids, does his production drop down into the 40s? Plus, he might screw up team chemistry like when the Coyotes traded for Hall last year. No thanks.I agree, 100%. It's like the Kings, when they traded Carson, Gelinas, 3 1st rounders and 15 million cash for Gretzky. The Kings were a worse team than they are today, when they did that deal. It helped, getting McSorley and Krushelnyski
in the deal. But, the Kings didn't have anyone to play with Gretzky....just Luc and Nichols. Krushelnyski helped some. Adding Kurri was big and then dealing Nichols for Granato and Sandstrom, gave Wayne good wingers to play with.
The Kings had terrible prospects and lost 3 1st rounders, to boot! Carson and Gelinas were 19 and 18 yrs old. They had NO future incoming talent and a bad roster, to boot.
The current Kings are not a bottom 5 team. It's not a fluke, they are 8-6-3 and the last 10+ games last year, they were winning. Plans change, when special opportunities arise. It's like having $25,000 in savings and
seeing Bitcoin when it was at $4,500 (early 2020) and saying 'that's too pricey for my plan, so I will have to adhere to the plan and wait for the next bitcoin' Good luck, finding the next Bitcoin, as 1 yr later,
JP Morgan and Musk are buying and it's $58,000. That train left. Sure, it's dropped to $49,000, so then sell and make 10x your investment, or sell what you put in, so you have no loss.
Giving up 2 top prospects, 1 roster player, 1 next level prospect and a #1 or even 2 #1's....for an Eichel at 24 yrs of age, opportunity comes around less than once every 5 years. Or never. The Kings had a worse roster
at the time of the Gretzky deal and ZERO elite prospects and lost 3 #1 picks. YES, they did not win the Cup, but came close in 93. I still do that trade. Gretzky was 27. Eichel is not Gretzky, but he's an elite player
at 24. It's not like he's 29 and cannot be part of the incoming youth. Does Eichel make the Kings a contender? Most would say no, but I say it's possible. ..and if not, they will certainly make the playoffs.
Eichel isnt that good.
Only one thing ur totally missing is the production of the replacement players Your version has 3 players getting no points at all. I also don't see 150 points from thoses 4 players Totally unrealistic imo
Okay, let's extrapolate:
Byfield/Turcotte - 60 conservativelyy
Iafallo - 50, Kempe 35-40
Walker - 30
1st round pick - depends on the position, but you think 10 is unrealistic?
And by your logic you wouldn't be subtracting the points earned by the player who would have Eichel's role either. Eichel gets 90, Byfield or Turcotte get 60, you are only gaining 30 points.
The players likely to replace Byfield/Turcotte, Iafallo/Kempe and Walker would either be even younger players who will take longer to mature or you using more cap space on free agents or more assets on vetetans.
It's a net loss no matter how you look at it.
I'm not on board in theory but I can be convinced if the package is right, I'm just not seeing it.
It is just something to talk about before the game. A new subject in this forum is always welcome imo. I do agree thou its not likely going to happen in seasonwe are spending too much time on it given if Buffalo even moves him it likely won't be till the offseason, and even then remote chance it is LA he gets moved to
I’m so confused by this line of reasoning. Can players not develop on winning teams? Will Anderson and Bjornfot and Faber and Grans etc etc all the sudden stop development because the Kings have the second best 1/2 punch in the game?
Could wingers like AK and Madden and Kupari (he becomes a wing in this scenario) not hit their peaks playing with a 2 top 10 centers in the league?!?
No, but the Kings don't need to boost their center depth. Why trade away key pieces in weaker positions, with assets we're still trying to get NHL ready, to be a slightly better team now?
Again. Why are we enduring years of suckage just to trade away core future pieces away the moment the Kings aren't dropping in the standings?
No, but the Kings don't need to boost their center depth. Why trade away key pieces in weaker positions, with assets we're still trying to get NHL ready, to be a slightly better team now?
Again. Why are we enduring years of suckage just to trade away core future pieces away the moment the Kings aren't dropping in the standings?
Again where would we get weaker? Kings are absolutely loaded at basically every position right now (except goal, prospect wise). Especially if it’s all futures.
That said, there really is no need to go forward if you think adding Eichel to this team only makes them slightly better. We clearly are watching 2 different players.