Prospect Info: 2019 Prospects PART 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

4Twenty

Registered User
Dec 18, 2018
9,987
11,831
Past play history and age.
Fact is he has.
Already explained it.
Wrong thread. And No its not even close and you know as well that the team took their BPA in McCann.
Kinda disingenuous considering the very thing you were claiming wasn't happening is exactly what you just did.
So hope....
Fact is he lead the gold medalists blueline in ice time per game. Watch the games, don't count the stats....that's how you get stuck with Juolevi's.
Uh, the GM targeted a 24 year old dman in the trade, the trade hinged on getting Sbisa to replace Garrison, there's video support of this. Yeah, they moved McCann with a very high 2nd for another Sbisa in Gudbranson. I don't know it's the wrong thread, krutov was the one who brought up Duchene and ROR.
I don't see how you and krutov complaining about negativity and pessimism is me moving the goal posts. Nor is it disingenuous. The original goalposts, was that that piss poor group was considered a "plethora of riches". The goal posts are still there, I don't think it's a plethora of riches. Krutov does. The poster who made the avalanche comparison liked my post stating that it wasn't to compare, but to illustrate what a "plethora of riches" looks like.
 

krutovsdonut

eeyore
Sep 25, 2016
17,680
10,415
No? I'm a Canucks fan just like you. I guess you're implying I have some kind of agenda, but no agenda here.
I love our U25 forward group but I'm worried about our U25 D group and hope it gets better so we can be a contender.


I didn't say we're better or worse than the rest of the league. All I said is I don't see any young top 4 D in the organization aside from Hughes and maybe Woo, and I pointed to Colorado as an example of what a real plethora of riches looks like.
Comparing U25 groups is better than comparing 'prospect pools'. We have a good young forward group because guys like Pettersson are already in the NHL, so I don't see the point of excluding young NHL players.

I'm not "trashing prospects", I'm trying to project realistically who's gonna be a top 4 D man.
Woo I could maybe see - the rest of the guys I just don't see it. I like defensemen who are good in their own end and think it's a pre-requisite to be a top 4.
Who do you think is likely to become a top 4?
Different story with our forward prospects, where you can realistically project guys like Madden or Podkolzin or Hoglander becoming a top 6.



I didn't mention anything about this, nor did I criticize management for not having a better pool. You seem to have implied that yourself.
All I said is I don't see a lot of promise in our young D-men pool regardless of why that is.

ok, well if you want to shift the discussion from prospects to u25 players on and off the roster, here are a few comments

-probably not the right thread to discuss it.
-it's generally a mug's game trying to project a top 4 dmen from a developing prospect who is not yet in the nhl. i don't see any reason to single out woo as a better candidate. he's still in junior. i don't see any reason to trash brisebois' chances at 22 when he has a fairly complete game lacking only the mental element which we know can turn on like a light switch. either of them could be 1000 game nhlers or not.
-it's premature to be worrying about a u25 dcorp when horvat is the only core member approaching 25.
-it is however, absolutely correct to say we don't know what we have yet for a young defensive core to match our forward core, and this a worry. it would be nice if a player or two emerged asap.
-i think that's a fairly predictable outcome of where we are in the cycle. dmen do take longer.
 

Raistlin

Registered User
Aug 25, 2006
5,153
4,148
I think the 'plethora of riches' comment triggered all the negative nellies on HFcanucks.... god knows we cannot use optimistic lexicon here. From now on, only cautiously optimistic posters who hedge on the worst possible scenarios can post without snarky rebuttals when prospects are concerned.
 

Scumbag Frank

Hard Time in the Slammer
Apr 13, 2010
780
761
Vancouver
It was a pessimistic dismissive post though.

Tryamkin could easily be as effective as Zadorov by next season.
Rafferty is tearing the AHL up and may need some defensive work but you think Timmins doesn't need some work also. He's slowed considerably after a nice start. Rafferty could be as good or better given his adjustment to pro hockey 24 or not. No one thought Dan Boyle was gonna be much at 24. I would be careful capping a player on his curve.
Byram i love but he's had a poor draft +1 season so far regressing in production (20pts in 30 games) and not exactly dominating the U20s (2 assists in 7 games) Lets wait till he dominates the AHL before we throw him way ahead of Juolevi who everyone seems to think regressed in his draft +1 but did better than Byram has to date. I will say Byram is a superior skater which may make all the difference but in 2017 people were projecting Juolevi too so....
Graves has been a nice find also but i dont exactly see him as a stud going forward...he's having a bit of an anomaly year so far. He's solid for 1 year after 260 games in the AHL. We'll see
Brisebois and Sautner are not the same player. Brisebois can really skate. His career will be defined by mistakes and puck moving. Yes likely a depth guy but it's lazy and erroneous to just toss him and Sautner into the same pile.
Woo i'm not a huge fan of but he's pretty mature and solid could be a Carlo type if everything goes perfectly. That's a BIG IF he can adjust to NHL speed.....i'm really skeptical
I'm more a fan of Utunen than Rathbone. Both are interesting long shots

It's easy to project but as we've seen over the years don't cash cheques till these guys are actually good NHLers. The Avs young D is probably as good as it gets but as Krutov said it cost them a Conn Smyth #1 C in O'Reilly and Duchene. It's not like they just drafted them without those currencies as well as adding scoring up front.

If the point is the Avs have built an incredible group of young D then sure everyone would agree. If the point is the Canucks are doing a poor job relative to the Avs then give the Canucks the O'Reilly Duchene returns and re compare. I'm not sure what creating that comp really shows other than the Avs correctly used that currency to address a horrible defense.

Agree to disagree on Tryamkin vs Zadorov. I think Zadorov is a #4 and Tryamkin is a #6.

Yes it's possible Rafferty figures it out, but reports from Utica seem to indicate he's not improving defensively. Can't play top 4 in the NHL if you're not at least average defensively. Guys like Dan Boyle are the exception, not the norm.

No one would trade Byram for Juolevi right now. As you say, Byram could become another Juolevi yet but it's not a likely outcome and it hasn't happened yet, so as of now Byram has way more value.

Graves I don't know much about but he's putting up good point totals and Avs fans like him. And he's playing regularly in the NHL, which I have a hard time seeing most of our prospects doing.

But even if Brisebois becomes a Biega or a Fantenberg, that's a guy you can sign for league min as a UFA or get on waivers every year. I don't put any value in that.

I take Carlo types over Gostisbeheres all day long. Probably why I think highly of Woo, who is still a long shot as you say.

As I mentioned in my post above, I wasn't commenting on how the Avs got those D or why the Canucks don't have them. That's a different discussion.
 

4Twenty

Registered User
Dec 18, 2018
9,987
11,831
I think the 'plethora of riches' comment triggered all the negative nellies on HFcanucks.... god knows we cannot use optimistic lexicon here. From now on, only cautiously optimistic posters who hedge on the worst possible scenarios can post without snarky rebuttals when prospects are concerned.
Do you see that group as a "plethora of riches"?
 

Grantham

Registered User
Mar 28, 2017
1,417
1,509
That was a nice article by the hockey writers posted by freemcdavid.

It reminded me about Rathbone, who I'm always intrigued by, but always tend to forget as he is far away from putting on a Nucks jersey. I think he could be real special player for us. He as a dynamic quality in his skating and movement which you don't find often in late round picks. If he plays the full 4 years for Harvard, how long do we hold his rights?

Rafferty too I'm quite high on, and Lind has had a huge bounce back year. Juolevi we'll see how the poor guys body holds up.

Overall it was an encouraging article for sure!
 

M2Beezy

Objective and Neutral Hockey Commentator
Sponsor
May 25, 2014
46,660
32,640
Palestine 🇵🇸
That was a nice article by the hockey writers posted by freemcdavid.

It reminded me about Rathbone, who I'm always intrigued by, but always tend to forget as he is far away from putting on a Nucks jersey. I think he could be real special player for us.

Rafferty too I'm quite high on, and Lind has had a huge bounceback year. Juolevi we'll see how the poor guys body holds up.

Overall it was an encouraging article for sure!
And thats without mentioning the top three prospects Podz Hoglander and Madden!

Man I love this team :yo:
 

sting101

Registered User
Feb 8, 2012
17,116
16,485
Agree to disagree on Tryamkin vs Zadorov. I think Zadorov is a #4 and Tryamkin is a #6.

Yes it's possible Rafferty figures it out, but reports from Utica seem to indicate he's not improving defensively. Can't play top 4 in the NHL if you're not at least average defensively. Guys like Dan Boyle are the exception, not the norm.

No one would trade Byram for Juolevi right now. As you say, Byram could become another Juolevi yet but it's not a likely outcome and it hasn't happened yet, so as of now Byram has way more value.

Graves I don't know much about but he's putting up good point totals and Avs fans like him. And he's playing regularly in the NHL, which I have a hard time seeing most of our prospects doing.

But even if Brisebois becomes a Biega or a Fantenberg, that's a guy you can sign for league min as a UFA or get on waivers every year. I don't put any value in that.

I take Carlo types over Gostisbeheres all day long. Probably why I think highly of Woo, who is still a long shot as you say.

As I mentioned in my post above, I wasn't commenting on how the Avs got those D or why the Canucks don't have them. That's a different discussion.
Fair.....just some difference of opinion here that's fine. It's extremely hard to project even with draft positions. No one would ever dispute Pouliot over Krug back in 2012

Zadorov has mostly been 3rd pair this year...Tryamkin can play 3rd pair next year and no one would blink an eye. Both huge Russians who can skate with limited offensive skill. Hard to project who grows into a bigger role as they mature? And yes he's not signed yet so .....

Anyways your post is well taken. I have very much the same concerns and so do most of the astute fans here that realize we have nothing pushing Myers Edler and Tanev out the door as things are. I also share the opinion that a Carlo type would be exactly what we need not a offensive guy considering Myers and Hughes penchant for jumping in the play. Interesting times ahead for sure. Cap space could dictate a year of using Rafferty Tryamkin and Juolevi Brisebois anyway so it's possible we have a different vision this time of year next season or were pushing for a big trade or signing.

As far as the Avs....yes that's the deepest crop of young dynamic types of any team. That team is now loaded up and should be pushing the chips all in soon. MacKinnon if i had to start a march to the Cup this year would be my 1st pick.
 

Snatcher Demko

High-End Intangibles
Oct 8, 2006
6,058
1,524
Do defensemen need to "dominate" in the AHL though? There are so many good defensemen in the NHL who didn't (seemingly to me) dominate the AHL, rather they were found to be good in the AHL right away (within 1-2 seasons), and good enough to develop further in the NHL.

Vancouver in particular, has an interesting history with failed 1st round picks for defensemen, but finding gems who were drafted (or undrafted) and developed later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,609
9,919
This is the prospects page. You guys are talking about Vancouver D-prospects.
This is a point I have had an issue with for years.

You guys are arguing about the current pool. I'll address that in a moment.

What about the D-prospects that have been assigned to the farm where the prospects are supposed to develop if they are not instantly NHL ready. That group has numbered 3 in 3 different seasons, Hutton, Stecher, and Hughes.

- The Comets came into being in 2013-14.
The team's D were provided by the Gillis administration. The prospects in that group were Henrik Tommernes (1st NA pro season, but 4th season of pro hockey - 3 in the SHL, 23), Peter Andersson (2nd year of his ELC and 22, Yann Sauve (3rd pro season, 23), Frankie Corrado (a rookie but on the 1st of a 2yr ELC as they burnt the first year off in Vancouver at the end of '12-13 season, 20), and Alex Biega (not really a prospect having played 4 yrs at NHL Harvard, and 3 yrs prior in the AHL with Portland and Rochester, 25).

In this Group Biega was a good D-man and Andersson despite having no physicality whatsoever was also decent. Corrado was the real prospect and Vancouver thought so also and Benning would continue with that thought.
Tommernes would be surpassed by others in the Utica lineup in 2014-15 and seek and receive his release.
Sauve was the worst AHL D-man I had ever seen.

- '14-15 was Benning's first season in control and Lorne Henning was in his 2nd season as Utica's GM.
The only D-prospect newcomers to the past season's roster were Andrey Pedan and Adam Clendening, both acquired in trade in season. Adam played 11 regular season games and the playoffs and was traded in the off season to Pittsburgh. Pedan played 43 games and then was concussed and missed the remainder of the season and all of the playoffs. Biega and Corrado were both stellar in the playoff run to the finals.

- '15-16 saw the arrival of Ashton Sautner and Jordan Subban. Sautner was signed to an ELC by Benning as an undrafted free agent. Subban had been drafted in the 4th round in 2013.
As the teams7th/8th D-man, injuries and call-ups would see Sautner play 50 sheltered games, but hold his own.
Subban would be an offensive AHL rookie standout, but his play in his own zone was equally the opposite.
Corrado would be lost to waivers before the season actually began.
Biega would begin a 3-yr run spent mostly in the NHL with Vancouver.
Pedan would play 13 games with the Canucks and get tried at LW. The experimaent was a failure and when he returned to Utica he was never the same effective D-man that left.

- '16-17 would only see Evan McEneny as a new prospect. He had been signed by Benning in 2013 after not getting drafted in 2012 when he only played 2 games before a season ending knee injury. He was reassigned to Jrs for an overage season in 2014-15, spent 2015-16 in ECHL Kalamazoo and missed half the season with another knee injury. He was now an AHL rookie after a long round about way getting there. He played 64 games and really came on offensively in the later part of the season.
Subban would be named to the AHL All Star team by virtue of his offensive prowess, but his D was not much improved.
Pedan was still a basket case and would find himself scratched at times, playing 52 games. He would be traded in the offseason.
Sautner logged 47 games and was still treading water.

- '17-18 saw the arrival of Guillaume Brisebois and Jalen Chatfield. Both rookies paired with veteran defenders looked pretty good. Nothing near top AHL defenders, but got the job done in most instances.
Brisebois occasionally showed an offensive spark, but only logged 18 points (15 were assists) in 68 GP while Chatfield revealed a lack of offensive prowess despite being able to carry the puck and get into offensive positions, 7 points in 60 GP.
Sautner finally became a regular and was decent at it. Again nothing to write home about but a steady job at the AHL level.
McEneny suffered another knee injury in November and thus only played 18 games.
Subban was traded to LA after only 16 GP for Nic Dowd.

- '18-19 saw Olli Juolevi as the only new prospect and only 2nd drafted D-man by Benning to see Utica. Hutton was not a Bennning draft and Stecher was not drafted.. He would only play 18 games before being lost for the season with a knee injury.
McEneny was having a stellar comeback season with 31 points in 58 GP before suffering yet another season ending knee injury.
Sautner was having his best season before suffering several serious facial injuries in November as the result of an illegal high hit and would be lost for nearly 2 months. He would still get a late season call from Vancouver and things were looking brighter for him
Brisebois also had an improved season and also got a late season look in Vancouver.
Chatfield suffered a foot injury, lost half a season and once again proved to have a lack offensive acumen and his defensive game fell off as well.

- '19-20 The Comets are still missing a Benning drafted D-man other than Brisebois and Olli Juolevi. They have 4 rookie D-men on the roster.
Juolevi is still considered a rookie by the AHL since he only had played 18 games at the start of the season. There is improvement, but his turning, skating, and defensive zone decision making are still problems. Better now than 20-25 games ago.
Rafferty is a 24-yr-old rookie professional. It goes without saying that he is have an outstanding offensive season. He has been named to the AHL All Star team for exactly that reason. There are many defensive flaws in his game that he has gotten away with through the luck of the hockey gods. Sometimes a d-man's turnover becomes a goal, somtimes it's stopped by the keeper, sometimes it's rescued by his partner, and sometimes a forward coming back bails him out. Brogan has been front and center for all of that help. He is still weak defending the crease. He doesn't use his physicality very often. He is walked with relative regularity. His positioning in his own zone is often incorrect. This is all correctable, e.g. if his feet are actually good and therefore he can make the turns to avoid being walked; he makes better decisions and doesn't make all the bad passes; he stops throwing blind passes into traffic lanes hoping the man there will be one of his. I think you get the picture. Some guys get these things ironed out and others never do. For him to make it at the next level, the iron needs to get heated up. The forecheck and pressure is much harder and most of the skaters are faster making the need for quicker decision making and quicker and more accurate passing. The blind pass has to become a thing of the past.

Eliot and Teves have miles to skate before an NHL chance can be seen. Eliot has passed Teves by in the past few weeks and it is obvious any time one of them is penciled in. Eliot also has a quality shot.

Sautner has taken not one, but several steps back from where he was at season's end last year and where he is right now. His gaffes just keep increasing in number and the really good plays he makes can't make up for them.

Brisebois is in a similar pattern.

Not having a veteran or at least real good, experienced d-man in house and instead relying upon these 2 guys to be the rocks on defense has failed and they are suffering the consequences of such poor plan making at the management level.

So, the Comets are playing in their 7th season and thus far only 2 Benning drafted defenders from his 6 drafts have been assigned to the farm, Juolevi and Brisebois. The number of D-men, whether in the system when he arrived, drafted by him, signed by him as free agents, traded for by him, or any other conceivable means you can think of has produced one player from Utica to become a regular member of the Vancouver Canucks. We are not talking short call-ups, but a full time regular roster member. That one player was Alex Biega, whom many believe is still a better choice than one, if not both, of Benn and Fantenberg.

This is obviously not a management team that believes in building within the system. They have traded guys from the farm for "NHL ready players". Sometimes they have been ready and other times they have been dismissed when it proved to be incorrect. Jim seems intent upon acquiring players who go directly onto the Vancouver roster and any who don't, don't seem to be considered any longer than a single season.

Thus, I look to see Juolevi, Rafferty, and a forward in the name of Lind either get a shot or end up on the trading block. Most of his AHL asignees are already considered out of the picture. If they don't knock his socks off in their brief stays in Vancouver, they become yesterday's old news. So, these are the only guys I think he's maybe interested in because they are producing and won't cost him anything more than peanuts towards the cap.

Sautner, Brisebois, Chatfield, and maybe even MacEwen now, are off the books. I think Gadjovich and Jasek are also out of the future picture. Lockwood's current year in Michigan may have already relegated him to an AHL career unless he has a rebirth the likes of Gaudette. Madden is the new NCAA gold chip. He has set a precedent with Europeans that if they don't make the NHL, they can go home to develop if they choose to do such. So guys like Tryamkin, Dahlen, and Palmu could be joined by Podkolzin and Hoglander. He cares so little about the farm that he knows they will probably get to play with better players over there because he doesn't put them in Utica in the first place. This season is an anomaly. Baertschi and Goldobin are NHLers in the AHL and the main keys to the Comets success. They are here because he hordes talent until he doesn't need it and they usually walk. Along with Boucher and Bailey they haveformed the heart of the Comets. They better win now because these guys won't be here next season even if the last 2 are exactly the kind of players your young prospects need to watch and play with in order to jump start their development. Boucher and Bailey will have leverage in signing a contract next year with NHL teams that want their farms to be well stocked with experienced guys to aid in the development of their kids and will pay them to do such whether on a 2-way or AHL contract. Besides, Jim can't have a couple guys like that eating up his precious contracts. How else would he have any to give guys like Eliot or Pope?

Most of the names being bantered about above that are Comets now will not become Canucks any more than those who have come before them. Just my opinion based on what I see in the players here and the past history of the Canucks management in dealing with Comets players and those they even decide to make Comets players. I hope I'm wrong. I've said it a million times if I've said it once, we in the Utica fan base wish every player who comes through here makes it into the NHL, but we also know better.

Edit:
Don't say I left out Marky, Demko, or DiPietro. I purposely didn't get into the goal tenders because I was talking about the skaters not the keepers. Much more difficult to walk them right out there before playing any minor league hockey like Boeser, Petey, or Hughes. The goalies have to grow and most take a little or more time and the big club has to have room for them and the roster only has room for 2.
 

4Twenty

Registered User
Dec 18, 2018
9,987
11,831
Fair.....just some difference of opinion here that's fine. It's extremely hard to project even with draft positions. No one would ever dispute Pouliot over Krug back in 2012

Zadorov has mostly been 3rd pair this year...Tryamkin can play 3rd pair next year and no one would blink an eye. Both huge Russians who can skate with limited offensive skill. Hard to project who grows into a bigger role as they mature? And yes he's not signed yet so .....

Anyways your post is well taken. I have very much the same concerns and so do most of the astute fans here that realize we have nothing pushing Myers Edler and Tanev out the door as things are. I also share the opinion that a Carlo type would be exactly what we need not a offensive guy considering Myers and Hughes penchant for jumping in the play. Interesting times ahead for sure. Cap space could dictate a year of using Rafferty Tryamkin and Juolevi Brisebois anyway so it's possible we have a different vision this time of year next season or were pushing for a big trade or signing.

As far as the Avs....yes that's the deepest crop of young dynamic types of any team. That team is now loaded up and should be pushing the chips all in soon. MacKinnon if i had to start a march to the Cup this year would be my 1st pick.
Zadorov is 4th in ice time per game for Colorado defenseman. He’s 2nd on their blue line in total minutes. He’s their #4 and has the same amount of even strength points as Tyler Myers but is more used like a Tanev. That’s lofty expectations to think Tryamkin could easily do that.
 

ChilliBilly

Registered User
Aug 22, 2007
7,379
4,711
chilliwacki
I apologize slightly. I used the word "riches". Clearly not the best word for what I intended, I basically was trying to say that we have a lot of decent tweeners. they could cover the blue line if we were able to trade a decent D man to open up cap space to sign Tryamkin. I have been a major Tryamkin fan and want him back. I have not seen anything definitive on here on whether or not he can sign at the end of his season, and even if he can, can he play this year?

As I said before the season started, we are in cap hell. It limits out ability to sign players, or trade for players who will improve out lineup.
 

sting101

Registered User
Feb 8, 2012
17,116
16,485
I apologize slightly. I used the word "riches". Clearly not the best word for what I intended, I basically was trying to say that we have a lot of decent tweeners. they could cover the blue line if we were able to trade a decent D man to open up cap space to sign Tryamkin. I have been a major Tryamkin fan and want him back. I have not seen anything definitive on here on whether or not he can sign at the end of his season, and even if he can, can he play this year?

As I said before the season started, we are in cap hell. It limits out ability to sign players, or trade for players who will improve out lineup.
cant play this year from what i understand

As a RFA he would have had to sign by Dec 1st....His KHL deal apparently runs through April also which i was unaware of until recently
 

krutovsdonut

eeyore
Sep 25, 2016
17,680
10,415
cant play this year from what i understand

As a RFA he would have had to sign by Dec 1st....His KHL deal apparently runs through April also which i was unaware of until recently

he could be let out of the khl deal early by his club once they are done for the season.

i don't know if there is a hack for the rfa problem though. maybe we could sign a mysterious out of nowhere russian named trikolai nyamkin as a ufa. i mean he's not that distinctive looking.
 

DonnyNucker

Registered User
Mar 28, 2017
4,004
2,904
I apologize slightly. I used the word "riches". Clearly not the best word for what I intended, I basically was trying to say that we have a lot of decent tweeners. they could cover the blue line if we were able to trade a decent D man to open up cap space to sign Tryamkin. I have been a major Tryamkin fan and want him back. I have not seen anything definitive on here on whether or not he can sign at the end of his season, and even if he can, can he play this year?

As I said before the season started, we are in cap hell. It limits out ability to sign players, or trade for players who will improve out lineup.
No reason to apologize. Also, we aren’t in cap hell. Cap hell is trading 1st round picks for salary relief. TO etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca

Melvin

21/12/05
Sep 29, 2017
15,208
28,133
Vancouver, BC
I apologize slightly. I used the word "riches". Clearly not the best word for what I intended, I basically was trying to say that we have a lot of decent tweeners. they could cover the blue line if we were able to trade a decent D man to open up cap space to sign Tryamkin. I have been a major Tryamkin fan and want him back. I have not seen anything definitive on here on whether or not he can sign at the end of his season, and even if he can, can he play this year?

As I said before the season started, we are in cap hell. It limits out ability to sign players, or trade for players who will improve out lineup.
He can sign on July 1.

You can keep posting that you've seen nothing clear and definitive but that doesn't mean nothing clear and definitive has been posted.
 

ChilliBilly

Registered User
Aug 22, 2007
7,379
4,711
chilliwacki
He can sign on July 1.

You can keep posting that you've seen nothing clear and definitive but that doesn't mean nothing clear and definitive has been posted.
A number of people have posted confident comments that state either he can sign or he can't. For every "confident" poster, there is another that states a different opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca

Melvin

21/12/05
Sep 29, 2017
15,208
28,133
Vancouver, BC
A number of people have posted confident comments that state either he can sign or he can't. For every "confident" poster, there is another that states a different opinion.

How many "confident comments" have actually cited the CBA?

upload_2020-1-21_21-47-12.png


I have posted this for you three times now. What comparable evidence have you seen that goes against it?
 

Spectrefire

Registered User
Jan 3, 2013
1,257
1,376
> The number of D-men, whether in the system when he arrived, drafted by him, signed by him as free agents, traded for by him, or any other conceivable means you can think of has produced one player from Utica to become a regular member of the Vancouver Canucks. We are not talking short call-ups, but a full time regular roster member. That one player was Alex Biega, whom many believe is still a better choice than one, if not both, of Benn and Fantenberg.

This is very disingenuous, and I think you know that. The Canucks have had a lot of defensive graduations in Benning's tenure here so far, but the vast majority of them were able to bypass Utica completely and make an immediate jump into the NHL.

Hutton, Stecher, Hughes, and Tyamkin were all prospects that were either in the system or were acquired by Benning who made the immediate jump into the NHL as full-time regulars.
 

4Twenty

Registered User
Dec 18, 2018
9,987
11,831
> The number of D-men, whether in the system when he arrived, drafted by him, signed by him as free agents, traded for by him, or any other conceivable means you can think of has produced one player from Utica to become a regular member of the Vancouver Canucks. We are not talking short call-ups, but a full time regular roster member. That one player was Alex Biega, whom many believe is still a better choice than one, if not both, of Benn and Fantenberg.

This is very disingenuous, and I think you know that. The Canucks have had a lot of defensive graduations in Benning's tenure here so far, but the vast majority of them were able to bypass Utica completely and make an immediate jump into the NHL.

Hutton, Stecher, Hughes, and Tyamkin were all prospects that were either in the system or were acquired by Benning who made the immediate jump into the NHL as full-time regulars.
Disingenuous and hyperbole - two of the most misused and misunderstood words on HFCanucks.

The 4th and 5th sentences of the post you're complaining about:
What about the D-prospects that have been assigned to the farm where the prospects are supposed to develop if they are not instantly NHL ready. That group has numbered 3 in 3 different seasons, Hutton, Stecher, and Hughes.

He forgot Tryamkin.

He literally covered off everything you're complaining about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad