I appreciate your thinly veiled mockery. To answer your first question, yes I have looked at our depth chart at D. I'll give you the opportunity to figure out for yourself why I would suggest it. It is a good exercise in critical thinking. Even if I explain it, you'll just respond how you generally do. Maybe if you actually bothered to think about something before you responded, it would be a benefit to our conversations.
As for your second, I'm bored with these types of posts by you and others. They really aren't even worth responding to. Again, why I suggest it is related to why I mentioned Markov, although Markov would be preferable. Maybe instead of being a jerk and posting dumb crap out Clendening you would ask yourself why Tampa was ok with it. I'm sure you'l come up with some justification that fits your narrative, no matter poorly reasoned.
I tend to offer a different view of things and as time goes on these views tend to circulate more in the main stream and gain traction. In this case they really won't unless Shattenkirk has a great season.
The reason that I'm responding as harshly as I am is that I'm generally tired of the discourse. I have a reputation, justly in some cases. However, people around here think that reputation is justification to treat me poorly and treat me like an idiot (to be fair you treat a lot of people like idiots, no matter how often you are just dead wrong). I've proven over the years that I may be a jerk at times, but I am certainly not an idiot. While my opinions aren't consensus, they are generally well thought out and tend to be "right" far more often than not. I tend to think that you have some valuable insight at times, but I think you could learn nuance and the ability to look at things from multiple angles.
In this case I don't think either of us "right" nor "wrong".
Have a good one.
