I like them in this order for the Kings:
1. Turcotte
2. Byram
3. Cozens
4. Dach/Zegras
Quit putting salt in the wound 17!!!
Turcotte would be a dream but I guess I’d settle for Byram
I like them in this order for the Kings:
1. Turcotte
2. Byram
3. Cozens
4. Dach/Zegras
Not very fond of the first selection for the Kings being Dach, but I’m good with Harley falling to the Kings at 22.
Not very fond of the first selection for the Kings being Dach, but I’m good with Harley falling to the Kings at 22.
I am not going to pay for the site Is there anyway that u would send me the list of all the king picks If i am asking to much no worriesI like these results.
https://www.espn.com/nhl/insider/st...ock-draft-how-all-31-teams-ace-their-picks#la
Zegras, Tomasino, and Johnson.
I am not going to pay for the site Is there anyway that u would send me the list of all the king picks If i am asking to much no worries
It was a mock draft of the first two rounds, and the Kings picks were Zegras, Tomasino, and Johnson.
Who did they have going to CHI and COL?
That's how I have it figured as well. Turcotte is too much like Toews for Chicago to pass up. Byram could fall to the Kings, but Sakic is probably smarter than that.Turcotte to Chicago, Byram to Colorado.
I listened to a podcast with Pronman and one thing he said is that he hates mock drafts because he changes literally changes his mind on the hour and hates to be nailed down. If you notice his draft, he throws out multiple names in the writeup which he did in the podcast too. I think he is a fantastic analyst but his drafts are almost him not wanting to commit because he flip flops all the time.
That said, Dach is a really, really good player who will be at a minimum #2 Center. I think I will just be more disappointed in the we didn't get Byram or Turcotte than being mad about Dach. I like the kid a lot and he will probably play earlier in some because he already has an NHL body.
It's like holding out for Emily Ratajkowski and settling for Olivia Culpo. Nobody will be crying.
If Newhook fell all the way to #17, I would package to trade up and get him. That would be a steal. I think he has Top 10 level talent.
he has turcotte at 10..lowest i have seen himCraig's List: Caufield scores his way into Top 5
https://www.tsn.ca/craig-s-list-caufield-scores-his-way-into-top-5-1.1316942
What stands out to me about Zegras is that he’s the one who is distributing the puck on a line with Jack Hughes.
It’s also evident that he’s a very smart player, and he actually busts his ass to retrieve the puck. He’s not a soft, one dimensional player with questionable work ethic who constantly needs to be motivated to perform, y’know, opposite of most Kings forwards.
he has turcotte at 10..lowest i have seen him
I've gotta be honest, the more I watch the highlights, the less I like Zegras. I wouldn't call him 'soft', and he certainly skates hard...not sure if it's a function of the competition but the guy actively skates away from the slot in the vast majority of those highlights and the only times he cuts through is when he can skate by untouched. You'll also notice--my biggest pet peeve with him--is he'll make a pass then peel/fade away from the play, i.e. no give and gos busting hard to the net, no further support for his teammate, one pass and done. We don't need another half-wall allstar.
The thing that actually impresses me most about Zegras is the same thing that impresses me about EK and that's the 'non highlight' plays, Doughty has the same thing sometimes, just the vision to make a phenomenal headman pass through a maze of players and sticks that no one can see but the player. the 'average' play is a high-level, high skill play that opens up others.
I just have doubts that the highlight plays will transfer to the next level and that big defensemen are going to scare him off like Regehr on Kucherov. I dunno, it's a gut feeling, maybe it's just gas, but he weirds me out.
I'd be happy with any one of Turcotte/Bryram/Zegras/Cozens at 5.
What intrigues me about Zegras is that he seems to have that game sense and anticipation factor that you can't really teach.