monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"
2019/20 Roster Thread XXX - AKA the Ghost Thread | Page 26 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
  • Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

2019/20 Roster Thread XXX - AKA the Ghost Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Giroux has been a very good player, but not number-retired great.

I hate the watering down of retired numbers for “really good” instead of “legendary.”
 
He has had a better peak and prime than ~35-40% of forwards in the Hall of Fame.

No-one in history has EITHER of the:

Hart (3x top 5)
Point (3x top 3)

finishes he has and is not in. Let alone being top 5 across an entire decade in scoring.

If he does not get in then he is almost certainly the best forward in history who is not in.
I think he is going to have to play a lot longer to get in like Recchi. Without a cup, Olympic gold, or an award win, I doubt he will stand out to the writers. There will be guys with worse numbers who will absolutely get in ahead of him because they have a bigger national name and their teams were more successful.
 
He was robbed in 2017-2018. If they weren't giving the Hart to McDavid because his team missed the playoffs, it had to be Giroux over Hall.
 
He has had a better peak and prime than ~35-40% of forwards in the Hall of Fame.

No-one in history has EITHER of the:

Hart (3x top 5)
Point (3x top 3)

finishes he has and is not in. Let alone being top 5 across an entire decade in scoring.

If he does not get in then he is almost certainly the best forward in history who is not in.
Oh definitely do think he should get in, but that's probably partly the fanboy in me talking.
Honestly, I don't really care that much about the HOF anyway, so I'm not really sure how many players are already in who could be considered worse than Giroux.
 
Some informed speculation on deadline prices.

LeBrun: Six specific trade deadline moves that make a lot of...

New York Rangers trade Chris Kreider to the St. Louis Blues in exchange for a 2020 first-round pick and RW Jordan Kyrou. (Rangers retain 50 percent of Kreider’s $4.625 million cap hit.)

My take: Yes, it’s a high price to pay. Teams don’t spend first-round picks at the deadline like they’re candy anymore. But here’s what I do know so far: Eight teams have informed the Rangers they’ve got Kreider at the top of their wish list. And the Rangers are looking for at least the return they got on Kevin Hayes a year ago at the deadline. The Jets gave up a first-round pick and winger Brendan Lemieux for renting out pending UFA Hayes. Now, Hayes is a centre, Kreider is a winger. But Kreider currently is the top of the rental class.
 
I think he is going to have to play a lot longer to get in like Recchi. Without a cup, Olympic gold, or an award win, I doubt he will stand out to the writers. There will be guys with worse numbers who will absolutely get in ahead of him because they have a bigger national name and their teams were more successful.

Do you see any Philadelphia based writer fighting for him to get into the hall of fame?
I don't see the lack of Olympic Gold medal or Cup stopping him how many are in without those. His numbers put him on the HoF likely list.
 
It’s tough to make a case for Giroux having his number retired in comparison to the others the Flyers have honored.

Bobby Clarke: greatest player in franchise history, 2 Cup rings, 3 Hart trophies

Bernie Parent: greatest goalie in franchise history, 2 Cup rings, 2 Vezina trophies, 2 Smythe trophies

Bill Barber: best LW of his generation. 7 times he finished in the top 5 for all star voting at his position, including one 1st team and 2 seconds. 2 Cup rings and was a key player on teams that went to 4 Cup finals

Mark Howe: best all around Dman in the NHL in the mid to late 80s and easily the best in franchise history. 3 time 1st team all star who was robbed of at least 2 Norris trophies.

Eric Lindros: Hart trophy winner, highest points per game average for career in team history and the most dominant player in the NHL from 1994-1999.

Again I love Giroux, but he has not had the career of any of the above.
 
He was robbed in 2017-2018. If they weren't giving the Hart to McDavid because his team missed the playoffs, it had to be Giroux over Hall.

I actually dont have a problem with Hall over Giroux that year. Hall had no supporting cast and literally dragged that team around. G at least had some great players with him in Couturier and Ghost, etc.
 
It’s tough to make a case for Giroux having his number retired in comparison to the others the Flyers have honored.

Bobby Clarke: greatest player in franchise history, 2 Cup rings, 3 Hart trophies

Bernie Parent: greatest goalie in franchise history, 2 Cup rings, 2 Vezina trophies, 2 Smythe trophies

Bill Barber: best LW of his generation. 7 times he finished in the top 5 for all star voting at his position, including one 1st team and 2 seconds. 2 Cup rings and was a key player on teams that went to 4 Cup finals

Mark Howe: best all around Dman in the NHL in the mid to late 80s and easily the best in franchise history. 3 time 1st team all star who was robbed of at least 2 Norris trophies.

Eric Lindros: Hart trophy winner, highest points per game average for career in team history and the most dominant player in the NHL from 1994-1999.

Again I love Giroux, but he has not had the career of any of the above.

You could fairly easily make the same case for Giroux and being snubbed on Harts that you did for Howe.

Im not advocating one way or the other, but the dude has been criminally underrated. Hes no Crosby, but hes about as close as you can get.
 
I actually dont have a problem with Hall over Giroux that year. Hall had no supporting cast and literally dragged that team around. G at least had some great players with him in Couturier and Ghost, etc.

Giroux making the move from center to wing, which allowed Couts to finally slot in at 1C, deserves more recognition than Taylor Hall imo. On top of this, Giroux had an unreal stretch to seal making Playoffs. Hattrick in the final game too to get us in.
 
You could fairly easily make the same case for Giroux and being snubbed on Harts that you did for Howe.

Im not advocating one way or the other, but the dude has been criminally underrated. Hes no Crosby, but hes about as close as you can get.
I hate Crosby, but really? The dude has over 1200 points in less than 1000 games and he’s led his team to 3 Cups. Giroux has been underrated and he’s had some great seasons, but also some that were just good. Also, fwiw, the last 2 times the Flyers made the playoffs, he has 3 points in 12 games and is a -12.

Again, I love the guy and I think he deserves a special night and immediate enshrinement in the Flyers HoF upon retirement. But as of today, I don’t believe he’s earned a spot in the Hockey Hall of Fame or having his number retired.
 
JVR has actually been getting tons of scoring opportunities, & hasn’t been loafing defensively.

He’s frustrating when he’s not converting, I get it. But I may be one of the rare few who’s not unhappy with his roster spot right now.

You aren’t going to replace him with someone better. He’s getting to the right places. I think he’s going to score some big goals.
 
I hate Crosby, but really? The dude has over 1200 points in less than 1000 games and he’s led his team to 3 Cups. Giroux has been underrated and he’s had some great seasons, but also some that were just good. Also, fwiw, the last 2 times the Flyers made the playoffs, he has 3 points in 12 games and is a -12.

Again, I love the guy and I think he deserves a special night and immediate enshrinement in the Flyers HoF upon retirement. But as of today, I don’t believe he’s earned a spot in the Hockey Hall of Fame or having his number retired.
I agree. Flyers Hall of Fame for Giroux? Absolutely. NHL HOF? Not by my standards. Does an HOF player get left off an Olympic team in his prime? But by modern standards he may get in.

Number retired? With corporate ownership they might, to reap $$$ out of the ceremony, but again I think retired numbers are for legends, & G is very good, not legendary.
 
I actually dont have a problem with Hall over Giroux that year. Hall had no supporting cast and literally dragged that team around. G at least had some great players with him in Couturier and Ghost, etc.
Giroux had to drag this team to the playoffs too. 19 points in the final 10 games to just barely get in based on the last one.

He was absolutely insane all year, but especially at the end. Plus the overall difference of 9 points, which is pretty big.
 
I agree. Flyers Hall of Fame for Giroux? Absolutely. NHL HOF? Not by my standards. Does an HOF player get left off an Olympic team in his prime? But by modern standards he may get in.

Number retired? With corporate ownership they might, to reap $$$ out of the ceremony, but again I think retired numbers are for legends, & G is very good, not legendary.
I think Giroux will be considered a Flyers legend, but not an NHL legend.
 
I think Giroux will be considered a Flyers legend, but not an NHL legend.
10-15 years from now when Giroux’s name comes up in a conversation...
Flyers’ fans and knowledgeable hockey fans will recognize his name but he’s does have the legendary notoriety! (Marcel Dionne status...not a snub but you know...)
 
Giroux making the move from center to wing, which allowed Couts to finally slot in at 1C, deserves more recognition than Taylor Hall imo. On top of this, Giroux had an unreal stretch to seal making Playoffs. Hattrick in the final game too to get us in.

Giroux had to drag this team to the playoffs too. 19 points in the final 10 games to just barely get in based on the last one.

He was absolutely insane all year, but especially at the end. Plus the overall difference of 9 points, which is pretty big.

I want to be very clear here - I'm not saying Giroux didnt have a case. I recognize that he had a tremendous year, MVP worth, for certain. Had Giroux won it, I dont think anyone wouldve said that he was undeserving.

At the same time, It's also possible to recognize what Taylor Hall did in NJ that year. I'm not going to go through his points ratios and list the context/nuances behind it because a) it doesnt change anything and b) Im not really trying to convince anyone here. I'm just simply stating that Taylor Hall also had an MVP worth season that year.


I hate Crosby, but really? The dude has over 1200 points in less than 1000 games and he’s led his team to 3 Cups. Giroux has been underrated and he’s had some great seasons, but also some that were just good. Also, fwiw, the last 2 times the Flyers made the playoffs, he has 3 points in 12 games and is a -12.

Again, I love the guy and I think he deserves a special night and immediate enshrinement in the Flyers HoF upon retirement. But as of today, I don’t believe he’s earned a spot in the Hockey Hall of Fame or having his number retired.

Let me clarify here, because I should've used better descriptors, and that's on me - my apologies. When I said he's as close as you can get, what I meant was "He's about as close to a generational player as you can get"without being one" - not that he compares to Crosby. Giroux is easily the top end of the Franchise-level talent pool. If ims tarting a team 10 years ago I obviously take Crosby, but I wouldnt be disappointed with a Giroux, either.

As for the cups - I have a hard time holding that against Giroux. Yes, there are seasons where he could've played better. But at the same time, half of Giroux's prime was spent playing on teams who werent contenders, and were barely playoff teams at best. Meanwhile, the Pens had tanked for 5 years or so before getting the Malkin/Crosby/Fleury picks. that context needs to be considered. I know everyone is obsessed with cup wins, and thats at least partially what the HoF uses to viote for some reason, but I dont view that as a high criteria in terms of an individual player evaluation.

I'm not going to cry if he doesnt get his jersey retired. I think it'll be a shame if hes not eventially voted into the HoF (i dont think hes a first ballot), but he should be there because of his dominance while he played. Appleyard has already lsisted his career accomplishments, so I'm not going to go down that road. He's one of the best players of this decade, and I think that's probably worthy, especially when you look at some of the other people who have gotten in to the HOF.
 
I want to be very clear here - I'm not saying Giroux didnt have a case. I recognize that he had a tremendous year, MVP worth, for certain. Had Giroux won it, I dont think anyone wouldve said that he was undeserving.

At the same time, It's also possible to recognize what Taylor Hall did in NJ that year. I'm not going to go through his points ratios and list the context/nuances behind it because a) it doesnt change anything and b) Im not really trying to convince anyone here. I'm just simply stating that Taylor Hall also had an MVP worth season that year.

I know what you're saying, no worries.

I was just explaining why I think it should've been Giroux over Hall. Obviously all that stuff matters but I think Giroux was still the better choice, not that Hall was a bad one.
 
Hes in my top 5 of all time.

1. Clarke
Propp, Giroux, Lindros are next in no particular order.

I’d say Clarke, Parent, MacLeish, Howe, Lindros, Barber.

Top 6, in that order.

Propp & Giroux are at the top of the second tier.
 
I'm not going to cry if he doesnt get his jersey retired. I think it'll be a shame if hes not eventially voted into the HoF (i dont think hes a first ballot), but he should be there because of his dominance while he played. Appleyard has already lsisted his career accomplishments, so I'm not going to go down that road. He's one of the best players of this decade, and I think that's probably worthy, especially when you look at some of the other people who have gotten in to the HOF.


He's an interesting case... and is one of my favourite players ever. I feel spoiled that I got to watch him play night in and night out for the last 10 years.

That being said - it's called the Hall of Fame - not the Hall of Production or Fancy Stats. So to me, that at least indicates some elements above and beyond production and raw stats that make a player stand out.

I know the HoF seems to have diluted criteria these days - and I honestly don't care either way. It's just not anything important to me as a fan.

So I would think under the current 'criteria', Giroux would get in the HoF. But I would also understand if he didn't, simply because he has 0 awards, 0 cups, and 0 scoring championships. In other words, he hasn't elevated his 'fame' with accomplishments, and he hasn't been a 'benchmark' player that has made a lasting impact on the game (something that I think was in Lindros' favour).

Either way, he will always be one of my favourite players.
 
Oh definitely do think he should get in, but that's probably partly the fanboy in me talking.
Honestly, I don't really care that much about the HOF anyway, so I'm not really sure how many players are already in who could be considered worse than Giroux.

No need to cite the fanboy in you!

He should be a lock already vs who is already in/not.
 
I think he is going to have to play a lot longer to get in like Recchi. Without a cup, Olympic gold, or an award win, I doubt he will stand out to the writers. There will be guys with worse numbers who will absolutely get in ahead of him because they have a bigger national name and their teams were more successful.

He has a clearly better prime than Recchi though... Recchi just played in a crazy high scoring era:

Giroux:

Hart finishes: 3, 4, 4
Point finishes: 2, 3, 3, 10
P/GP: 2, 6, 7

Recchi:

Hart finishes: 6, 9
Point finishes: 3, 4, 5, 10
P/GP: 4, 6, 10
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top
-->->