Pretty straight forward article. I pulled the Kings and Oilers for comparison. When your highest paid players aren't the most bang-for-the-buck players you are going to be near last place. Also threw the Blackhawks and Avalanche in as other comparative data points. Edmonton needs Connor McDavid to pick up his performance and get on this list if they are going to win it all some day. He is overpaid at this time.
By the numbers: The best value contract on every NHL team
Los Angeles Kings
Edmonton Oilers[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PLAYER GSVA/82 XWIN DIFFERENCE CAP HIT (M) YEARS LEFT Matt Roy 2.08 -0.26 2.33 $0.70 1 Ben Hutton 1.09 -0.02 1.11 $1.50 0 Alex Iafallo 1.48 0.45 1.03 $2.43 1 Tyler Toffoli 2.14 1.13 1.02 $4.60 0 Blake Lizotte 0.43 -0.02 0.45 $0.93 1
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Chicago Blackhawks[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PLAYER GSVA/82 XWIN DIFFERENCE CAP HIT (M) YEARS LEFT Kailer Yamamoto 3.92 -0.03 3.95 $0.89 1 Leon Draisaitl 4.18 2.34 1.84 $8.50 5 Ryan Nugent-Hopkins 2.72 1.56 1.16 $6.00 1 Caleb Jones 0.84 -0.25 1.09 $0.72 0 Zack Kassian 1.04 0.3 0.74 $1.95 0
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Colorado Avalanche[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PLAYER GSVA/82 XWIN DIFFERENCE CAP HIT (M) YEARS LEFT Dominik Kubalik 1.66 -0.02 1.68 $0.93 0 Dylan Strome 1.38 -0.04 1.43 $0.86 0 Slater Koekkoek 1.23 -0.19 1.42 $0.93 0 Alex Debrincat 1.28 -0.07 1.35 $0.78 0 Kirby Dach 0.29 -0.02 0.31 $0.93 2
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PLAYER GSVA/82 XWIN DIFFERENCE CAP HIT (M) YEARS LEFT Cale Makar 3.52 -0.2 3.73 $0.88 1 Nathan MacKinnon 4.91 1.66 3.25 $6.30 3 Valeri Nichushkin 2.22 -0.05 2.26 $0.85 0 Ryan Graves 1.86 -0.25 2.1 $0.74 0 Samuel Girard 1.81 -0.25 2.06 $0.73 0
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
The Myth of Mike Richards was part of getting him in the first place. It's why DL couldn't let him go when he got lost in his eyes in the cabin on the crisp Canadian lake.
Kopitar-Richards-Stoll-Richardson
That center depth was fun.
It's a good, fair read.
I will always disagree with the premise because I think 'cost effective' becomes an oxymoron if the player is any good. Most of the names on that list are either RFAs or guys who got a sneaky good contract before exploding (like Mackinnon). They're either going to be awesome and get paid (McDavid) or not-awesome and not get paid. Almost by definition the best players aren't going to be good 'bang-for-the-buck' players.
But that's part of what makes hockey fun, otherwise we'd just default to paper champs.
How many times have we had to say it will be 'easy' to 'replace' Stoll? There are far more talented productive players than him, Greene, Regehr, Mitchell, even Williams, etc.
I agree on one hand that the Richards mythos is a bit bonkers at times but I enjoy believing it because 1. we saw it first hand, 2. it drives the spreadsheet-only people crazy, 3. part of what makes hockey great and players legends is what they do to grind out a win vs. a superior opponent, like watching Richards dance the blueline, partially-absorb/dodge a Getzlaf check (a player with a large size and skill advantage), and pause the game before flinging a pass across to a washed-up scorer another team couldn't wait to get rid of only to watch said scorer battling in front vs. much bigger players and banging in the puck before getting planted on his ass.
But this forum blows my mind sometimes, I can't believe that anyone that watched the 2012-2014 Kings can even remotely have the balls to question the value of intangibles.
But that's part of what makes hockey fun, otherwise we'd just default to paper champs.
How many times have we had to say it will be 'easy' to 'replace' Stoll? There are far more talented productive players than him, Greene, Regehr, Mitchell, even Williams, etc.
I agree on one hand that the Richards mythos is a bit bonkers at times but I enjoy believing it because 1. we saw it first hand, 2. it drives the spreadsheet-only people crazy, 3. part of what makes hockey great and players legends is what they do to grind out a win vs. a superior opponent, like watching Richards dance the blueline, partially-absorb/dodge a Getzlaf check (a player with a large size and skill advantage), and pause the game before flinging a pass across to a washed-up scorer another team couldn't wait to get rid of only to watch said scorer battling in front vs. much bigger players and banging in the puck before getting planted on his ass.
But this forum blows my mind sometimes, I can't believe that anyone that watched the 2012-2014 Kings can even remotely have the balls to question the value of intangibles.
I think Lombardi did a good job of targeting former captains of teams to make the locker room more intense. When you look into the locker room now who is pushing these guys on a Wednesday night game against Phoenix?
Richards was 4th on the Kings in playoff scoring in 2012. Same number of points as Justin Williams and more points than Carter. The only two forwards who produced more points were Brown and Kopitar.
In 2013, Richards was 3rd in playoff scoring on the Kings, only forward to produce more was Jeff Carter. Richards had more playoff points than Williams, Kopitar, Brown, etc.
It wasn’t until 2014 when Richards saw his role severely diminished (and that was justifiable). He still made a number of important plays though, like being responsible for the tying goal against the Ducks in Game 1, and also in OT against the Rangers in Game 1, setting up Williams with the game winner.
There’s no doubt his play and performance fell off a cliff, but Richards was still a valuable piece on the Kings in their three-year run. To deny that is simply being dense.
He really did have some of the strangest fights, especially in the playoffs. Couture, Oshie, Scott Gomez. And then fought Hanzal that one random game Can never accused him of staged scraps that's for sure
It's a good, fair read.
I will always disagree with the premise because I think 'cost effective' becomes an oxymoron if the player is any good. Most of the names on that list are either RFAs or guys who got a sneaky good contract before exploding (like Mackinnon). They're either going to be awesome and get paid (McDavid) or not-awesome and not get paid. Almost by definition the best players aren't going to be good 'bang-for-the-buck' players.
PLAYER | GSVA/82 | XWIN | DIFFERENCE | CAP HIT (M) | YEARS LEFT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zach Hyman | 2.26 | 0.39 | 1.87 | $2.25 | 1 |
Ilya Mikheyev | 1.56 | -0.02 | 1.58 | $0.93 | 0 |
Auston Matthews | 4.59 | 3.32 | 1.27 | $11.63 | 4 |
Justin Holl | 0.9 | -0.26 | 1.16 | $0.68 | 0 |
Travis Dermott | 0.92 | -0.21 | 1.13 | $0.86 | 0 |
Maybe a somewhat surprising big-money outlier, Auston Matthews appears to be worth every penny. His infamously overpaid teammates who are forwards, not so much.
Toronto Maple Leafs
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PLAYER GSVA/82 XWIN DIFFERENCE CAP HIT (M) YEARS LEFT Zach Hyman 2.26 0.39 1.87 $2.25 1 Ilya Mikheyev 1.56 -0.02 1.58 $0.93 0 Auston Matthews 4.59 3.32 1.27 $11.63 4 Justin Holl 0.9 -0.26 1.16 $0.68 0 Travis Dermott 0.92 -0.21 1.13 $0.86 0
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Surprise, anything ot make the Leafs look good.
I wonder how much of that is based on the fact that his big money deal just kicked in this year, or also that it's a 'pace' stat, and dude can't stay healthy.
It's like calling someone a PPG player when they can only stay healthy for 2/3 a season or calling a goalie elite after 40 games (cough brian elliott), how you finish counts.
Nevertheless Matthew's is awesome and gets a raw deal outside of Leafland, he's legit elite and absolutely worth that money...the article even says something to the effect of the top 5 players in the league are amost always paid accurately.
Almost is the key phrase here though. A lot of depth has been sacrificed on the Leafs squad in chasing high-priced forwards. Top five in the NHL right now in no particular order for me are:
McDavid
Matthews
MacKinnon
Hedman
Draisaitl
I would be happy to start a team with any of those players right now. Hedman is on the bubble for me though. He could be replaced on this list if I gave it some more thought. These guys are off the top of my head.
Pretty straight forward article. I pulled the Kings and Oilers for comparison. When your highest paid players aren't the most bang-for-the-buck players you are going to be near last place. Also threw the Blackhawks and Avalanche in as other comparative data points. Edmonton needs Connor McDavid to pick up his performance and get on this list if they are going to win it all some day. He is overpaid at this time.
By the numbers: The best value contract on every NHL team
Los Angeles Kings
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PLAYER GSVA/82 XWIN DIFFERENCE CAP HIT (M) YEARS LEFT Matt Roy 2.08 -0.26 2.33 $0.70 1 Ben Hutton 1.09 -0.02 1.11 $1.50 0 Alex Iafallo 1.48 0.45 1.03 $2.43 1 Tyler Toffoli 2.14 1.13 1.02 $4.60 0 Blake Lizotte 0.43 -0.02 0.45 $0.93 1
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Edmonton Oilers
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PLAYER GSVA/82 XWIN DIFFERENCE CAP HIT (M) YEARS LEFT Kailer Yamamoto 3.92 -0.03 3.95 $0.89 1 Leon Draisaitl 4.18 2.34 1.84 $8.50 5 Ryan Nugent-Hopkins 2.72 1.56 1.16 $6.00 1 Caleb Jones 0.84 -0.25 1.09 $0.72 0 Zack Kassian 1.04 0.3 0.74 $1.95 0
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Chicago Blackhawks
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PLAYER GSVA/82 XWIN DIFFERENCE CAP HIT (M) YEARS LEFT Dominik Kubalik 1.66 -0.02 1.68 $0.93 0 Dylan Strome 1.38 -0.04 1.43 $0.86 0 Slater Koekkoek 1.23 -0.19 1.42 $0.93 0 Alex Debrincat 1.28 -0.07 1.35 $0.78 0 Kirby Dach 0.29 -0.02 0.31 $0.93 2
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Colorado Avalanche
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PLAYER GSVA/82 XWIN DIFFERENCE CAP HIT (M) YEARS LEFT Cale Makar 3.52 -0.2 3.73 $0.88 1 Nathan MacKinnon 4.91 1.66 3.25 $6.30 3 Valeri Nichushkin 2.22 -0.05 2.26 $0.85 0 Ryan Graves 1.86 -0.25 2.1 $0.74 0 Samuel Girard 1.81 -0.25 2.06 $0.73 0
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Here 'ya go:Was there a particular reason you left out the past two cup winners, the St. Louis Blues and Washington Capitals? A couple of their key players are also missing from the top five of best-value contracts.
PLAYER | GSVA/82 | XWIN | DIFFERENCE | CAP HIT (M) | YEARS LEFT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alex Pietrangelo | 3.33 | 1.44 | 1.89 | $6.50 | 0 |
Robert Thomas | 1.77 | -0.03 | 1.81 | $0.89 | 1 |
Vince Dunn | 1.43 | -0.25 | 1.68 | $0.72 | 0 |
Zach Sanford | 1.56 | 0.16 | 1.4 | $1.50 | 1 |
Jaden Schwartz | 2.67 | 1.36 | 1.31 | $5.35 | 1 |
PLAYER | GSVA/82 | XWIN | DIFFERENCE | CAP HIT (M) | YEARS LEFT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jakub Vrana | 1.9 | 0.73 | 1.17 | $3.35 | 1 |
John Carlson | 2.77 | 1.88 | 0.89 | $8.00 | 6 |
Jonas Siegenthaler | 0.59 | -0.25 | 0.84 | $0.71 | 0 |
Nic Dowd | 0.47 | -0.08 | 0.55 | $0.75 | 2 |
Lars Eller | 1.22 | 0.78 | 0.44 | $3.50 | 3 |
Here 'ya go:
Two of St. Louis' highest paid players are in the mix.
St. Louis Blues
Washington has one of its highest paid players on the list.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PLAYER GSVA/82 XWIN DIFFERENCE CAP HIT (M) YEARS LEFT Alex Pietrangelo 3.33 1.44 1.89 $6.50 0 Robert Thomas 1.77 -0.03 1.81 $0.89 1 Vince Dunn 1.43 -0.25 1.68 $0.72 0 Zach Sanford 1.56 0.16 1.4 $1.50 1 Jaden Schwartz 2.67 1.36 1.31 $5.35 1
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Washington Capitals
It appears, a team needs at least one, preferably two of their top paid guys on this list. Having none is a recipe for close to DFL finishes.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PLAYER GSVA/82 XWIN DIFFERENCE CAP HIT (M) YEARS LEFT Jakub Vrana 1.9 0.73 1.17 $3.35 1 John Carlson 2.77 1.88 0.89 $8.00 6 Jonas Siegenthaler 0.59 -0.25 0.84 $0.71 0 Nic Dowd 0.47 -0.08 0.55 $0.75 2 Lars Eller 1.22 0.78 0.44 $3.50 3
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
For all issues they mentioned and those they didn't, they need to cancel this year. And the idea of playing this season into fall, then starting a new season in Jan, that they want 82 games next year, also ridiculous.
So this game took place six f***ing years ago, and instead of getting a replay of it today, FSW is televising bowling, drag racing, and an Angels game from 2002. Who the hell is in charge of their programming?
Yeah they just need to give up on this year already. As much as it sucks, it at least means hopefully getting back to normal next year instead of turning that into a shit show too.For all issues they mentioned and those they didn't, they need to cancel this year. And the idea of playing this season into fall, then starting a new season in Jan, that they want 82 games next year, also ridiculous.