deaderhead28
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2010
- 5,428
- 4,002
NorCal is always LA's enemy. You couldn't pay me to be on the same side as those ****heads.
NorCal is always LA's enemy. You couldn't pay me to be on the same side as those ****heads.
Lol ok that was funnyYou need a hug.
Your mom took care of that,thanks for looking out tho.You need puberty.
Case and point.Your mom took care of that,thanks for looking out tho.
You're hilarious.Have a goodnight and support your Sharks.Case and point.
Dude. Not rooting for them to win it all, just want them to beat Vegas.
They’re three years older and less of a threat. Vegas on the other hand went to the finals last year and added an entire second line.The earlier they're out, the better. Please don't tell me that their 2016 run didn't give you a scare.
Really depressing to see how Boston was able to reload around their Cup team and the Kings immediately fell off a ****ing cliff.
And the Kings young guys flopped (Toffoli and Pearson). Those two guys should've been 50 combined goals on the Kings 2nd line the last few years.Since their Cup in 2011, this is their playoff results:
Lost:
1st
Finals
2nd
missed
missed
1st
2nd
tbd
They also drafted well including having 5 firsts in 2 years, [thanks to our stupid GM's poor decisions trading ours] . One thing they didn't do was throw picks around like business cards at a convention trying to win. They got a second wave of guys coming up, we did not. Still, not making past the second round isn't something I'd be bragging about.
Should be a good series. Cbj appears to be the better team.Bruins / Blue Jackets is going to be a good series. If Jackets can keep up their intensity from round 1, im not sure anyone is going to beat them.
They’re three years older and less of a threat. Vegas on the other hand went to the finals last year and added an entire second line.
It seems you haven’t met any Vegas fans.The point is Vegas fans don't bother me one bit. Bay Area fans on the other hand, my hate for them is in my blood.
Trading for Lucic was not taking a risk. Holding on to Mike Richards was not a risk. Re-signing Gaborik to a seeetheart retirement deal was not taking a risk. Signing a 35 year old Kovalchuk to a retirement contract was not a risk. This was poor management through and through. It’s amazing how incapable you are of just admitting the Kings have been poorly managed since 2014.
The Bruins won a championship, retooled correctly, and went right back to contention. The Kings won two championships, did not retool correctly, and just had their worst record in a decade.
Why is any of this controversial to you? You’re really criticizing me for wishing the Lombardi regime had properly retooled after 2014?