Hughes is only 2 points behind Newhook for the team lead. He's also second in points per game (min. 10 games) in the playoffs, of course behind Newhook.
Ok. Who does this remind you of:
- Drafted in one of the later rounds
- Playing for one of the top teams in the country
- Being sent back to juniors and barely playing at the highest level
- In 2018, Traded to a different team
- Playing top-pair minutes on that new team
- Reaching the play offs with that new team
- Being labeled as one of the best young D-men in the country
Because that's both Rykov and Reunanen
Rykov didn't slip as low as Reunanen b/c he didn't have big injuries two seasons in a row.I think @eco's bones 's point was that Rykov had never slipped as low as Reunanen in post draft development so his recovery this season is "optically" more impressive. Personally I've been impressed with their progress this season pretty equally (except for my Russian bias, of course)![]()
I think @eco's bones 's point was that Rykov had never slipped as low as Reunanen in post draft development so his recovery this season is "optically" more impressive. Personally I've been impressed with their progress this season pretty equally (except for my Russian bias, of course)![]()
Reunanen dropped in the draft because of the injury in his draft season, but I don't recall him having anything serious thereafter. He was just squeezed out of the lineup by other players.Rykov didn't slip as low as Reunanen b/c he didn't have big injuries two seasons in a row.
Sorry, I include recovery-time as part of "injury"Reunanen dropped in the draft because of the injury in his draft season, but I don't recall him having anything serious thereafter. He was just squeezed out of the lineup by other players.
Ok. Who does this remind you of:
- Drafted in one of the later rounds
- Playing for one of the top teams in the country
- Being sent back to juniors and barely playing at the highest level
- In 2018, Traded to a different team
- Playing top-pair minutes on that new team
- Reaching the play offs with that new team
- Being labeled as one of the best young D-men in the country
Because that's both Rykov and Reunanen
Except the Russian league is much better than the Finnish league. The Liiga is viewed somewhere between the AHL and the ECHL, while the KHL's top squads would be competitive with NHL's non-playoff teams in a 7-game series. Track how successful top players from the KHL vs top players from Liiga do upon moving to North America.
Once they move over, you can preach your wisdom on how every prospect struggles and how nobody will ever achieve anything in the NHL. That's your area of expertise, after all
Except the Russian league is much better than the Finnish league. The Liiga is viewed somewhere between the AHL and the ECHL, while the KHL's top squads would be competitive with NHL's non-playoff teams in a 7-game series. Track how successful top players from the KHL vs top players from Liiga do upon moving to North America.
And Mestis is basically a beer league, so since Reunanen didn't produce there we should write him off as a prospect.
..Right?
Tarmo is a year younger while also missing out on a season due to injury, he has time to develop further In Europe. Rykov will be turning 22 next month, great age to cross the pond this summer.
Good point, have to sign Tarmo then with most likely scenario to loan him back. Rykov is at a great age to come over, he's physically there and has a mature game on top of it. It's a good problem to have really.Rykov's rights do not expire though. Gives the Rangers more time
Good point, have to sign Tarmo then with most likely scenario to loan him back. Rykov is at a great age to come over, he's physically there and has a mature game on top of it. It's a good problem to have really.
Are Tarmo's rights expiring this summer? If so you sign him but he should stay in Europe. A couple more guys you mentioned above likely won't be here, be it not brought back or summer trades. After that competition is good, I won't complain if Hartford has 8 decent D.Assuming O'Gara leaves, we still have 15 D-men in the system.
Skjei, Shattenkirk, Smith, Staal, Pionk, DeAngelo, Claesson in NY
Hajek, Lindgren, Day, Raddysh, Crawley, Keane, Bigras, Gilmour in CT
Where does Tarmo or Yegor fit in? And I still think Hartford needs 1 or 2 veteran D-men. You can't have a blue-line with an avg age of 22 and expect to win
Are Tarmo's rights expiring this summer? If so you sign him but he should stay in Europe. A couple more guys you mentioned above likely won't be here, be it not brought back or summer trades. After that competition is good, I won't complain if Hartford has 8 decent D.
Assuming O'Gara leaves, we still have 15 D-men in the system.
Skjei, Shattenkirk, Smith, Staal, Pionk, DeAngelo, Claesson in NY
Hajek, Lindgren, Day, Raddysh, Crawley, Keane, Bigras, Gilmour in CT
Where does Tarmo or Yegor fit in? And I still think Hartford needs 1 or 2 veteran D-men. You can't have a blue-line with an avg age of 22 and expect to win
HS is actually beer league level, and Vinni went from a meh HS player to scoring in the NHL yesterday, so anything can happen. That said, you'll probably go bankrupt betting on very random HS players to make the NHL.
There's a difference between writing someone off and not relying on him. It's not black or white, it's very different shades of grey.
If you watch the Liiga and tell me that a player there looks like an NHLer, great, I'll take your word for it. But if you judge a player purely based on stats, he better have stats of past guys at the same age who did what you expect him to do. For ex, if a player scored 30 points and 9 of 10 past 30 point scorers in the Liiga failed to make it, and you dont watch the games, just judge on stats, and your expectation is that he makes it, what is that except wishful thinking?
Either way, Rykov is playing well in the KHL and several people saw him play and do well, so high expectations are reasonable. Tarmo is playing at a lower level and unless i missed something, nobody watched him any significant amount of time. High expectations aren't reasonable. But yeah, anything can happen.
Assuming O'Gara leaves, we still have 15 D-men in the system.
Skjei, Shattenkirk, Smith, Staal, Pionk, DeAngelo, Claesson in NY
Hajek, Lindgren, Day, Raddysh, Crawley, Keane, Bigras, Gilmour in CT
Where does Tarmo or Yegor fit in? And I still think Hartford needs 1 or 2 veteran D-men. You can't have a blue-line with an avg age of 22 and expect to win
Bigras is 24 with I think 4 years of AHL experience. Gilmour will be 26 in May.
I think some moves will be made in the offseason and some combo of Pionk, Smith or Shattenkirk will be moved. Keane could start in the ECHL.
I dont think the current picture of the professional dcore will be the same in a few months or prevent them from signing those 2.
Gilmour's a UFA--there's a pretty decent chance he's not going to be back. Claesson signed as a UFA but he's an RFA now but I'm not sure he'll be back either.
I also think the Rangers are going to do something about their right side. Shattenkirk, Pionk and DeAngelo are too similar in being smallish, puck moving defensemen with defensive issues. To me it's a problem--not that that's important but I think it might be a problem to the Rangers too. Personally if we could find another team for Shattenkirk who seems to have slowed I would be all for it.
What too 10 prospects can we see coming next season, the guys who will be there in preseason or make the roster that we havent seen yet?
Never doubted Tarmo, my guy.
Assuming O'Gara leaves, we still have 15 D-men in the system.
Skjei, Shattenkirk, Smith, Staal, Pionk, DeAngelo, Claesson in NY
Hajek, Lindgren, Day, Raddysh, Crawley, Keane, Bigras, Gilmour in CT
Where does Tarmo or Yegor fit in? And I still think Hartford needs 1 or 2 veteran D-men. You can't have a blue-line with an avg age of 22 and expect to win