Prospect Info: 2018-2019 Rangers Prospects Thread (Stats in Post #1; Updated 4.25.19)

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Hockey News Futures Watch issue is out online. The Rangers article was written by Steve Zipay.

The HN ranks organizations by players 21 and under, not just players who have yet to play a certain number of NHL games. So, for example, Vancouver's rating is higher because of Elias Pettersson. The Ranger ranking also includes Filip Chytil and Brett Howden. With this background the Rangers had a B+ rating, 11 th in the NHL. That's up from 24 last year.

The Rangers had four players in the top 100:

5. Vitaly Kravtsov
34. Lias Andersson
37. Igor Shestryorkin
62. K'Andre Miller

These four are the first four players in the Rangers top ten. The others are:

5. Libor Hajek
6. Nils Lundkvist
7. Adam Huska
8. Ryan Lindgren
9. Morgan Barron
10. Joey Keane

Last year's top ten were:

1. Andersson
2. Chytil
3. Shestorkin
4. Hajek
5. Deangelo
6. Howden
7. Lindgren
8. Pionk
9. Huska
10. Rykov

There obviously is room to debate the rankings but I doubt Zipay made this list up. He is talking to Rangers front office so I think this provides some indication of where the Rangers rank the players. Also remember that while this issue just came out the work on it would have been done a few weeks if not months ago and so would not account for a player who had a strong end of the year such as Reunanen.
Where can I find this? I’ve looked around and couldn’t find anything about it
 
The Hockey News Futures Watch issue is out online. The Rangers article was written by Steve Zipay.

The HN ranks organizations by players 21 and under, not just players who have yet to play a certain number of NHL games. So, for example, Vancouver's rating is higher because of Elias Pettersson. The Ranger ranking also includes Filip Chytil and Brett Howden. With this background the Rangers had a B+ rating, 11 th in the NHL. That's up from 24 last year.

The Rangers had four players in the top 100:

5. Vitaly Kravtsov
34. Lias Andersson
37. Igor Shestryorkin
62. K'Andre Miller

These four are the first four players in the Rangers top ten. The others are:

5. Libor Hajek
6. Nils Lundkvist
7. Adam Huska
8. Ryan Lindgren
9. Morgan Barron
10. Joey Keane

Last year's top ten were:

1. Andersson
2. Chytil
3. Shestorkin
4. Hajek
5. Deangelo
6. Howden
7. Lindgren
8. Pionk
9. Huska
10. Rykov

There obviously is room to debate the rankings but I doubt Zipay made this list up. He is talking to Rangers front office so I think this provides some indication of where the Rangers rank the players. Also remember that while this issue just came out the work on it would have been done a few weeks if not months ago and so would not account for a player who had a strong end of the year such as Reunanen.

One obvious omission is Rykov who was a top10 last year and should have made the 100 list. Reunanen is the other.
 
THN is usually hillariously bad. I'll take our polls here over THN every day of the week, twice the day Future Watch comes out.


The Hockey News Futures Watch issue is out online. The Rangers article was written by Steve Zipay.

The HN ranks organizations by players 21 and under, not just players who have yet to play a certain number of NHL games. So, for example, Vancouver's rating is higher because of Elias Pettersson. The Ranger ranking also includes Filip Chytil and Brett Howden. With this background the Rangers had a B+ rating, 11 th in the NHL. That's up from 24 last year.

The Rangers had four players in the top 100:

5. Vitaly Kravtsov
34. Lias Andersson
37. Igor Shestryorkin
62. K'Andre Miller

These four are the first four players in the Rangers top ten. The others are:

5. Libor Hajek
6. Nils Lundkvist
7. Adam Huska
8. Ryan Lindgren
9. Morgan Barron
10. Joey Keane

Last year's top ten were:

1. Andersson
2. Chytil
3. Shestorkin
4. Hajek
5. Deangelo
6. Howden
7. Lindgren
8. Pionk
9. Huska
10. Rykov

There obviously is room to debate the rankings but I doubt Zipay made this list up. He is talking to Rangers front office so I think this provides some indication of where the Rangers rank the players. Also remember that while this issue just came out the work on it would have been done a few weeks if not months ago and so would not account for a player who had a strong end of the year such as Reunanen.
 
My fear is that all of a sudden Russia refuses to let their players come over to the NHL.

There's no "refusing" or "letting them come over" at all. Ever. The KHL and NHL do not have a transfer agreement so the players are bound by contracts. It is up to the players, not the leagues. If the player wants to move to the other league once he is a free agent, he can. Nothing can stop them. The KHL cannot force players to stay if they aren't under contract
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband
Barron is playing now on ESPN+ in the ECAC championship game. Had a decent game last night with the goal. Wasn't needed much and didn't play a ton the last half since they were up by so much (Normal line rolling instead double shifting the top guys).

Had an early chance and looks pretty engaged so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeorgeKaplan
One obvious omission is Rykov who was a top10 last year and should have made the 100 list. Reunanen is the other.

Rykov should be easily on the list. I'd like to see Reunanen perform in a better league than Liiga before proclaiming him as anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband
There's no "refusing" or "letting them come over" at all. Ever. The KHL and NHL do not have a transfer agreement so the players are bound by contracts. It is up to the players, not the leagues. If the player wants to move to the other league once he is a free agent, he can. Nothing can stop them. The KHL cannot force players to stay if they aren't under contract
Tell that to Leonid Brezhnev. Though he's been dead for almost forty years so I might be worrying over nothing. But Yuri Andropov has only been dead for about 35, so who's paranoid now?.
 
thing i find interesting about that top 100 group is how much higher others view lias compared to many here...and on the flip side, not that 62 is bad, but they clearly don't think as highly of miller as most here
 
Ragnarsson is good, he was played in a defensive role on a severely underperforming team but he played fairly big minutes in a pro league and he was definitely fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheKingsCourt
Reunanen's injury issues set him back a couple years. IMO--he's had a fantastic year this year. Has become his team's most important d-man on a quality team in a quality league. Doing really well in the playoffs too. Rangers should be thinking about bringing him over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband
Ragnarsson is good, he was played in a defensive role on a severely underperforming team but he played fairly big minutes in a pro league and he was definitely fine.

His numbers don't look that great but he also almost made the Swedish WJC team......so there's a bit more to look at than just raw numbers. Joey Keane's numbers kind of dropped when he was moved to London but he almost made the USA WJC team and London has Bouchard and Boqvist on D to take the most quality ice time. Rangers signed Keane but he and Ragnarsson are running a little under the radar because of the situations they're in. For 3rd rounders they are both intriguing players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nyr2k2
Själin is still out following a concussion, but his team Leksands beat AIK 7-2 in game 2, eliminating AIK in 2 games to advances to the promotion/relegation play offs where they take on Mora (Best of 7)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joey Bones
There's no "refusing" or "letting them come over" at all. Ever. The KHL and NHL do not have a transfer agreement so the players are bound by contracts. It is up to the players, not the leagues. If the player wants to move to the other league once he is a free agent, he can. Nothing can stop them. The KHL cannot force players to stay if they aren't under contract
Ever? Ask Slava Fetisov about that....
 
Oshawa destroyed an overwhelmed Peterborough team 8-2. Cumulative score through the first two is 15-2.

Gross had no points, was even, one shot, and 2 PIM. His offense basically stopped completely in the second half of the season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad