FlyTimmo
pit <3
- Jul 10, 2013
- 12,456
- 10,525
I said I've soured a bit. I'm not making the case he is bad.
This team flounders 5on5. It's a chore to watch. I've watched good 5on5 teams. This team isn't one of those teams yet. Probably due to coaching. If they managed to get production anyway, it's in spite of how lukewarm they are 5on5. Numerical production isn't the same thing as quality. By that rationale, a pigeon player who isn't a well-rounded NHLer who scores more goals would somehow be better than a guy who scores slightly less goals, but plays all 200 feet. Last year, this team wasn't a complete player @ 5on5.
Passable isn't a glowing endorsement. I expected Weal to be better. Given the style of player he is, he has to make up for it in other ways, which he only "kind of" does. Ergo, soured.
You're strawmanning me a bit. My complaint isn't about how much money he makes. I'm remarking on how you are putting him just ahead of other players, one of whom is a literal cap dump transaction player. Again, not a ringing endorsement. I wouldn't want you as my lawyer.
He can battle all he wants-- he's not talented enough to do it well all the time with his size, which vacillates somewhere between being okay to being a problem, which is, I suppose, not the worst thing in the world if he doesn't get a lot of minutes. So, I'm meh here.
That being said, I hope I can return to my former opinion of thinking he could be a minor "something" for the team.
Huh..? The team is decent at 5v5 whether you want to believe it or not. Numerical production accounts for both GF and GA. It is okay if you believe otherwise, but I can't force you to be correct.