2018-19 Roster talk; Part two

[deadhead]

Not sure the Sharks would do it one for one, but they might consider it.
It would make sense for us, I think Laughton is best suited to wing and a true PK center would allow Ron to focus on 3C.

 

[deadhead]

Didn't you argue that scrubs on the Flyer's roster are Hextall's fault, not the coaches? So OTHER teams' coaches get input on who to sign and put on the roster, but Hack doesn't. How convenient. And Chicago has proven they love signing terrible contracts the last 3 or 4 years, so using them as a gauge is laughable.

Lavi has a lot more pull than Hakstol.
I'm sure Ron talks to Hakstol, but does anyone believe he'd let Hakstol overrule a decision?

 

[Curufinwe]

If they want to shed cap, they can add a pick, not us

Tierney is already a 40 point forward and a top penalty killer, though. He has more value than Laughton.

 

[Tripod]

The Sharks apparently want to shed some cap, and we know Hextall wants to add a PK forward. So how about a trade of Laughton ($962,500 cap hit) + pick for Tierney (2,937,500 cap hit)? He was San Jose's leading PK forward.

NHL.com - Stats

Personally, I want to keep Laughton as he is one of the few who can play C if an injury occurs.

 

[Rebels57]

Personally, I want to keep Laughton as he is one of the few who can play C if an injury occurs.

Is Tierney not a C?

 

[Tripod]

Is Tierney not a C?

Yes but I don't want Lehtera to be an option.

 

[Rebels57]

Yes but I don't want Lehtera to be an option.

Swapping Laughton for Tierney doesnt change how many C's we would have though.

 

[Striiker]

Swapping Laughton for Tierney doesnt change how many C's we would have though.

I think he meant he’d rather trade someone else for Tierney so we’d be adding a C instead of merely swapping one for one.

Could be wrong though...

 

[deadhead]

Unfortunately, we don't have any talented low cost players on the roster we could trade.
Which means either a fairly high draft picks (at least a 2nd and probably more) or a solid prospect.

 

[Stizzle]

Was this camp invite previously known? Egor Zamula.

 

[Tripod]

I think he meant he’d rather trade someone else for Tierney so we’d be adding a C instead of merely swapping one for one.

Could be wrong though...

No you would be correct.

 

[BernieParent]

Unfortunately, we don't have any talented low cost players on the roster we could trade.
Which means either a fairly high draft picks (at least a 2nd and probably more) or a solid prospect.

Depending on your definitions of talented and low-cost, Weal could fit these criteria, as could Raffl. And if Tierney can be a skilled PK 1C while putting up comparable numbers, I would make someone like Aube-Kubel available for him.

 

[Rebels57]

Was this camp invite previously known? Egor Zamula.

I dont think it has been discussed here.

 

[dats81]

Anybody seen Zamula play?
Is he the supposed to be the next Max Lamarche or could he be a Phil Myers like success story?

 

[ZEBROA]

Will Lindflower earn a spot?

 

[deadhead]

If this is the guy,
Yegor Zamula at eliteprospects.com

He needs some cheesesteaks.
But worth a look, if he shows something, sign him and wait for him to fill out.

 

[BackToTheBrierePatch]

Igor Zamula. I hope he makes it on the name alone

 

[FlyTimmo]

I remember seeing play once this year during a Red Deer vs. Hitmen game.

I wasn't focused on him, so I can't say too much. He was a little awkward, both in his skating and puckhandling, but he was solid overall. He made smart passes and was pretty consistent defensively. You can definitely see the potential if he can put on some weight and smooth out his fundamentals. We'll see if Hextall gives him a contract.

 

[Stizzle]

Bonus points to whoever has really good eyes and can tell who all is in this picture.

 

[Magua]

Bonus points to whoever has really good eyes and can tell who all is in this picture.

(L-R) Lindblom, Gudas, Leier, Weise, Patrick, Weal, Myers, Hagg, Giroux

 

[Striiker]

No Sanheim eh?

Lazy little entitled brat

 

[Lord Defect]

Igor Zamula. I hope he makes it on the name alone

His number should be $$

 

[bauer]

No Sanheim eh?

Lazy little entitled brat

we don't see Sanheim cause he was in Hak's office getting yelled at.

 

[deadhead]

Depending on your definitions of talented and low-cost, Weal could fit these criteria, as could Raffl. And if Tierney can be a skilled PK 1C while putting up comparable numbers, I would make someone like Aube-Kubel available for him.

If they're trading him as a cost cutting move, Raffl is not an option for them. His salary is similar to Tierney.

Weal is not nearly as valuable as Tierney, he'd be a throw-in at best until he has a 30+ ES point season.

Tierney has been a 20-30 point ES scorer, which makes him a marginal 3rd line guy but a top 4th line guy.
Played 16 minutes a night at age 23. Had 2 SH goals and 2 SH assists, he adds value to the PK.
So he wouldn't come cheap. He's not a top 6 guy, but he's a solid depth piece.

 

[deadhead]

I want to see what Hatcher was able to do with that p***y Sanheim over the summer.