sincerity0
Registered User
- Dec 23, 2016
- 1,970
- 740
Yep. It's going to be a lot of scout preference in that tier.
TBH in most scenarios this is a perfect draft / spot to trade back
Yep. It's going to be a lot of scout preference in that tier.
#8 and #37 for #5
Assume 1 - 4 is Nico, Patrick, Villardi, Heiskanen
Would Vancouver move down 4 spots?
Maybe they have Glass, Middlestadt, Tippett, Necas all rated equally.
We get Makar. They still have a choice of 2 of those 4.
This is still about drafting.
Maybe we toss in a near NHL ready forward prospect?
TBH in most scenarios this is a perfect draft / spot to trade back
#8 and #37 for #5
Assume 1 - 4 is Nico, Patrick, Villardi, Heiskanen
Would Vancouver move down 4 spots?
Maybe they have Glass, Middlestadt, Tippett, Necas all rated equally.
We get Makar. They still have a choice of 2 of those 4.
This is still about drafting.
Maybe we toss in a near NHL ready forward prospect?
The almost constant wave of Tanev talk leads me to believe that Vancouver would just take Makar. They've got a future 2c, they really don't need to take another one with Makar still available.
Valimaki is not a reach at 8. Listen to literally any draft analyst, and they'll tell you that after the top 2, there is very little separation between about 20 guys.
Mittlestadt...just do whatever to get him.
Some have him going as top3, you still support that statement?
What reputable drafting sources has him going top 3?
Mittlestadt...just do whatever to get him.
This could likely be our last chance to get a high end forward in some time as well.
Don't worry. As long as we ignore the defense, we'll have ever more shots at the high end forward.
This could likely be our last chance to get a high end forward in some time as well.
I highly doubt a prospect like Middlestadt plays 4 years of college hockey. NCAA players with his level of talent never stay that long. Nobody forgoes 2-3 years of NHL paychecks for that. The guys who stay until they're UFAs are almost 100% guys who wouldn't/couldn't have gotten NHL contracts sooner.
“My wife, Dede, and I said, ‘We think you should go,’ †said Tom Mittelstadt, who spoke for Eden Prairie hockey fans and the sport’s stay-in-high school advocates when he added, “‘But we’re glad you’re home.’â€
“He had enough backbone to say, ‘I’m going to be a high school player this year,’ †said former Gopher Scott Bell, a Pittsburgh scout. “He’s not a sheep; he’s a lion and that’s a real positive.â€
This could likely be our last chance to get a high end forward in some time as well.
Yeah agreed. But still, I don't want to go the NCAA route for our potentially "last" high end draft pick prospect. I want them going pro by age 20, not spending their sophomore season in college. I'd pass over a Mittelstadt for Glass.
8OA + 2nd rnd to move up somewhere in the 5-7 range to get Makar?
Only saying this because I don't think Makar will be around by 8. I'd say high chance Patrick/Hischier, Valardi, and Heskainen are the top 4, leaving Glass, Middlestadt, Makar, Tippet/Liljegren as the most likely left over players.
Also I've seen some pretty negative things about Liljegrens game, including scouts saying his hockey IQ is very poor, and he is constantly shooting the puck, even when the lane is blocked & there's someone else wide open for a sure goal. His skating is tops in this draft, but I'm not high on him.
Anyone know Botteril's preferences with picking prospects?
Also if by some miracle Heskainen and Makar are both on the board at 8, who do you take?
I want Makar so bad, more than I wanted either Bennett or Reinhart - kid has freakish talent and the fact he's doing it against Tier 2 competition doesn't worry me. Watch him, he's special and he will be special in the NCAA and in the NHL.
Most lists have him 8-10th, so he may available to us without us doing anything but anything can happen so I'd like to trade up to 5th.
Take a look at this from a few days ago, 2G 1A in a playoff game.