Melvin
21/12/05
Code:Season Age Lg GP G A PTS +/- 2002-03 20 NHL 28 5 3 8 -4 2003-04 21 NHL 31 9 6 15 1 2005-06 23 NHL 80 26 29 55 -14 2006-07 24 NHL 81 34 46 80 5 2007-08 25 NHL 63 19 28 47 -16 2008-09 26 NHL 81 39 43 82 -2 2009-10 27 NHL 65 26 24 50 7 2010-11 28 NHL 67 19 28 47 2 Career NHL 856 290 330 620 -50
If you'd given MYSTERY PLAYER B the Atkinson contract, right now you'd still be on the hook for a huge cap hit to the end of this season and he'd have given you this production:
Code:Season Age Lg GP G A PTS +/- 2011-12 29 NHL 66 20 21 41 -10 2012-13 30 NHL 44 13 19 32 -15 2013-14 31 NHL 63 26 19 45 -13 2014-15 32 NHL 68 27 15 42 2 2015-16 33 NHL 42 14 24 38 15 2016-17 34 NHL 61 10 21 31 -9 2017-18 35 NHL 16 3 4 7 1 Career NHL 856 290 330 620 -50
Let's see...
Cap is at 75M right now and contract kicks in for next season, let's say 5.8M will be roughly 7.5% of next year's cap.
In 2011-12 the cap was at 64.3M, so a similar cap hit would have been 4.8M.
The player in question was actually making 6M at the time and signed for 25/5 after the 2013-14 season. So locking in those seven years at 4.8M actually would have been prudent for the team in this hypothetical. Additionally, the buyout would have been less as this year @ 4.8M would have represented the final year of the deal instead of it being 2 more seasons @ 5M.
Going back to Atkinson, if he produces through age 33 the way this player did, then 5.8M will be a relative bargain, and paying for 2 more seasons is just the cost of doing business.