Not when you want a checking line winger.
Ya I have no issues with him being on the team itself if he is named, he's one of the bubble guys who has a deserving case. I just don't see him as someone who should be on the 2nd line of probably the best team in the world.
86Habs, you're right those guys did lead Canada's ice time as forwards except for maybe Crosby. I don't think I'd have as much of an issue if it was something like Toews, Carter, and Benn. It just seems like a really weak 2nd line to have both Carter and Marchand on it. But I guess you never really know how these things will turn out until you put these guys on the ice together and see how things work out.
Why on earth would you pick a checking winger for Team Canada?
It will be like 2006 all over again.
You pick the most dominant team possible and let the other team try and stop you. Don't worry about stopping them.
I will also leave this here: http://stats.hockeyanalysis.com/rat...rds&minutes=1000&disp=1&sort=PCT&sortdir=DESC
No need to get caught up in first, second, third or fourth line. Canada rolls lines.
Because Canada has a checking line, and thus there will be two checking line wingers. Same role filled by Richards/Nash in 2010 and Marleau/Carter in 2014. Unless Canada suddenly brings along an incredibly immobile defence to international size ice, I'm not seeing any parallels with the problems of 2006.
Our checking lines will be all four lines that have the puck constantly in the other teams end.
Canada is a Bugatti and we shouldn't be trying to put a governor on it!
In these tournaments penalties aren't called as much and it would make sense to have the best even strength scorers available, no?
Ya I have no issues with him being on the team itself if he is named, he's one of the bubble guys who has a deserving case. I just don't see him as someone who should be on the 2nd line of probably the best team in the world.
86Habs, you're right those guys did lead Canada's ice time as forwards except for maybe Crosby. I don't think I'd have as much of an issue if it was something like Toews, Carter, and Benn. It just seems like a really weak 2nd line to have both Carter and Marchand on it. But I guess you never really know how these things will turn out until you put these guys on the ice together and see how things work out.
Isn't it kind of weird that Logan Couture could make a strong case for Conn Smythe this year, and still receive 0 consideration from anybody for this team?
There will be a checking line, even though all four lines will be expected to be responsible defensively. There is always a defensive line for Canada, and it makes sense to pick players suited to such a role. Marchand is someone who fits that role quite well.
Funny that you mention taking the best even strength scorers, since this year Marchand was fourth in the NHL and best among Canadians in this regard.
Isn't it kind of weird that Logan Couture could make a strong case for Conn Smythe this year, and still receive 0 consideration from anybody for this team?
I would have Marchand on my team as well. I think Canada should take all scoring wingers with their remaining forward spots is my biggest argument/issue. Marchand is good defensively but he's still one of Canada's best scoring wingers.
Not when you want a checking line winger.
He has the best 5v5 stats out of anyone available. He's exactly who you pick for the 3rd line.
He also played the most minutes in the world championship playoff games out of the forwards (yes when they were defending leads). Plus he's a natural winger.
If he gets snubbed for more centers to crawl over to the wing and under perform there (Duchene at the olympics) I'd be dissapointed.
O'reilly should make it out of versatility. Perry is a no brainer. Hall and Giroux/Thornton would be the 5 guys i have battling for the 4 spots.
He has the best 5v5 stats out of anyone available. He's exactly who you pick for the 3rd line.
He also played the most minutes in the world championship playoff games out of the forwards (yes when they were defending leads). Plus he's a natural winger.
If he gets snubbed for more centers to crawl over to the wing and under perform there (Duchene at the olympics) I'd be dissapointed.
O'reilly should make it out of versatility. Perry is a no brainer. Hall and Giroux/Thornton would be the 5 guys i have battling for the 4 spots.
I may be alone here but.
Didn't anyone else find that aside from a few good plays Perry just seems as if he is tired?
I could be wrong, it would be the about the 1000th time but he just seemed a little..................tired.
To me.
I do respect and admire his willingness to play and put out however.
I may be alone here but.
Didn't anyone else find that aside from a few good plays Perry just seems as if he is tired?
I could be wrong, it would be the about the 1000th time but he just seemed a little..................tired.
To me.
I do respect and admire his willingness to play and put out however.
You're not alone. I wouldn't say he was going through the motions, because he wasn't, but he wasn't on top of his game.
I may be alone here but.
Didn't anyone else find that aside from a few good plays Perry just seems as if he is tired?
I could be wrong, it would be the about the 1000th time but he just seemed a little..................tired.
To me.
I do respect and admire his willingness to play and put out however.
Only Getzlaf can maximise Perry. I feel in the international level, if he's not with Getzlaf he won't dictate the game on his own. The two together work wonders for a reason.
Patrick Marleau might still contend for a spot on the 2018 Olympic team with his speed. He could play a Niedermayer 2010 role, I feel.
What are his prospects for a spot here?
I would personally put O'Reilly, Giroux, Hall, Duchene and Stone ahead of him but HC wont see it that way and that's fair. Plus it's not hard to imagine him and Getzlaf just absolutely going off.
Patrick Marleau might still contend for a spot on the 2018 Olympic team with his speed. He could play a Niedermayer 2010 role, I feel.
What are his prospects for a spot here?