kabidjan18
Registered User
- Apr 20, 2015
- 5,873
- 2,185
Your argument is better made switching the order of your two points. First, European players and college players are better than 75% of American NHL players, second, of those 25% it is difficult to get players. The other way around I would have a field day mentioning all the players who never get invited or only get invited once.http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=1831645&page=19
Go back and read last years thread trying to get players, it's not easy. Not to mention, there are a lot of NHL players that the US could invite, that wouldn't be as useful in this tournament as players playing in Europe, and the really really good college players. Austin Matthews as an example, is probably better than more 75% of the forwards for the US in the NHL.
Not to mention, there are lots of skilled USA players playing in Europe, that understand the big ice, and are a lot more useful than say a Hendricks (last years captain) at scoring goals or defending.
For point one I've ever bought the whole big ice deal but it's a valid argument. For the second, I never claimed it was easy, however if it is assumed that NHL players are de facto better it is obvious that USA Hockey does not go to all extents possible to get the best team possible.
The thing is that all the depth charts below are NHL stacked depth charts, Matthews being the only consistent exception and a few had Connor, a few had Lasch, I think one had Vesey but there are going to be at least a half dozen more than that. I put out my guesses, if you don't like one then volunteer your own. All in all I still don't buy that USA Hockey chooses college kids, AHL guys and euro guys because they're more suited to the big ice but we believe what we each believe.