wow, if that's our lineup...
I don`t think there is any value, more like negative value.
We all understand your OPINION at this point, no need to hammer it home. If Greene and Scuderi are 5&6 for Game 1 your ability to become an NHL scout will be forever gone-like their foot speed.
I start to look like atleast one of the Andreoff, Latta or Nolan will not make the team. What is your opinion?
I still think it's Clifford. When the cap is so tight it doesn't make sense to have a 4th liner making over 1.5 million. All of Nolan, Andreoff and Latta make under a million.
Gaborik-Kopitar-Purcell
Pearson-Carter-Toffoli
King-Lewis-Brown
Andreoff-Latta-Nolan
Dowd, Shore
Andreoff-Latta-Nolan in against heavy teams or you run
Andreoff-Dowd-Shore against softer teams. Win win. And if Mersch forces his way in, you look at moving King.
just wait man these over ready bottom 6 prospects are going to totally make up for the bad asset management in lucic and sekera... shore has been boring and an offensive blackhole so he can tear it up this year pulling a fast one on the sport.
Losing Clifford makes us a softer team Lets not forget we lost lucic who lead us in hits. Next greene doesn't look like he s going to make the kings this year. If we lose clifford the only real hitting forward is brown
How so? Latta, Nolan, Andreoff are plenty tough.
Nolan has a bad back i wouldn't count on him throwing many hits. ANdy i agree. Latta has to make this team and i don't see him beating out dowd or shore. Tough is one thing throwing hits and playing physical is another
Sutter plays 4 lines 5 vs 5 pretty equally , and only late 2 and 3 period he plays more lines 1-3 so for that i think bottom 6 players aren`t scoring enough.
But he wins everytime when Clifford-Shore-Nolan plays against Toews-Kane etc and after line change its 0-0.
Lewis hits more per game than Clifford but yes i get your point but you win some and lose some. Less hits more cap, Greene played 34minutes last year.
Clifford was top 10 in the league in hits when he last played a full season He is always in the top 3 on the kings in hits when he plays a full season. I bring up greene because when he did play hes always among the leaders in hits on the kings. I think the kings would lose more then some if they get rid of the physical play of clifford
I'd be surprised not to see Clifford opening night.
Gaborik-Kopitar-Purcell
Pearson-Carter Toffoli
King-Lewis-Brown
Nolan-Dowd-Andreoff
Shore, Latta
McNabb-Doughty
Muzzin-Martinez
Forbort-Gravel
7th d is either Greene or Gilbert
Their stride got weaker with age and so did their quickness, there's no diet to fix to what even at their peak weren't good skaters.For the record I'm not going to bat for Greene/Scuderi-I see the same thing you guys see. Those 2 players could bounce back if they change their training. If they are doing the same thing they have been doing the foot speed will remain the same. Hopefully, they have changed trainers and/or dietitians. My point remains, as somebody else in this thread stated, if Sutter has Greene and Scuderi available they WILL play. A kid would have to seriously outplay them in limited minutes during the pre season. What Greene and Scuderi lack in physical tools they make up for in hockey IQ by leaps and bounds over a 20 year old defensemen. When the PK hits the ice I fully expect to see Greene and Scuderi lead the charge IF they are still on the team come Game 1. I think if either player is out played in the pre season one or both will be traded.
Their stride got weaker with age and so did their quickness, there's no died to fix to what even at their peak weren't good skaters.
And while I don't wanna be all negative I have to say that they are the prime candidates for spending a lot of time in the penalty box watching other people kill penalties...
And they both passed through waivers and I highly doubt there is any interest around the league for them at this point of their careers...
They used to be great and beloved as Kings, no issues about their past achievements/contributions to the team. It's time to move on...
posts on this thread, this one included:
- use: 46
- not use: 55
boy, you're making a lot of sense, but please allow some air.