2015 CBJ Training Camp Thread (9/18-10/3)

Jackets Woodchuck

Registered User
Dec 27, 2010
4,168
296
The website's schedule seems to indicate that the non-game group(s) will practice on the Ice Haus rink (public) on Monday and Tuesday while those playing that night will practice on the arena rink (closed-door). Is this how preseason game days are usually handled?
 

Nanabijou

Booooooooooone
Dec 22, 2009
2,993
659
Columbus, Ohio
Thanks. Two minor suggestions:

If you can, it might be helpful to have another column for players that cbj have the rights to, but aren't at camp (Dansk, Werenski, etc) and then bold the players in all columns that have cbj contracts so we can see who counts against the 50 contract limit.
 

burnstick

Registered User
Jan 7, 2015
112
0
Here is a spreadsheet that shows the breakdown of where players will likely be hgeaded following training camp.

Columbus - locks to make Blue Jackets roster
Borderline could make Blue Jackets or Monsters roster
Cleveland - will likely be assigned to Monsters roster
Juniors/Europe - will likely be assigned to CHL or Europe
Columbus or Bust - PTO players, not sure to make blue Jackets roster but probably won't accept assignment to Monsters
? - no idea where the two goalies not staying in C-Bus or going to Cleveland are headed post-camp

Blue%20Jackets%20Training%20Camp%20Roster%20Breakdown_zpsdswwponn.png


If anyone has any advice on how to improve the chart, please let me know.

Mods, if this belongs in another thread, I apologize. I started a new thread because I wasn't sure where to put it.

first day of camp a little soon to suggest who is a lock ,agree with most players but every has it's suprises
 

S1N4TR4

CBJ CBJ CBJ
Nov 15, 2013
6,186
5,054
Here is a spreadsheet that shows the breakdown of where players will likely be hgeaded following training camp.

Columbus - locks to make Blue Jackets roster
Borderline could make Blue Jackets or Monsters roster
Cleveland - will likely be assigned to Monsters roster
Juniors/Europe - will likely be assigned to CHL or Europe
Columbus or Bust - PTO players, not sure to make blue Jackets roster but probably won't accept assignment to Monsters
? - no idea where the two goalies not staying in C-Bus or going to Cleveland are headed post-camp

Blue%20Jackets%20Training%20Camp%20Roster%20Breakdown_zpsdswwponn.png


If anyone has any advice on how to improve the chart, please let me know.

Mods, if this belongs in another thread, I apologize. I started a new thread because I wasn't sure where to put it.

Portzline tweeted that Quenneville hinted that he was headed to Cleveland even though some have been reporting that he is headed to Europe..
 

Nanabijou

Booooooooooone
Dec 22, 2009
2,993
659
Columbus, Ohio
Thanks. Two minor suggestions:

If you can, it might be helpful to have another column for players that cbj have the rights to, but aren't at camp (Dansk, Werenski, etc) and then bold the players in all columns that have cbj contracts so we can see who counts against the 50 contract limit.

Actually, never mind. I think the only player who has a CBJ contract who isn't at camp is Dansk. I believe the CBJ have 48 players under contract plus Dansk.

So, question: does Dansk count as a contract (meaning there are 49) or does it not until he comes back next year? Do the contracts that slide a year upon return to juniors (Sherwood, Bittner, etc) count towards the limit of 50?
 

ndd17

In Eaves we trust!
Jul 14, 2012
1,420
5
Russia
So, question: does Dansk count as a contract (meaning there are 49) or does it not until he comes back next year? Do the contracts that slide a year upon return to juniors (Sherwood, Bittner, etc) count towards the limit of 50?
IIRC 18 and 19-year-old players assigned to their junior team in the CHL do not count against the 50-contract maximum until they have played at least 11 NHL games in one season.
Oscar Dansk is on loan overseas. He still counts against 50 contract limit.
 

caley

Moderator
Aug 19, 2006
17,681
2,793
twitter.com
Portzline tweeted that Quenneville hinted that he was headed to Cleveland even though some have been reporting that he is headed to Europe..

I have an inside source (Always wanted to say that!), but Quenneville has an AHL contract. I'd presume it's with Lake Erie, but that part wasn't confirmed to me.
 

Mayor Bee

Registered User
Dec 29, 2008
18,087
535
Actually, never mind. I think the only player who has a CBJ contract who isn't at camp is Dansk. I believe the CBJ have 48 players under contract plus Dansk.

So, question: does Dansk count as a contract (meaning there are 49) or does it not until he comes back next year? Do the contracts that slide a year upon return to juniors (Sherwood, Bittner, etc) count towards the limit of 50?

Contracts in a slide (where they're actually in the CHL, not simply with the possibility of doing so) do not count against the 50-contract limit. A team can exceed the 50-contract limit for official functions during training camp only.

Dansk is technically on loan, so he still counts against the limit.
 

MAHJ71

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 6, 2014
11,794
4,131
NWA 217
Good time this morning at the 9am open session.. Picked up a free long-sleeve T-shirt to go along with it as well that was actually pretty nice.
 

MAHJ71

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 6, 2014
11,794
4,131
NWA 217
Oleg Yevenko #66 stands out big time .. though not for the right reasons being he is 6'7ish tall and appeared to be out of shape.

He was keeled over sucking wind quite a few times during the Nationwide ice session that followed the 45 minutes in the Ice Haus. He really seemed to be the only one struggling (conditioning wise) out of the group during the first session this morning.

Kole Sherwood #88 appeared pretty composed considering his age, etc.. but did get knocked around a bit more than others. Being a local kid I can't help but root for him though.

Justin Falk #44 was pretty darn physical for practice.. at one point in the Nationwide session he clobbered Calvert into the boards (causing him to go down) and HCTR had a quick chit-chat with him shortly after. :D
 

hardkorejackets

Registered User
Nov 6, 2013
768
187
Coldwater, OH
Here is a spreadsheet that shows the breakdown of where players will likely be hgeaded following training camp.

Columbus - locks to make Blue Jackets roster
Borderline could make Blue Jackets or Monsters roster
Cleveland - will likely be assigned to Monsters roster
Juniors/Europe - will likely be assigned to CHL or Europe
Columbus or Bust - PTO players, not sure to make blue Jackets roster but probably won't accept assignment to Monsters
? - no idea where the two goalies not staying in C-Bus or going to Cleveland are headed post-camp

Blue%20Jackets%20Training%20Camp%20Roster%20Breakdown_zpsdswwponn.png


If anyone has any advice on how to improve the chart, please let me know.

Mods, if this belongs in another thread, I apologize. I started a new thread because I wasn't sure where to put it.

Good work. Apparently, Quenneville is going to the AHL. But.. I would move Falk from Columbus to "Borderline". Also, would move Paliotta from Cleveland to "Borderline". I think Paliotta can challenge for a spot here in Columbus.
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
Good work. Apparently, Quenneville is going to the AHL. But.. I would move Falk from Columbus to "Borderline". Also, would move Paliotta from Cleveland to "Borderline". I think Paliotta can challenge for a spot here in Columbus.

Falk is on a two-way deal; no chance he's a lock. Paliotta should be considered a borderline player.

Having said that that would be 8 d on the team if we keep the main 7 and add Falk or Paliotta. Baring injury that leaves the potential for a d on the move or exposed to waivers.

Baring injury I don't think Chaput has a chance in hell. I see no reason that Milano would have any more or less a shot as Bjork.

Lastly I wouldn't be surprised if we start to see Heathington and Madaisky's names start to get more and more notice. Also don't be surprised to start to see Tynan get more notice as well.
 
Last edited:

ReggieRed

Good job. Good work. Good goal next!
Jan 6, 2015
1,817
658
Milford Center, OH
That's the Three C Body Shop line I actually would like to see.

I'm claiming the trademark on the "Three C Body Shop" line(TM). From back in July in another thread...
Saad-Johansen-Jenner
Foligno-Dubi-Atkinson
Hartnell-Wennberg-Bourque
Calvert-Campbell-Clarkson

JJ-Savard
Murray-Prout
Tyutin-Connauton

The "Three-C" line, and the 4th-line to boot. The Three-C Body Shop marketing department should be drooling over that...car collisions, 4th-line bangers, etc. Or maybe they could be called the "Body Shop" line?

Man, will I be rolling in it once the royalties start pouring in. :yo:

Seriously, that's a heck of a fourth line...at least on paper.
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
Falk is on a two-way deal; no chance he's a lock. Paliotta should be considered a borderline player.

Having said that that would be 8 d on the team if we keep the main 7 and add Falk or Paliotta. Baring injury that leaves the potential for a d on the move or exposed to waivers.

Baring injury I don't think Chaput has a chance in hell. I see no reason that Milano would have any more or less a shot as Bjork.

Lastly I wouldn't be surprised if we start to see Heathington and Madaisky's names start to get more and more notice. Also don't be surprised to start to see Tynan get more notice as well.

By all accounts Milano's game is more raw and he's not as good defensively as Bjorkstrand. Bjorkstrand has scored alot more too. Milano's a full year younger and might end up better than Bjorkstrand, but for now, he's not as good.
 

MFRONE

Registered User
Feb 3, 2005
12,990
1,588
Columbus, Ohio
Going to be a tough for Rychel to make the big squad if they have him skating with Sheppard and Boll on the 4th line in the preseason opener.
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
By all accounts Milano's game is more raw and he's not as good defensively as Bjorkstrand. Bjorkstrand has scored alot more too. Milano's a full year younger and might end up better than Bjorkstrand, but for now, he's not as good.

Uh sure. The scored a lot more too is amusing. Plymouth was a terrible team in which Milano led the team in scoring by a huge margin playing in like 15 less games. You know Plymouth didn't have the advantage of having Strome and McDavid (as an example) on the same team. Who knows, maybe someday we'll reunite Bjork and Bittner.

Don't be surprised to see both of them start in the AHL and, from there, all bets will be off on who sticks first. I think both will have long careers and I wouldn't be surprised to see them stick in the NHL around the same time.
 
Last edited:

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,804
13,353
Canada
Uh sure. The scored a lot more too is amusing. Plymouth was a terrible team in which Milano led the team in scoring by a huge margin playing in like 15 less games. You know Plymouth didn't have the advantage of having Strome and McDavid (as an example) on the same team. Who knows, maybe someday we'll reunite Bjork and Bittner.

Don't be surprised to see both of them start in the AHL and, from there, all bets will be off on who sticks first. I think both will have long careers and I wouldn't be surprised to see them stick in the NHL around the same time.

Why is it hard to believe Bjorkstrand is ahead of Milano at this point? You laugh at him bringing up point totals but you do realize he had 30 points more then 2nd place on his team and the best player in his league?
 

Ad

Ad

Ad