SuperGenius
For Duty & Humanity!
- Mar 18, 2008
- 4,639
- 199
You are NOT trading Dubinsky! No No No NO!
Don't tell me you believe Garrioch?
You are NOT trading Dubinsky! No No No NO!
Don't tell me you believe Garrioch?
Don't tell me you believe Garrioch?
What's the point? I was having fun taking a look at what our team could look like if all of our players develop properly.
You are the one with the typical, oh we said prospect x would be good and he wasn't. That's the typical response of someone trying to be a you know what.
I am not sure what your problem is with my post. I would suggest you just ignore it and not post a S.A. response if you don't like talking about it.
It would also appear that you're blinded by logic and reason, then projecting them onto an inherently nonsensical Winnipeg team.
It seems to me that what Winnipeg really wants is to do nothing for their first four or five years, banking on their honeymoon period lasting that long to maintain the STH waiting list. Then they'll make a couple of moves to generate hype and excitement while talking about "sending a message", even if it's mere window dressing. We've seen this here; it's where Sergei Fedorov came from.
I went through Cheveldayoff's entire transaction history a couple days ago on the main boards. His biggest three trades have been picks for Frolik, Oduya for picks, and a pick for Setoguchi. In 2 1/2 years, that's all he's done. Having seen the way that Edmonton and Calgary have done things in the recent past, I don't think Winnipeg gives a damn if they win or lose, as long as people show up.
Could be nothing, scouts just doing their job. But last trade deadline, it was said that the Blue Jackets and the Sabres had a deal in place for Drew Stafford. Then Gaborik became available and Jarmo went after him instead. I wonder if he still has interest in Stafford. Thing is, who goes and where does he fit? He has a cap hit of $4 million and has another year left before becoming a UFA.David Pagnotta @TheFourthPeriod 31m
In no particular order, scouts/team reps here at BUF/TOR game from: NJ, MTL, ANA (2), LA, STL, EDM, NYR, CHI, SJ, PHI, CBJ, PHX, NAS, DAL
Matt Moulson??? Another soon to be UFA who adds scoring.
Could be nothing, scouts just doing their job. But last trade deadline, it was said that the Blue Jackets and the Sabres had a deal in place for Drew Stafford. Then Gaborik became available and Jarmo went after him instead. I wonder if he still has interest in Stafford. Thing is, who goes and where does he fit? He has a cap hit of $4 million and has another year left before becoming a UFA.
Another possibility would be Ott. He would be a rent a player and has a NTC. Cap hit of $2.95 mil. Another Jarmo/JD type player with the leadership thing.
Matt Moulson??? Another soon to be UFA who adds scoring.
Unless we want to give up our 1st and one of Rychel, Wennberg, Dano. Won't happen. Buffalo wants someone to back up the truck
Which is why I asked - and now you answered. My initial reply to the "future lines" discussion assumed we were assuming that's how it would be in a couple of years and using that to determine a current course of action. Based on past history, with prospects throughout the league, that didn't seem wise, so I pointed out how that hadn't worked in the past.
That seemed to set you off, so I asked. Turns out it was just for fun. I can live with that.
See above. Totally misreading my post.
This happens to be exactly the same mentality that Nashville had a couple years ago as the trade deadline loomed. Trade Ryan Suter for a monstrous package of picks, players, and prospects; or keep him and go for the Cup? Set the team up to continue to contend for years to come, or run the risk of falling short and losing Suter for nothing.
Of course, we know what happened. Nashville kept him and went for the Cup, got bounced in the second round, then lost Suter for absolutely nothing. Was it worth it?
Fair enough, but you could have just said that instead of posting the prospects that didn't work out. The only way to take that is, these players didn't work, so the current ones won't. That is the only thing to take out of that post when nothing but names of prospects who didn't develop are posted.
I'll say it here and you guys can hold me to it. If the Jackets trade Dubinsky, my days of an economically and emotionally invested Jackets fan is over. That's how strongly I feel about what Dubinsky means to the organization. With the exception of Tyler Wright and Kevin Dineen, this organization hasn't had too many players with the intensity of Dubie. What sets him apart is the skill level he plays with. He raises the level of his teammates. It would be an unmitigated disaster if GMJK would pull a move like this.
If Jarmo has his way Dubie will be cottaging it up in the summers with Kenny Holland and helping the Red Wings, just like Wright
Say what?
This makes no sense whatsoever, care to enlighten us?
Say what?
This makes no sense whatsoever, care to enlighten us?
Don't tell me you believe Garrioch?
The first time I read this I thought it said "Don't tell me you believe IN Garrioch?" And I will admit I think it stretches the boundaries of credulity.
Please don't feed him.... HF created an ignore button for a reason
I used to use that feature until one day every thread consisted of only my posts...
Rob Kunz @Rob10TVSports 9s
Interesting that #CBJ scouting the Bruins and Stars tonight. Done with Boston this season, and don't play Dallas until March.