2014 Trade Deadline Thread (All General Deadline Talk/Proposals/Blog Rumors in here)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Double-Shift Lasse

Just post better
Dec 22, 2004
34,649
15,879
Exurban Cbus
the guy I'd target is Stastny. I have no issue with Dubinsky on wing and playing center due to injury. However that probably has nothing to do with the deadline.

As a player, that's who I'd like, too.

I'm no smartie with the cap/contract stuff, but I'm having trouble figuring out what all would need to go away to bring him in. Is it possible you end up with Dubi at center anyway?

Those questions aside, I'm not sure the Avs are really going to move him. I think they have plenty of room to get him signed and enough seasons before MacKinnon (for example) gets paid to figure that scenario out. At least, if I was an Avs fan, that's what I'd be thinking.
 

IHeartZherdev*

Guest
Of course. The point is good teams usually don't go out and spend big money to sign/trade for a LW/RW.

How many have went out and gotten a LW/RW who was owed a lot of money and years?

Blackhawks and Marian Hossa? Minnesota Wild and Zach Parise? NJ Devils and Illya Kovalchuk? LA Kings and Jeff Carter? Carolina and Alex Semin? San Jose Sharks and Dany Heatly? Jets aquired Andrew Ladd and Blake Wheeler, gave both long term deals...

Oh yeah, and the Rangers and Rick Nash?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MapleJ

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
88
0
Blackhawks and Marian Hossa? Minnesota Wild and Zach Parise? NJ Devils and Illya Kovalchuk? LA Kings and Jeff Carter? Carolina and Alex Semin? San Jose Sharks and Dany Heatly? Jets aquired Andrew Ladd and Blake Wheeler, gave both long term deals...

Oh yeah, and the Rangers and Rick Nash?

And one day...

You too, can be the Winnipeg jets.
 

IHeartZherdev*

Guest
Because that puts him in the same bracket as guys like Crosby and Giroux ... ahead of guys like Toews. Is Vanek really comparable to any of those players? And, as many have mentioned, he's 30 years old already. How many 40 goal seasons does he really have left?

This is really a nonsensical way to look at this. Giroux, Crosby, Perry, Parise...These guys aren't available. They rarely are. On the occasion one does become available (like Parise) they get a huge deal.

And even guys like Getzlaf, Perry, who re-up with their current team, these guys got their deals in their late 20's which will carry huge cap hits well through their mid-to-late 30's. I mean, Horton is almost 30 and had a bum shoulder and he got 7 years.

I don't see any reason to expect Vanek to have a drop off anytime soon, he's a pure goal scorer. Guys like Marleau, Hossa, etc have no problem scoring well into their 30s.

But even so...that's the cost of doing business. No elite player takes a 2 year deal in their prime if they are going to UFA. You think Vanek's (or any of these guys) agents are going to take a 2-3 year deal?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jackets16

Registered User
Jan 7, 2005
12,018
619
Blackhawks and Marian Hossa? Minnesota Wild and Zach Parise? NJ Devils and Illya Kovalchuk? LA Kings and Jeff Carter? Carolina and Alex Semin? San Jose Sharks and Dany Heatly? Jets aquired Andrew Ladd and Blake Wheeler, gave both long term deals...

Oh yeah, and the Rangers and Rick Nash?

Jeff Carter makes the 5th most on the Kings. I am pretty sure everyone making more than him are C, D, and G. Again, what team has won the cup with a LW or RW making the most? I honestly don't know and would like to know. Chicago may have with Hossa.
 

IHeartZherdev*

Guest
Jeff Carter makes the 5th most on the Kings. I am pretty sure everyone making more than him are C, D, and G. Again, what team has won the cup with a LW or RW making the most? I honestly don't know and would like to know. Chicago may have with Hossa.

I think it's Hossa although NJ reached the cup finals with Kovalchuk as a highest paid player. Not sure when his extension kicked in but it looks like Lucic is the highest paid forward on the Bruins.

there is no one formula for position-salary to winning the cup. When LA won, Quick wasn't making that much and both times Chicago won they weren't paying their goalie much. The Bos-Van series had two high priced, big named goalies. Also, Bruins won and reached a cup final without paying big money to Krejci or Bergeron as their top centers and having Chara making the most and the rest of the money spread more evenly.

But getting back to Vanek, I don't think you can say that giving him a huge deal (or the Wild giving Parise a huge deal) knocks them from Cup contention based on previous history. I think Vanek is worth it and if there's a chance they could get him I'd be all in favor of the CBJ landing him.
 

cslebn

80 forever
Feb 15, 2012
2,802
1,366
Jeff Carter makes the 5th most on the Kings. I am pretty sure everyone making more than him are C, D, and G. Again, what team has won the cup with a LW or RW making the most? I honestly don't know and would like to know. Chicago may have with Hossa.

Kane and Toews make the same amount (2013)
Hossa (2010) by far
Selanne was the highest paid FW (Nieds and Pronger made more) (2007)

That's it for the last 10 years. And man Doug Weight made a lot on that 06 Canes team.
 

Jackets16

Registered User
Jan 7, 2005
12,018
619
Kane and Toews make the same amount (2013)
Hossa (2010) by far
Selanne was the highest paid FW (Nieds and Pronger made more) (2007)

That's it for the last 10 years. And man Doug Weight made a lot on that 06 Canes team.

Thank you
 

Xoggz22

Registered User
Mar 4, 2002
7,930
3,474
Columbus, Ohio
Had a dream last night that they got Evander Kane for Atkinson and picks.

I could see that and would support it. Not that I don't like Atkinson(on the contrary) but I think he offers very good value and could easily see Kane taking a spot in the top 6 allowing one of those wings to slide down to Atkinson's spot. My biggest fear with Kane is what is he going to want on his next contract and does he want to play in a secondary market or is he a big market guy?
 

IHeartZherdev*

Guest
I could see that and would support it. Not that I don't like Atkinson(on the contrary) but I think he offers very good value and could easily see Kane taking a spot in the top 6 allowing one of those wings to slide down to Atkinson's spot. My biggest fear with Kane is what is he going to want on his next contract and does he want to play in a secondary market or is he a big market guy?

Kane is signed through 2018. ;)
 

Mayor Bee

Registered User
Dec 29, 2008
18,087
535
This brings up an interesting question. Does anyone know the last team to win the Stanley Cup with a LW or RW making the most money on the team? It seems to me that spending on C, D, and G is the smart thing to do. Along with drafting them. We have seen that as we have gone away, for the most part, from drafting LW/RW early. Johansen, Murray, Wennberg, Jenner, Dansk, etc....

I think it's an illusion that's created by time in youth hockey. Generally, the best offensive forward on his team is going to play center. As he continues on through the age groups, he's not being moved unless he's clearly better on the wing.

When you're talking about top prospects, they're generally guys who have been the best player on their team the entire way up, so they've never moved to a different position. It's just like in baseball; they draft mostly shortstops, center fielders, and hitters. A CF who can't hack it at the highest level can be moved, and a shortstop who can't field well enough can be moved, but no one except Cal Ripken moves to CF or SS.
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
We've tried the superstar, goal scoring winger angle before. Let's continue to build with the hard working blocks like we are now. I'll make the valid argument that you win more with guys like Dubinsky and Foligno, than you do with Tomas Vanek or Rick Nash.

Dubinsky and Foligno are two hugely valuable players to us. If I ever thought we had to get rid of them to accommodate Vanek, I'd forget Vanek. But we have more than enough cap space so there's no dilemma. You've constructed a false choice.
 

Xoggz22

Registered User
Mar 4, 2002
7,930
3,474
Columbus, Ohio
Dubinsky and Foligno are two hugely valuable players to us. If I ever thought we had to get rid of them to accommodate Vanek, I'd forget Vanek. But we have more than enough cap space so there's no dilemma. You've constructed a false choice.

The problem is, Columbus can't sustain being a cap team at the current attendance and revenue stream level. Adding salary isn't likely to continue. I still look at the Blues model and think the team will continue to get younger and better and move some salary. I don't think our salary figure will rise. I thought getting Gaborik was a major surprise given his salary structure but then thought he was a player they would move at this year's deadline to gain assets. I have a hard time thinking the CBJ adds big time players in the off season without removing salary.

Certainly I could be way off base but I simply don't see the deep pockets and until this team wins the fans will remain at 14,000 per game. They need to go two rounds in the playoffs to likely break even....
 

CBJWerenski8

Rest in Peace Johnny
Jun 13, 2009
43,696
26,743
Count me out for Kane. Just got a weird feeling about him, and that he wouldn't fit in with the team or the city. Great player though
 

EspenK

Registered User
Sep 25, 2011
15,842
4,445
I wondered this aloud when musing about Paul Stastny, sop will someone help me out here? My guess is this doesn't work with the salary cap this season unless something else goes away. Is that right?

I'm not an expert on the cap, matter of fact I tend to be on the slow side but in trying to learn here goes. According to CapGeek we will have almost 4 mill available at the deadline. Stastny makes 6.6 so we'd have to ditch the 2.6 mill difference. Not exactly sure why our amount fluctuates, I think it has to do with IR, demotions, etc. So sending one of our young D wouldn't cover the shortfall;even throwing in a low paid F doesn't help. Nikitin & a Skille, Comeau, etc would cover it.

Any input/corrections/clarifications greatly welcomed.
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
The problem is, Columbus can't sustain being a cap team at the current attendance and revenue stream level. Adding salary isn't likely to continue. I still look at the Blues model and think the team will continue to get younger and better and move some salary. I don't think our salary figure will rise. I thought getting Gaborik was a major surprise given his salary structure but then thought he was a player they would move at this year's deadline to gain assets. I have a hard time thinking the CBJ adds big time players in the off season without removing salary.

Certainly I could be way off base but I simply don't see the deep pockets and until this team wins the fans will remain at 14,000 per game. They need to go two rounds in the playoffs to likely break even....

You could have said the same thing five years ago, and yet we've frequently been a cap team. I've been surprised in the past that ownership has been willing to spend so much, but I guess its their call as to how much money they are willing to lose each year.
 

cbjfaninmo

4 those about 2 rock
Mar 17, 2012
1,452
115
Lake of the Ozarks, MO
The problem is, Columbus can't sustain being a cap team at the current attendance and revenue stream level. Adding salary isn't likely to continue. I still look at the Blues model and think the team will continue to get younger and better and move some salary. I don't think our salary figure will rise. I thought getting Gaborik was a major surprise given his salary structure but then thought he was a player they would move at this year's deadline to gain assets. I have a hard time thinking the CBJ adds big time players in the off season without removing salary.

Certainly I could be way off base but I simply don't see the deep pockets and until this team wins the fans will remain at 14,000 per game. They need to go two rounds in the playoffs to likely break even....

I agree with you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad