blahblah
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2005
- 21,327
- 972
Of course. The point is good teams usually don't go out and spend big money to sign/trade for a LW/RW.
They might if they have the depth.
Of course. The point is good teams usually don't go out and spend big money to sign/trade for a LW/RW.
the guy I'd target is Stastny. I have no issue with Dubinsky on wing and playing center due to injury. However that probably has nothing to do with the deadline.
They might if they have the depth.
Of course. The point is good teams usually don't go out and spend big money to sign/trade for a LW/RW.
How many have went out and gotten a LW/RW who was owed a lot of money and years?
Blackhawks and Marian Hossa? Minnesota Wild and Zach Parise? NJ Devils and Illya Kovalchuk? LA Kings and Jeff Carter? Carolina and Alex Semin? San Jose Sharks and Dany Heatly? Jets aquired Andrew Ladd and Blake Wheeler, gave both long term deals...
Oh yeah, and the Rangers and Rick Nash?
Because that puts him in the same bracket as guys like Crosby and Giroux ... ahead of guys like Toews. Is Vanek really comparable to any of those players? And, as many have mentioned, he's 30 years old already. How many 40 goal seasons does he really have left?
And one day...
You too, can be the Winnipeg jets.
Blackhawks and Marian Hossa? Minnesota Wild and Zach Parise? NJ Devils and Illya Kovalchuk? LA Kings and Jeff Carter? Carolina and Alex Semin? San Jose Sharks and Dany Heatly? Jets aquired Andrew Ladd and Blake Wheeler, gave both long term deals...
Oh yeah, and the Rangers and Rick Nash?
Jeff Carter makes the 5th most on the Kings. I am pretty sure everyone making more than him are C, D, and G. Again, what team has won the cup with a LW or RW making the most? I honestly don't know and would like to know. Chicago may have with Hossa.
Jeff Carter makes the 5th most on the Kings. I am pretty sure everyone making more than him are C, D, and G. Again, what team has won the cup with a LW or RW making the most? I honestly don't know and would like to know. Chicago may have with Hossa.
Kane and Toews make the same amount (2013)
Hossa (2010) by far
Selanne was the highest paid FW (Nieds and Pronger made more) (2007)
That's it for the last 10 years. And man Doug Weight made a lot on that 06 Canes team.
Had a dream last night that they got Evander Kane for Atkinson and picks.
I could see that and would support it. Not that I don't like Atkinson(on the contrary) but I think he offers very good value and could easily see Kane taking a spot in the top 6 allowing one of those wings to slide down to Atkinson's spot. My biggest fear with Kane is what is he going to want on his next contract and does he want to play in a secondary market or is he a big market guy?
Had a dream last night that they got Evander Kane for Atkinson and picks.
This brings up an interesting question. Does anyone know the last team to win the Stanley Cup with a LW or RW making the most money on the team? It seems to me that spending on C, D, and G is the smart thing to do. Along with drafting them. We have seen that as we have gone away, for the most part, from drafting LW/RW early. Johansen, Murray, Wennberg, Jenner, Dansk, etc....
Had a dream last night that they got Evander Kane for Atkinson and picks.
Kane is signed through 2018.
We've tried the superstar, goal scoring winger angle before. Let's continue to build with the hard working blocks like we are now. I'll make the valid argument that you win more with guys like Dubinsky and Foligno, than you do with Tomas Vanek or Rick Nash.
Dubinsky and Foligno are two hugely valuable players to us. If I ever thought we had to get rid of them to accommodate Vanek, I'd forget Vanek. But we have more than enough cap space so there's no dilemma. You've constructed a false choice.
no one except Cal Ripken moves to CF or SS.
I wondered this aloud when musing about Paul Stastny, sop will someone help me out here? My guess is this doesn't work with the salary cap this season unless something else goes away. Is that right?
The problem is, Columbus can't sustain being a cap team at the current attendance and revenue stream level. Adding salary isn't likely to continue. I still look at the Blues model and think the team will continue to get younger and better and move some salary. I don't think our salary figure will rise. I thought getting Gaborik was a major surprise given his salary structure but then thought he was a player they would move at this year's deadline to gain assets. I have a hard time thinking the CBJ adds big time players in the off season without removing salary.
Certainly I could be way off base but I simply don't see the deep pockets and until this team wins the fans will remain at 14,000 per game. They need to go two rounds in the playoffs to likely break even....
The problem is, Columbus can't sustain being a cap team at the current attendance and revenue stream level. Adding salary isn't likely to continue. I still look at the Blues model and think the team will continue to get younger and better and move some salary. I don't think our salary figure will rise. I thought getting Gaborik was a major surprise given his salary structure but then thought he was a player they would move at this year's deadline to gain assets. I have a hard time thinking the CBJ adds big time players in the off season without removing salary.
Certainly I could be way off base but I simply don't see the deep pockets and until this team wins the fans will remain at 14,000 per game. They need to go two rounds in the playoffs to likely break even....