Frank Bouillon was their #4 that year, would you be comfortable with him too?Klein was the #3 defenseman in Nashvlle in 11-12, the year they finished 5th in the league in points.
Is it concerning to you that he's played on that many exceptional teams and been a plus in his career once?In fact, he was the #3 in Nashville behind Weber and Suter for a very, very long time including a myriad of playoff seasons where they allowed among the fewest goals against in the league.
To the detriment of his teams...Does everyone forget that Klein played top 4 minutes his WHOLE career before coming to NY?
Klein was the #3 defenseman in Nashvlle in 11-12, the year they finished 5th in the league in points.
In fact, he was the #3 in Nashville behind Weber and Suter for a very, very long time including a myriad of playoff seasons where they allowed among the fewest goals against in the league.
It's bordering on vitriol from a lot of you folks, at this point.
The overrating of Stralman and the underrating of Klein on here is alarming.
To the detriment of his teams...
Frank Bouillon was their #4 that year, would you be comfortable with him too?
What gives you the idea that the current best team would be better than an essential all star team that exceeds the salary cap if you did this? 58% is not a hard cap for the max team corsi.
http://rangersunlimited.com/2014/06/20/re-defining-defense/Link me to stats where Nashville would have preformed better without Klein in the lineup, and that he was precisely holding his team back.
Pls.
The year Nashville put up 105 points was a massive, massive, massive fluke. They were the second worst team in the league by both CF% and FF%. That team was in no way, shape, or form a legitimate contender. Being the number three guy behind two stars on that roster does not do anything for Klein.
He played less ES time per game than Bouillon did.Actually, Roman Josi was their #4 for most of that season.
He played less ES time per game than Bouillon did.
Here's an idea. There are conflicting reports on Kevin Hayes, Chicagos former 1st rounder who hasn't signed with them. What about him as a possibility to replace Pouliot? Power forward. Not the best hockey IQ but very strong. Good shot, good hands.
They should be all over him
The year Nashville put up 105 points was a massive, massive, massive fluke. They were the second worst team in the league by both CF% and FF%. That team was in no way, shape, or form a legitimate contender. Being the number three guy behind two stars on that roster does not do anything for Klein.
Klein is not good. He managed to post a negative CF% rel on a bad possession team like Nashville. That means he somehow made Nashville's possession game worse when he hit the ice.
Complete and utter ********.
Their D was other worldly that year (including Klein). Especially in terms of offense. When Josi took that step forward Nashville shot up the ranks. With Suter they are at least a 90 point team. And I watched that team a lot.
My contention is not that Stralman needs someone on his pairing taking greater care of these kinds of things, but that he excels when someone is. My second contention would be that, in order for Stralman to succeed on a McDonagh-Stralman pairing, he would need McDonagh to be handling more of the "without puck" issues than he does. That would mean that McDonagh isn't doing as much of the things we all want him to be doing. That is not a smart use of your roster.
You can poo-poo these stats all you want, but they are legitimate indicators of how good a defender is at playing defense without the puck, which even most good possession defenders are doing more than 40% of the time. They have value, but it needs to be put into context. Staal's job is not to block a shot or throw a hit that Stralman doesn't want to, but to block the shot or throw the hit when he gets the chance and rely on Stralman (or another Ranger) to retrieve the puck after.
And I wasn't using the raw totals of the stats alone. I was using them to paint a picture and lend some color to the raw totals of the Corsi statistics.
I think the opposite is naive. Individual players haven't historically shown a noticeable impact on On-Ice Sv%.I'd like to see data such as on ice SV% with and without Klein. Shot attempts only mean so much with no data of goals scored/against. I can't figure out how to show them before/after the Klein trade, but John Moore's is quite high at .943, it's quite naive to believe Klein has nothing to do with that.
That doesn't explain why nearly every Nashville defenseman performed better without Klein than with.Nashville's system closely resembled Torts' system of play which was a corsi killer.
You don't know what they're indicators of because you have no data on how these totals actually correlate with goal prevention. Your whole thesis on without the puck duties versus with the puck duties and what they entail has nothing to back it up. This is just conjecture that you've summoned up on the spot. You have no data telling us how important blocked shots, takeaways, etc are
Worked for Kings fans!So why even watch the games?
Just stat watch and that's your SCF winner.
Chicago needs a 2nd line center.
We have two of them.
Brassard's RFA rights for Nick Leddy (23 y/o, LD, makes 2.7, skates like McDonagh, RFA next season)
That allows us to trade Staal in a deal for Ryan O'Reilly.
This all fits under even the most modest cap estimates, even with a 13th F and 7th D:
CAPGEEK.COM ARMCHAIR GM ROSTER
CapGeek Armchair GM Roster
FORWARDS
Mats Zuccarello ($4.200m) / Ryan O'Reilly ($6.000m) / Rick Nash ($7.800m)
Chris Kreider ($2.500m) / Derek Stepan ($3.075m) / Martin St. Louis ($5.625m)
Carl Hagelin ($2.250m) / J.T. Miller ($0.894m) / Danny Kristo ($0.827m)
Daniel Carcillo ($0.825m) / Dominic Moore ($1.600m) / Ryan Carter ($0.900m)
Jesper Fast ($0.805m) /
DEFENSEMEN
Ryan McDonagh ($4.700m) / Dan Girardi ($5.500m)
Nick Leddy ($2.700m) / Anton Stralman ($4.000m)
John Moore ($1.500m) / Kevin Klein ($2.900m)
Conor Allen ($0.925m) /
GOALTENDERS
Henrik Lundqvist ($8.500m)
Cameron Talbot ($0.563m)
BUYOUTS
Wade Redden ($0.000m)
Brad Richards ($0.000m)
BONUS OVERAGE
$0
------
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(estimations for 2014-15)
SALARY CAP: $71,100,000; CAP PAYROLL: $68,588,542; BONUSES: $1,295,000
CAP SPACE (22-man roster): $2,511,458
You don't know what they're indicators of because you have no data on how these totals actually correlate with goal prevention. Your whole thesis on without the puck duties versus with the puck duties and what they entail has nothing to back it up. This is just conjecture that you've summoned up on the spot. You have no data telling us how important blocked shots, takeaways, etc are.