Thirty One
Safe is safe.
- Dec 28, 2003
- 28,981
- 24,357
Haha, no. You can criticize a player's performance without declaring him a bust.Kreider had some developing to do this season.
But are you saying he is a bust?
Haha, no. You can criticize a player's performance without declaring him a bust.Kreider had some developing to do this season.
But are you saying he is a bust?
Haha, no. You can criticize a player's performance without declaring him a bust.
Haha, no. You can criticize a player's performance without declaring him a bust.
Haha, no. You can criticize a player's performance without declaring him a bust.
What did Boston do with Kessel? They traded him for futures. Some people scoff at the mere mention of trading DZ for futures. Boston was a team which was upset in the 2009 playoffs by the Canes. Kessel wanted too much money and the Bruins were probably sick of him. They were still a good team in 2010. They blew a 3-0 to Philly. Freak loss. Boston won the Cup in 2011. Seguin didn't play much that first year. He had some great games in the TB series. Seguin is bigger part of the team now. Hamilton is in his first year. Growing pains. Boston didn't look at it at as Stanley Cup in the next few years or bust so we can't trade Kessel in 2009. They lost to the Caps in 2012. They didn't freak out and fire the coach. Trade away half the team. Now they're one win away from reaching the Cup finals.
Chicago is also one win away from reaching the Cup finals. Shaw. Saad. Kruger. Bolland. Frolik. Stalberg. The latter two were acquired in trades. No free agents.
Both teams have experienced professional coaches. Not on the job training. The Hawks already went the legend route with Savard and replaced him with Quenneville.
I don't see how Chris Kreider, a non-NHLer is a core piece on this team, but to each one's own.
There's a possibility he will be a bust. There's a possibility he will develop at a rapid pace from this point on. I don't pretend to have his future all mapped out.So are you expecting him to develop and be better next season or bust?
Either he will develop and help the team next season or he will bust, it's one or the other.
If you could guarantee me a 2nd overall pick and another top 10 for Del Zotto, im in. I just don't think were in a position to take a risk by trading someone like MDZ or Staal for picks, especially with Lundqvist becoming a UFA after next season. Boston also had depth on the wings to wait where we dont really have that luxury. I get the point your trying to make though.
And who said that and where?You can criticize all you want, but to say he is not part of the future is something entirely different.
There's a possibility he will be a bust. There's a possibility he will develop at a rapid pace from this point on. I don't pretend to have his future all mapped out.
Best guess? 65 games, 11 goals, 15 assists. But he must have the widest range of expectations of any player on the team.What are you expecting?
I mean you must have an idea. If it was that outlandish that he is part of the core of this team moving forward you must feel he is closer to bust, no?
And -31- this isn't totally directed at you, just trying to figure out what people expect from him next year.
I am hoping for 15-20 goals, 30-40 points.
Best guess? 65 games, 11 goals, 15 assists. But he must have the widest range of expectations of any player on the team.
And who said that and where?
And it wouldn't shock me if he scored 20-25 goals next season. It wouldn't floor me if scored 5 or less, either. I think I projected him for 7 this season, and most people thought that was a low.I would agree. Seems some people expect 30 goals, some expect 10.
I don't see it as farfetched to see him as part of the core moving forward. I still see the potential offensively but someone really needs to work with him. He is still raw.
And it wouldn't shock me if he scored 20-25 goals next season. It wouldn't floor me if scored 5 or less, either. I think I projected him for 7 this season, and most people thought that was a low.
I thought that would be low, but I also did not expect him to have such a hard time adapting to the NHL game. He looked good again in the playoffs using his size and speed to get and create chances. He just needs to work hard and understand that is how he has to play all the time.
Agreed, but coach should also accept there are growing pains.
Should a coach who is mandated to make the playoffs in a 48 game season have to deal with the growing pains?
Should a coach who is mandated to make the playoffs in a 48 game season have to deal with the growing pains?
Certain coaches deal with it and allow their players to play while grooming them for now and the future.
Talking about the future.
My beef with the org in general this season with Kreider is he should have been left down in the AHL to fully develop, yoyo ing him all the time was not good for nobody.
Forget certain coaches - Im talking about Tortorella's situation last season.
Sure seems like the same type of patience being preached on a player's behalf wasn't extended to the coach after a weird season.
Fair enough.
I think the confusion in the first place was I was talking about the core right now. Maybe Kreider is part of it going forward, maybe hes a bust.
I'd consider the core right now to be:
Lundqvist
McDonagh
Stepan
Nash
Callahan
Girardi
Maybe Staal is he's healthy - maybe Brassard is he continues to play well.
Thats about it though.